Literature DB >> 31776212

Rod Photoreceptors Signal Fast Changes in Daylight Levels Using a Cx36-Independent Retinal Pathway in Mouse.

Rose Pasquale1, Yumiko Umino1, Eduardo Solessio2.   

Abstract

Temporal contrast detected by rod photoreceptors is channeled into multiple retinal rod pathways that ultimately connect to cone photoreceptor pathways via Cx36 gap junctions or via chemical synapses. However, we do not yet understand how the different rod pathways contribute to the perception of temporal contrast (changes in luminance with time) at mesopic light levels, where both rods and cones actively respond to light. Here, we use a forced-choice, operant behavior assay to investigate rod-driven, temporal contrast sensitivity (TCS) in mice of either sex. Transgenic mice with desensitized cones (GNAT2 cpfl3 line) were used to identify rod contributions to TCS in mesopic lights. We found that at low mesopic lights (400 photons/s/μm2 at the retina), control and GNAT2 cpfl3 mice had similar TCS. Surprisingly, at upper mesopic lights (8000 photons/s/μm2), GNAT2 cpfl3 mice exhibited a relative reduction in TCS to low (<12 Hz) while maintaining normal TCS to high (12-36 Hz) temporal frequencies. The rod-driven responses to high temporal frequencies developed gradually over time (>30 min). Furthermore, the TCS of GNAT2 cpfl3 and GNAT2 cpfl3 ::Cx36-/- mice matched closely, indicating that transmission of high-frequency signals (1) does not require the rod-cone Cx36 gap junctions as has been proposed in the past; and (2) a Cx36-independent rod pathway(s) (e.g., direct rod to OFF cone bipolar cell synapses and/or glycinergic synapses from AII amacrine cells to OFF ganglion cells) is sufficient for fast, mesopic rod-driven vision. These findings extend our understanding of the link between visual circuits and perception in mouse.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT The contributions of specific retinal pathways to visual perception are not well understood. We found that the temporal processing properties of rod-driven vision in mice change significantly with light level. In dim lights, rods relay relatively slow temporal variations. However, in daylight conditions, rod pathways exhibit high sensitivity to fast but not to slow temporal variations, whereas cone-driven responses supplement the loss in rod-driven sensitivity to slow temporal variations. Our findings highlight the dynamic interplay of rod- and cone-driven vision as light levels rise from night to daytime levels. Furthermore, the fast, rod-driven signals do not require the rod-to-cone Cx36 gap junctions as proposed in the past, but rather, can be relayed by alternative Cx36-independent rod pathways.
Copyright © 2020 the authors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  gap junctions; mesopic vision; mouse vision; operant behavior; rod pathways; temporal contrast sensitivity

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31776212      PMCID: PMC6975299          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0455-19.2019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  94 in total

Review 1.  Rod vision: pathways and processing in the mammalian retina.

Authors:  S A Bloomfield; R F Dacheux
Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 21.198

2.  Convergence and segregation of the multiple rod pathways in mammalian retina.

Authors:  Béla Völgyi; Michael R Deans; David L Paul; Stewart A Bloomfield
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2004-12-08       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Contributions of the mouse UV photopigment to the ERG and to vision.

Authors:  Gerald H Jacobs; Gary A Williams
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-05-04       Impact factor: 2.379

Review 4.  Parallel Processing of Rod and Cone Signals: Retinal Function and Human Perception.

Authors:  William N Grimes; Adree Songco-Aguas; Fred Rieke
Journal:  Annu Rev Vis Sci       Date:  2018-06-08       Impact factor: 6.422

5.  Speeding rod recovery improves temporal resolution in the retina.

Authors:  Christopher R Fortenbach; Christopher Kessler; Gabriel Peinado Allina; Marie E Burns
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Transducin translocation in rods is triggered by saturation of the GTPase-activating complex.

Authors:  Ekaterina S Lobanova; Stella Finkelstein; Hongman Song; Stephen H Tsang; Ching-Kang Chen; Maxim Sokolov; Nikolai P Skiba; Vadim Y Arshavsky
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-01-31       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Controlling the gain of rod-mediated signals in the Mammalian retina.

Authors:  Felice A Dunn; Thuy Doan; Alapakkam P Sampath; Fred Rieke
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-04-12       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Expression pattern of lacZ reporter gene representing connexin36 in transgenic mice.

Authors:  Joachim Degen; Carola Meier; Ruben S Van Der Giessen; Goran Söhl; Elisabeth Petrasch-Parwez; Stephanie Urschel; Rolf Dermietzel; Karl Schilling; Chris I De Zeeuw; Klaus Willecke
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2004-06-07       Impact factor: 3.215

9.  Loss of cone function without degeneration in a novel Gnat2 knock-out mouse.

Authors:  Kaitryn E Ronning; Gabriel Peinado Allina; Eric B Miller; Robert J Zawadzki; Edward N Pugh; Rolf Herrmann; Marie E Burns
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2018-03-05       Impact factor: 3.467

10.  Visual Temporal Contrast Sensitivity in the Behaving Mouse Shares Fundamental Properties with Human Psychophysics.

Authors:  Yumiko Umino; Rose Pasquale; Eduardo Solessio
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2018-08-29
View more
  3 in total

1.  Neural circuits in the mouse retina support color vision in the upper visual field.

Authors:  Klaudia P Szatko; Maria M Korympidou; Yanli Ran; Philipp Berens; Deniz Dalkara; Timm Schubert; Thomas Euler; Katrin Franke
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-07-13       Impact factor: 14.919

2.  Divergent outer retinal circuits drive image and non-image visual behaviors.

Authors:  Corinne Beier; Ulisse Bocchero; Lior Levy; Zhijing Zhang; Nange Jin; Stephen C Massey; Christophe P Ribelayga; Kirill Martemyanov; Samer Hattar; Johan Pahlberg
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2022-06-28       Impact factor: 9.995

Review 3.  Interphotoreceptor coupling: an evolutionary perspective.

Authors:  Lorenzo Cangiano; Sabrina Asteriti
Journal:  Pflugers Arch       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 3.657

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.