Literature DB >> 30713397

Evaluation of Radiation Exposure on Physicians During Angioplasty for Hemodialysis Access Dysfunction.

Po-Sen Huang1, Zhih-Cherng Chen1,2, Kuo-Ting Tang1, Wei-Ting Chang1,3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous interventions help patients with various cardiovascular diseases, however radiation exposure is a safety concern for both patients and health care providers. We previously reported that dose area product (DAP) is apparently different in central body and upper-limb areas during percutaneous transluminal angioplasty for arteriovenous shunt dysfunction. In this study, we investigated the precise radiation dose at the patients' back and at the non-targeted organs of the operators.
METHODS: The radiation dose was measured with optically stimulated luminescent dosimeters and DAP on several sites including the backs of the patients, gonads, hands and lens of the operators. The studied populations were categorized into central, upper arm and forearm groups based on the lesion sites.
RESULTS: The results indicated that there was a significantly higher radiation dose in the central lesion group than in the upper arm and forearm groups. Conversely, there were no specific differences in total procedure time and fluoroscopy time among groups. The radiation exposure doses in the operators showed that regardless of the site, including lens, hands and gonads of the operators, the radiation dose was significantly higher in the central lesion group.
CONCLUSIONS: The closer the lesion site to the body center, the higher the radiation exposure in both the patients and operators.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arteriovenous shunt dysfunction; Central lesion; PTA; Radiation exposure

Year:  2019        PMID: 30713397      PMCID: PMC6342834          DOI: 10.6515/ACS.201901_35(1).20180730A

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Cardiol Sin        ISSN: 1011-6842            Impact factor:   2.672


  17 in total

1.  Developing clinical performance measures based on the Dialysis Outcomes Quality Initiative Clinical Practice Guidelines: process, outcomes, and implications.

Authors:  Jonathan R Sugarman; Pamela R Frederick; Diane L Frankenfield; William F Owen; William M McClellan
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 8.860

2.  Risk of cancer from diagnostic X-rays: estimates for the UK and 14 other countries.

Authors:  Amy Berrington de González; Sarah Darby
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2004-01-31       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 3.  Radiation risk from medical imaging.

Authors:  Eugene C Lin
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 7.616

4.  Estimating incidence of organ cancer related to PCI radiation exposure in patients treated for acute and chronic total occlusions.

Authors:  Cosmo Godino; Davide Maccagni; Anna Giulia Pavon; Giacomo Viani; Alberto Cappelletti; Alberto Margonato; Antonio Colombo
Journal:  J Invasive Cardiol       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 2.022

5.  An investigation of operator exposure in interventional radiology.

Authors:  Beth A Schueler; Thomas J Vrieze; Haraldur Bjarnason; Anthony W Stanson
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2006 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.333

6.  Radiation hand exposure during restoration of flow to the thrombosed dialysis access graft.

Authors:  Joseph M Stavas; Tony P Smith; David M DeLong; Michael J Miller; Paul V Suhocki; Glenn E Newman
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 3.464

7.  Brain and neck tumors among physicians performing interventional procedures.

Authors:  Ariel Roguin; Jacob Goldstein; Olivier Bar; James A Goldstein
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2013-02-16       Impact factor: 2.778

8.  Patient dose reference levels for interventional radiology: a national approach.

Authors:  Eliseo Vano; R Sanchez; J M Fernandez; J J Gallego; J F Verdu; M Gonzalez de Garay; A Azpiazu; A Segarra; M T Hernandez; M Canis; F Diaz; F Moreno; J Palmero
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  2008-10-18       Impact factor: 2.740

9.  Eye lens exposure to radiation in interventional suites: caution is warranted.

Authors:  Eliseo Vano; Luciano Gonzalez; Jose M Fernández; Ziv J Haskal
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2008-07-15       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  The radiation issue in cardiology: the time for action is now.

Authors:  Eugenio Picano; Eliseo Vano
Journal:  Cardiovasc Ultrasound       Date:  2011-11-21       Impact factor: 2.062

View more
  1 in total

1.  The Effectiveness and Safety between Monoplane and Biplane Imaging During Coronary Angiographies.

Authors:  Chon-Seng Hong; Zhih-Cherng Chen; Kuo-Ting Tang; Wei-Ting Chang
Journal:  Acta Cardiol Sin       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 2.672

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.