Literature DB >> 23419190

Brain and neck tumors among physicians performing interventional procedures.

Ariel Roguin1, Jacob Goldstein, Olivier Bar, James A Goldstein.   

Abstract

Physicians performing interventional procedures are chronically exposed to ionizing radiation, which is known to pose increased cancer risks. We recently reported 9 cases of brain cancer in interventional cardiologists. Subsequently, we received 22 additional cases from around the world, comprising an expanded 31 case cohort. Data were transmitted to us during the past few months. For all cases, where possible, we endeavored to obtain the baseline data, including age, gender, tumor type, and side involved, specialty (cardiologist vs radiologist), and number of years in practice. These data were obtained from the medical records, interviews with patients, when possible, or with family members and/or colleagues. The present report documented brain and neck tumors occurring in 31 physicians: 23 interventional cardiologists, 2 electrophysiologists, and 6 interventional radiologists. All physicians had worked for prolonged periods (latency period 12 to 32 years, mean 23.5 ± 5.9) in active interventional practice with exposure to ionizing radiation in the catheterization laboratory. The tumors included 17 cases (55%) of glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), 2 astrocytomas (7%), and 5 meningiomas (16%). In 26 of 31 cases, data were available regarding the side of the brain involved. The malignancy was left sided in 22 (85%), midline in 1, and right sided in 3 operators. In conclusion, these results raise additional concerns regarding brain cancer developing in physicians performing interventional procedures. Given that the brain is relatively unprotected and the left side of the head is known to be more exposed to radiation than the right, these findings of disproportionate reports of left-sided tumors suggest the possibility of a causal relation to occupational radiation exposure.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23419190     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2012.12.060

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  88 in total

1.  Seeing is believing: increasing intraoperative awareness to scattered radiation in interventional procedures by combining augmented reality, Monte Carlo simulations and wireless dosimeters.

Authors:  Nicolas Loy Rodas; Nicolas Padoy
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2015-02-26       Impact factor: 2.924

2.  Can image enhancement allow radiation dose to be reduced whilst maintaining the perceived diagnostic image quality required for coronary angiography?

Authors:  Anuja Joshi; Amber J Gislason-Lee; Claire Keeble; Uduvil M Sivananthan; Andrew G Davies
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-01-26       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Should future interventional neuroradiologists be screened for mutations that impair radiation-induced DNA repair?

Authors:  Kieran Murphy; Adam Thakore; Marie Constance Lacasse; Danyal Z Khan
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2016-11-05       Impact factor: 1.610

4.  Zero-Fluoroscopy Ablation at the Texas Heart Institute.

Authors:  David Burkland
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2020-02-01

Review 5.  Physician and Patient Radiation Exposure During Endovascular Procedures.

Authors:  Andrew M Goldsweig; J Dawn Abbott; Herbert D Aronow
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2017-02

6.  The Efficacy of Shielding Systems for Reducing Operator Exposure during Neurointerventional Procedures: A Real-World Prospective Study.

Authors:  T R Miller; J Zhuo; G Jindal; R Shivashankar; N Beaty; D Gandhi
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2016-12-22       Impact factor: 3.825

7.  Efficacy and safety of zero-fluoroscopy ablation for supraventricular tachycardias. Use of optional contact force measurement for zero-fluoroscopy ablation in a clinical routine setting.

Authors:  P Seizer; V Bucher; C Frische; D Heinzmann; M Gramlich; I Müller; A Henning; M Hofbeck; G Kerst; M Gawaz; J Schreieck
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2015-10-13       Impact factor: 1.443

8.  Is lead shielding of patients necessary during fluoroscopic procedures? A study based on kyphoplasty.

Authors:  Joshua R Smith; Rebecca M Marsh; Michael S Silosky
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2017-08-18       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  Reduction of Fluoroscopy Time and Radiation Dosage During Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation.

Authors:  Kenichiro Yamagata; Bashar Aldhoon; Josef Kautzner
Journal:  Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev       Date:  2016-08

10.  Impact of latest generation cardiac interventional X-ray equipment on patient image quality and radiation dose for trans-catheter aortic valve implantations.

Authors:  Amber J Gislason-Lee; Claire Keeble; Christoper J Malkin; Daniel Egleston; Josephine Bexon; Stephen M Kengyelics; Daniel Blackman; Andrew G Davies
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-09-29       Impact factor: 3.039

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.