Literature DB >> 14520632

Developing clinical performance measures based on the Dialysis Outcomes Quality Initiative Clinical Practice Guidelines: process, outcomes, and implications.

Jonathan R Sugarman1, Pamela R Frederick, Diane L Frankenfield, William F Owen, William M McClellan.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The National Kidney Foundation-Dialysis Outcomes Quality Initiative (NKF-DOQI) Clinical Practice Guidelines established a widely accepted set of recommendations for high-quality dialysis care. To enhance the End-Stage Renal Disease Core Indicators Project, an ongoing effort to assess and improve dialysis care in the United States, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) commissioned a project to develop clinical performance measures (CPMs) based on the NKF-DOQI guidelines.
METHODS: The CMS contracted with Qualis Health, a private nonprofit organization serving as a Medicare Quality Improvement Organization, to facilitate a 9-month project to develop dialysis CPMs with the participation of a broad range of stakeholders from the renal community. Work groups were established to develop CPMs addressing 4 areas: hemodialysis adequacy, peritoneal dialysis adequacy, vascular access management, and anemia management. The NKF-DOQI guidelines were prioritized based on the strength of the evidence supporting the guidelines, the feasibility of developing performance measures, and the significance of the areas addressed to the quality of care delivered to dialysis patients. Expert panels developed data specifications, sampling approaches, data-collection tools, and analytic strategies.
RESULTS: Sixteen CPMs were developed based on 22 of 114 NKF-DOQI guidelines. After establishing reliability through field-testing of data-collection instruments, the CPMs were applied to a sample of 8,838 randomly selected hemodialysis patients and 1,650 randomly selected adult peritoneal dialysis patients in summer 1999.
CONCLUSION: The development of CPMs based on the NKF-DOQI Clinical Practice Guidelines for dialysis care was accomplished in a timely and effective manner by engaging a broad range of stakeholders and technical experts. The CPMs are important tools to assess and improve the quality of dialysis care in the United States. Few comparable efforts exist in other fields of medicine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14520632     DOI: 10.1016/s0272-6386(03)00867-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis        ISSN: 0272-6386            Impact factor:   8.860


  8 in total

Review 1.  ESRD Databases, Public Policy, and Quality of Care: Translational Medicine and Nephrology.

Authors:  William M McClellan; Laura C Plantinga; Adam S Wilk; Rachel E Patzer
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2016-11-16       Impact factor: 8.237

Review 2.  Hemodialysis Disparities in African Americans: The Deeply Integrated Concept of Race in the Social Fabric of Our Society.

Authors:  Keith C Norris; Sandra F Williams; Connie M Rhee; Susanne B Nicholas; Csaba P Kovesdy; Kamyar Kalantar-Zadeh; L Ebony Boulware
Journal:  Semin Dial       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 3.455

3.  Survival trends of US dialysis patients with heart failure: 1995 to 2005.

Authors:  Austin G Stack; Amir Mohammed; Alan Hanley; Arif Mutwali; Hoang Nguyen
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2011-07-22       Impact factor: 8.237

4.  Serum albumin level and risk for mortality and hospitalization in adolescents on hemodialysis.

Authors:  Sandra Amaral; Wenke Hwang; Barbara Fivush; Alicia Neu; Diane Frankenfield; Susan Furth
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2008-02-20       Impact factor: 8.237

5.  Use of enoxaparin to diminish the incidence of vascular access stenosis/thrombosis in chronic hemodialysis patients.

Authors:  Linda Shavit; Meyer Lifschitz; Shuko Lee; Itzchak Slotki
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2010-01-10       Impact factor: 2.370

6.  Evaluation of Radiation Exposure on Physicians During Angioplasty for Hemodialysis Access Dysfunction.

Authors:  Po-Sen Huang; Zhih-Cherng Chen; Kuo-Ting Tang; Wei-Ting Chang
Journal:  Acta Cardiol Sin       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 2.672

Review 7.  Methods for the guideline-based development of quality indicators--a systematic review.

Authors:  Thomas Kötter; Eva Blozik; Martin Scherer
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 7.327

8.  Variations and characteristics of quality indicators for maintenance hemodialysis patients: A systematic review.

Authors:  Kakuya Niihata; Sayaka Shimizu; Yasushi Tsujimoto; Tatsuyoshi Ikenoue; Shunichi Fukuhara; Shingo Fukuma
Journal:  Health Sci Rep       Date:  2018-09-05
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.