Literature DB >> 30667069

Feasibility study of a point-of-care positron emission tomography system with interactive imaging capability.

Jianyong Jiang1, Ke Li2, Sergey Komarov1, Joseph A O'Sullivan2, Yuan-Chuan Tai1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We investigated the feasibility of a novel positron emission tomography (PET) system that provides near real-time feedback to an operator who can interactively scan a patient to optimize image quality. The system should be compact and mobile to support point-of-care (POC) molecular imaging applications. In this study, we present the key technologies required and discuss the potential benefits of such new capability.
METHODS: The core of this novel PET technology includes trackable PET detectors and a fully three-dimensional, fast image reconstruction engine implemented on multiple graphics processing units (GPUs) to support dynamically changing geometry by calculating the system matrix on-the-fly using a tube-of-response approach. With near real-time image reconstruction capability, a POC-PET system may comprise a maneuverable front PET detector and a second detector panel which can be stationary or moved synchronously with the front detector such that both panels face the region-of-interest (ROI) with the detector trajectory contoured around a patient's body. We built a proof-of-concept prototype using two planar detectors each consisting of a photomultiplier tube (PMT) optically coupled to an array of 48 × 48 lutetium-yttrium oxyorthosilicate (LYSO) crystals (1.0 × 1.0 × 10.0 mm3 each). Only 38 × 38 crystals in each arrays can be clearly re-solved and used for coincidence detection. One detector was mounted to a robotic arm which can position it at arbitrary locations, and the other detector was mounted on a rotational stage. A cylindrical phantom (102 mm in diameter, 150 mm long) with nine spherical lesions (8:1 tumor-to-background activity concentration ratio) was imaged from 27 sampling angles. List-mode events were reconstructed to form images without or with time-of-flight (TOF) information. We conducted two Monte Carlo simulations using two POC-PET systems. The first one uses the same phantom and detector setup as our experiment, with the detector coincidence re-solving time (CRT) ranging from 100 to 700 ps full-width-at-half-maximum (FWHM). The second study simulates a body-size phantom (316 × 228 × 160 mm3 ) imaged by a larger POC-PET system that has 4 × 6 modules (32 × 32 LYSO crystals/module, four in axial and six in transaxial directions) in the front panel and 3 × 8 modules (16 × 16 LYSO crystals/module, three in axial and eight in transaxial directions) in the back panel. We also evaluated an interactive scanning strategy by progressively increasing the number of data sets used for image reconstruction. The updated images were analyzed based on the number of data sets and the detector CRT.
RESULTS: The proof-of-concept prototype re-solves most of the spherical lesions despite a limited number of coincidence events and incomplete sampling. TOF information reduces artifacts in the reconstructed images. Systems with better timing resolution exhibit improved image quality and reduced artifacts. We observed a reconstruction speed of 0.96 × 106 events/s/iteration for 600 × 600 × 224 voxel rectilinear space using four GPUs. A POC-PET system with significantly higher sensitivity can interactively image a body-size object from four angles in less than 7 min.
CONCLUSIONS: We have developed GPU-based fast image reconstruction capability to support a PET system with arbitrary and dynamically changing geometry. Using TOF PET detectors, we demonstrated the feasibility of a PET system that can provide timely visual feedback to an operator who can scan a patient interactively to support POC imaging applications.
© 2019 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  GPU reconstruction; interactive PET Imaging; point-of- care application; time-of-flight PET

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30667069      PMCID: PMC6453727          DOI: 10.1002/mp.13397

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  66 in total

1.  Developments in component-based normalization for 3D PET.

Authors:  R D Badawi; P K Marsden
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  PET performance measurements using the NEMA NU 2-2001 standard.

Authors:  Margaret E Daube-Witherspoon; Joel S Karp; Michael E Casey; Frank P DiFilippo; Horace Hines; Gerd Muehllehner; Vilim Simcic; Charles W Stearns; Lars-Eric Adam; Steve Kohlmyer; Vesna Sossi
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 10.057

3.  Model-based normalization for iterative 3D PET image reconstruction.

Authors:  B Bai; Q Li; C H Holdsworth; E Asma; Y C Tai; A Chatziioannou; R M Leahy
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2002-08-07       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of AMG 531, a novel thrombopoietin receptor ligand.

Authors:  Bing Wang; Janet L Nichol; John T Sullivan
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 6.875

5.  Alternating minimization algorithms for transmission tomography.

Authors:  Joseph A O'Sullivan; Jasenka Benac
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 10.048

6.  Virtual-pinhole PET.

Authors:  Yuan-Chuan Tai; Heyu Wu; Debashish Pal; Joseph A O'Sullivan
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2008-02-20       Impact factor: 10.057

7.  The positron emission mammography/tomography breast imaging and biopsy system (PEM/PET): design, construction and phantom-based measurements.

Authors:  Raymond R Raylman; Stan Majewski; Mark F Smith; James Proffitt; William Hammond; Amarnath Srinivasan; John McKisson; Vladimir Popov; Andrew Weisenberger; Clifford O Judy; Brian Kross; Srikanth Ramasubramanian; Larry E Banta; Paul E Kinahan; Kyle Champley
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2008-01-10       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  Design considerations for a limited angle, dedicated breast, TOF PET scanner.

Authors:  S Surti; J S Karp
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2008-05-06       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 9.  Intraoperative probes and imaging probes.

Authors:  E J Hoffman; M P Tornai; M Janecek; B E Patt; J S Iwanczyk
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  1999-08

Review 10.  Nuclear imaging in cancer theranostics.

Authors:  S Del Vecchio; A Zannetti; R Fonti; L Pace; M Salvatore
Journal:  Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 2.346

View more
  2 in total

1.  2D feasibility study of joint reconstruction of attenuation and activity in limited angle TOF-PET.

Authors:  Marina Vergara; Ahmadreza Rezaei; Georg Schramm; Maria Jose Rodriguez-Alvarez; Jose Maria Benlloch Baviera; Johan Nuyts
Journal:  IEEE Trans Radiat Plasma Med Sci       Date:  2021-05-12

2.  Augmented Whole-Body Scanning via Magnifying PET.

Authors:  Jianyong Jiang; Suranjana Samanta; Ke Li; Stefan B Siegel; Robert A Mintzer; Sanghee Cho; Maurizio Conti; Matthias Schmand; Joseph O'Sullivan; Yuan-Chuan Tai
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2020-10-28       Impact factor: 10.048

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.