| Literature DB >> 30665461 |
Matthew E B Hansen1, Meagan A Rubel2, Aubrey G Bailey3,4, Alessia Ranciaro1, Simon R Thompson1,5, Michael C Campbell1,6, William Beggs1, Jaanki R Dave1,7, Gaonyadiwe G Mokone8, Sununguko Wata Mpoloka9, Thomas Nyambo10, Christian Abnet11, Stephen J Chanock11, Frederic D Bushman3, Sarah A Tishkoff12,13.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Gut microbiota from individuals in rural, non-industrialized societies differ from those in individuals from industrialized societies. Here, we use 16S rRNA sequencing to survey the gut bacteria of seven non-industrialized populations from Tanzania and Botswana. These include populations practicing traditional hunter-gatherer, pastoralist, and agropastoralist subsistence lifestyles and a comparative urban cohort from the greater Philadelphia region.Entities:
Keywords: Adaptation; Agropastoralists; Diet; Genetics; Gut microbiome; Hunter-gatherers; Industrialization; Pastoralists; Rural populations; Sub-Saharan Africa
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30665461 PMCID: PMC6341659 DOI: 10.1186/s13059-018-1616-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Genome Biol ISSN: 1474-7596 Impact factor: 13.583
Fig. 1Map of the sampled population groups
Cohort metadata per population group, listing country, population name, subsistence practice, number of individuals, and age range
| Country | Population | Subsistence | Number (Total) | Number (Female) | Number (Male) | Age (Ave) | Age (Min) | Age (Max) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tanzania | Burunge | Agropastoralist | 11 | 10 | 1 | 48 | 22 | 70 |
| Sandawe | Agropastoralist | 12 | 10 | 2 | 47.2 | 33 | 61 | |
| Maasai | Pastoralist | 12 | 6 | 6 | 39.5 | 24 | 68 | |
| Hadza | Hunting and gathering | 25 | 10 | 15 | 44.2 | 19 | 90 | |
| Subtotals | 60 | 36 | 24 | 44.5 | 19 | 90 | ||
| Botswana | Bantu | Agropastoralist | 26 | 19 | 7 | 49.8 | 24 | 92 |
| Herero | Pastoralist | 8 | 7 | 1 | 44.5 | 19 | 77 | |
| San | Hunting and gathering | 20 | 15 | 5 | 28.0 | 18 | 42 | |
| Subtotals | 54 | 41 | 13 | 40.9 | 18 | 92 | ||
| USA | Philadelphia | Industrial agropastoralist | 12 | 4 | 8 | 26.2 | 22 | 33 |
| Totals | 126 | 81 | 45 | 41.2 | 18 | 90 |
Fig. 2The relative abundance per individual for the ten most common taxa, shown for the bacterial taxonomic rank of a Order and b Family. c The population distribution of the relative proportion of Bacteroidales per total of Bacteroidales and Clostridiales
Fig. 3Within group mean α and β diversity. a Shannon index. b Unweighted UniFrac distance distribution within group. c Weighted UniFrac distance distribution within group. The within-population mean Shannon diversity versus unweighted and weighted UniFrac distances are shown in d and e, respectively
Fig. 4PERMANOVA tests of the phylogenetic difference between pairs of groups, based on unweighted UniFrac (panels a, b, c) and weighted UniFrac (panels d, e, f). Shown are groups defined by country of origin (panels a, d), subsistence practice (panels b, e), and sex (panels c, f). The subsistence practices are abbreviated as US = western (Philadelphian), HG = hunter-gatherers (Hadza, San), AP = agropastoralists (Bantu agropastoralists, Burunge, Sandawe), and PA = pastoralists (Herero, Maasai). Bar in red denote pairs where the F-statistic p value is < 0.05
Fig. 5Principle coordinate analysis (PCoA) for weighted UniFrac distances. a The first two principle coordinates for all individuals in the study, where marker shape and color denote the population of origin. Sidebar (panels b and c) show the abundances of Prevotellaceae (Prev.), Bacteroidaceae (Bact.), and Ruminococcaceae (Rumi.) aligned to the first two principal coordinates. d Box-and-whisker distributions between each African population and the US samples, over all pairs of individuals
Fig. 6Box-and-whisker plots of relative abundances distributions per group for the taxa that varied significantly among groups by the ANCOM tests, where individuals are grouped by a traditional or industrial lifestyle, b country of origin, c population, and d traditional subsistence strategy