Dilip Menon1,2, Kaurab Singh1,2, Sneha M Pinto3, Ananya Nandy1,2, Neetika Jaisinghani1,2, Rintu Kutum4,2, Debasis Dash4,2, T S Keshava Prasad3,5, Sheetal Gandotra1,2. 1. Cardiorespiratory Disease Biology , CSIR-Institute of Genomics and Integrative Biology , Sukhdev Vihar, Mathura Road , New Delhi 110025 , India. 2. Academy of Scientific and Innovative Research (AcSIR) , Ghaziabad 201002 , India. 3. Center for Systems Biology and Molecular Medicine , Yenepoya Research Center, Yenepoya (Deemed to be University) , Mangalore 575018 , India. 4. Informatics and Big Data , CSIR-Institute of Genomics and Integrative Biology , Sukhdev Vihar, Mathura Road , New Delhi 110025 , India. 5. Institute of Bioinformatics , International Technology Park , Bangalore 560066 , India.
Abstract
Growing evidence suggests the importance of lipid metabolism in pathogenesis of tuberculosis. Neutral lipids form the majority of lipids in a caseous granuloma, a pathology characteristic of tuberculosis. Cytosolic lipid droplets (LDs) of macrophages form the store house of these lipids and have been demonstrated to contribute to the inflammatory response to infection. The proteome of lipid droplets reflects the mechanisms of lipid metabolism active under a condition. However, infection induced changes in the proteome of these dynamic organelles remains elusive. Here, we employed quantitative proteomics to identify alterations induced upon infection with live Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) in comparison with heat killed bacilli or uninfected macrophages. We found increased abundance of proteins coupled with lipid metabolism, protein synthesis, and vesicular transport function in LDs upon infection with live Mtb. Using biochemical methods and microscopy, we validated ADP-ribosyltransferase (Arf)-like 8 (ARL8B) to be increased on the lipid droplet surface of live Mtb infected macrophages and that ARL8B is a bonafide LD protein. This study provides the first proteomic evidence that the dynamic responses to infection also encompass changes at the level of LDs. This information will be important in understanding how Mtb manipulates lipid metabolism and defense mechanisms of the host macrophage.
Growing evidence suggests the importance of lipid metabolism in pathogenesis of tuberculosis. Neutral lipids form the majority of lipids in a caseous granuloma, a pathology characteristic of tuberculosis. Cytosolic lipid droplets (LDs) of macrophages form the store house of these lipids and have been demonstrated to contribute to the inflammatory response to infection. The proteome of lipid droplets reflects the mechanisms of lipid metabolism active under a condition. However, infection induced changes in the proteome of these dynamic organelles remains elusive. Here, we employed quantitative proteomics to identify alterations induced upon infection with live Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) in comparison with heat killed bacilli or uninfected macrophages. We found increased abundance of proteins coupled with lipid metabolism, protein synthesis, and vesicular transport function in LDs upon infection with live Mtb. Using biochemical methods and microscopy, we validated ADP-ribosyltransferase (Arf)-like 8 (ARL8B) to be increased on the lipid droplet surface of live Mtb infected macrophages and that ARL8B is a bonafide LD protein. This study provides the first proteomic evidence that the dynamic responses to infection also encompass changes at the level of LDs. This information will be important in understanding how Mtb manipulates lipid metabolism and defense mechanisms of the host macrophage.
Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb)
is a successful human pathogen capable of growth within macrophages
despite eliciting a robust innate and adaptive immune response. Part
of its success is attributed to inhibition of phagolysosome maturation
followed by egress to the cytosol.[1] While
the lysosome poses as a site of nutrient restriction, cytosolic escape
ensures access to a wider range of nutrients. The acquisition of lipids
is particularly challenging given the requirement of protein carriers
or vesicular systems for lipid transfer.[2] An emerging theme in TB pathogenesis is the manipulation of host
lipid metabolism by Mtb whereby fatty acids and cholesterol are routed
toward intracellular bacilli.[3−8] Cytosolic lipid droplets (LDs) are an important source of cholesterol
and fatty acids for intracellular mycobacteria,[9] yet whether these dynamic organelles are actively modulated
upon infection remains unaddressed.LDs are phospholipid monolayer
bound structures encasing neutral lipids such as triglycerides, cholesterol
esters, ether lipids, diacylglycerides, and retinyl esters and are
largely home to proteins that regulate lipid metabolism.[10] The neutral lipid and protein composition of
these organelles varies depending on cell type and metabolic state.
For example, LDs of adipocytes undergoing lipolysis increase recruitment
of ABHD5 and ATGL, enzymes that orchestrate triglyceride hydrolysis
via regulated interactions with the coat protein Perilipin 1A.[11] This regulates fatty acid supply from a major
storage depot. Muscle cells are highly responsive to fatty acid availability.
In the stimulated state, incoming fatty acids are metabolized via
mitochondrial beta oxidation while in the basal state they are stored
in the form of cytosolic LDs; the association of mitochondria with
LDs is key to drive this process.[12] The
absence of Perilipin 1A in skeletal muscle cells indicates a different
mechanism for regulation of lipid storage. While Perilipin 2 promotes
LD stability, Perilipin 3 and Perilipin 5 enable mitochondrial oxidative
metabolism of fatty acids in skeletal muscle cells.[13−16] In macrophages, where Perilipin
2 serves as the major LD coat protein, regulation of fatty acid mobilization
is not completely understood.[17,18]Emerging evidence
indicates cross talk between LDs and the ER membrane from which the
droplets emerge, the mitochondria to which they provide fatty acids
for oxidation, and the plasma membrane which regulates vectorial transfer
of exogenous fatty acids to LDs. More recently, the physical interaction
between various intracellular organelles has been quantitated using
live cell microscopy, revealing interaction between LDs and ER, mitochondria,
and lysosomes.[19] Given the central role
of LDs in nutrient balance within the cell and across organelles,
the role of macrophage LDs during infection, wherein host and bacteria
compete for nutrients, is an important area of investigation. Defined
alterations in LD proteome have been previously reported during different
physiological conditions, and differential localization of proteins
partly mediated the metabolic changes.[11] Therefore, determination of LD proteome is an important step in
understanding infection induced LD protein changes and their role
in host pathogen interaction.In this study, we investigated
the proteome level alterations in the LDs of human THP1 macrophages
induced upon infection with live Mtb. Using subcellular fractionation
to isolate LDs, followed by tandem mass tag (TMT) labeling of tryptic
digests of proteins in the LD fraction, we identified a total of 418
proteins. Fifty seven proteins were found to increase, and 29 proteins
were found to decrease in abundance in LD proteome from macrophages
infected with live Mtb compared to heat killed Mtb. Proteins associated
with protein synthesis, vesicular transport, and lysosomal function
were specifically found to be more abundant when compared with cells
infected with heat killed bacilli or uninfected cells. Our data identifies
the first proteome level evidence that Mtb hijacks the macrophage
LD during infection.
Results and Discussion
Qualitative Characterization
of LDs Isolated from Mtb Infected Human Macrophages
THP1
monocyte derived macrophages contain lipid droplets in the basal state
and exhibit Mtb infection induced alterations in lipid metabolism
that guide the inflammatory response to infection.[3,6] LDs
of THP1 macrophages are mainly coated with Perilipin 2 (PLIN2) (Figure a) and to some extent
with Perilipin 3 (PLIN3) but devoid of Perilipin 1 (PLIN1) (Figure S1). The presence of PLIN3 and PLIN1 detected
with the same antibodies on cytosolic vesicles and LDs in 3T3L1 adipocytes
confirmed PLIN2 to be the major LD coat protein of THP1 macrophages
(Figure S1). The buoyant property of lipid
droplets was utilized for their isolation using sucrose gradient ultracentrifugation
(Figure b). The top
1 mL of the 11 mL gradient was treated as the LD fraction. This method
led to purification of 80–100 μg of proteins in the LD
fraction from 15 T175 flasks (4.5 × 108 THP1 macrophages).
The relative purity of the LD fraction from contaminants of the endoplasmic
reticulum, mitochondria, cytosol, and nuclei was assessed by immunoblotting
for organelle specific markers. Relative enrichment of Perilipin 2
in fraction 1 and retention of all other organelle markers between
fractions 5 and 11 revealed successful flotation based enrichment
and purification of LDs in the topmost fraction (Figure c). Thin layer chromatography
of the total cell lysates, post-nuclear supernatant, and the LD fraction
revealed enrichment for neutral lipids and relative depletion of phospholipids
in fraction 1 from the subcellular fractionation, confirming purity
and enrichment of the LD fraction by our methodology (Figure d,e).
Figure 1
Characterization of LDs
of THP1 macrophages. (a) PLIN2 immunolocalization and BODIPY493/503
staining in THP1 macrophages. Individual channels in monochrome and
the merged colored images are shown: PLIN2 (green), BODIPY493/503
(red), DAPI (blue). (b) Experimental schematic. (c) Immunoblotting
for various subcellular markers on total cell lysate (T), nuclear
pellet (N), post-nuclear supernatant (PNS), and 1 mL fractions isolated
from top to bottom of the gradient after centrifugation. Blots include
organelle markers PLIN2 (LD), Calnexin (ER, ab10286), GAPDH (cytoplasm),
Lamin (nucleus), and VDAC2 (mitochondria). (d, e) Thin layer chromatogram
of lipids isolated from indicated fractions. 0.2% of total cell lysate
and PNS were loaded while 0.1% of the LD fraction was loaded. Standards
for 1,3-diacylglycerol (1,3-DAG), cholesterol (C), cholesterol ester
(CE), triacylglycerol (TG), phosphatidyl ethanolamine (PE), phosphatidyl
choline (PC), and phosphatidyl serine (PS) were used as indicated.
Characterization of LDs
of THP1 macrophages. (a) PLIN2 immunolocalization and BODIPY493/503
staining in THP1 macrophages. Individual channels in monochrome and
the merged colored images are shown: PLIN2 (green), BODIPY493/503
(red), DAPI (blue). (b) Experimental schematic. (c) Immunoblotting
for various subcellular markers on total cell lysate (T), nuclear
pellet (N), post-nuclear supernatant (PNS), and 1 mL fractions isolated
from top to bottom of the gradient after centrifugation. Blots include
organelle markers PLIN2 (LD), Calnexin (ER, ab10286), GAPDH (cytoplasm),
Lamin (nucleus), and VDAC2 (mitochondria). (d, e) Thin layer chromatogram
of lipids isolated from indicated fractions. 0.2% of total cell lysate
and PNS were loaded while 0.1% of the LD fraction was loaded. Standards
for 1,3-diacylglycerol (1,3-DAG), cholesterol (C), cholesterol ester
(CE), triacylglycerol (TG), phosphatidyl ethanolamine (PE), phosphatidyl
choline (PC), and phosphatidyl serine (PS) were used as indicated.The aim of this work was to understand
how infection with the lipid metabolizing pathogen, Mtb, alters the
LD proteome of human macrophages. Toward this goal, we compared macrophages
infected with live and heat killed bacilli using TMT labeling based
quantitative proteomics. The use of heat killed Mtb served as a control
for particles with same size as that of live Mtb, with the retention
of the lipidic surface that is recognized by the host macrophage as
if it were live bacilli.[20,21] Any active modulation
of the host responses by proteins or newly synthesized metabolites
would be missing in the case of infection with heat killed Mtb. This
comparison would therefore allow us to look at actively induced changes
rather than changes brought about by phagocytosis and surface recognition.
The time point and multiplicity of infection was chosen such that
infection induced cell death does not preclude equal isolation efficiency
across conditions (Figure a,b). We determined that continuous infection for 14 h at
multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 3 led to minimal necrotic cell
death (Figure a) and
equivalent abundance of total protein being isolated from macrophages
infected with either live Mtb or heat killed Mtb (Figure b). Approximately 72% cells
were found to be infected with at least one bacterium under these
conditions of infection (Figure c).
Figure 2
Selection of multiplicity of infection for lipid droplet
isolation. (a) Cell death quantified by LDH release assay from supernatant
of macrophages that were either uninfected or infected with the indicated
multiplicity of infection of Mtb H37Rv. (b) Protein profile of lipid
droplet fraction isolated from MOI3 and MOI5 of infection, obtained
by silver staining of an SDS-PAGE gel. (c) Infectivity depicted from
representative images upon infection at indicated multiplicity of
infection, captured on a 43× objective using Floid microscope.
Numbers indicate % infected cells as mean ± SD from ten representative
fields (number of cells captured = 1572 for MOI1, 1161 for MOI3, and
1661 for MOI5). The top panel is a monochrome image of mCherry expressing
strain of H37Rv, and the lower panel is a merge of the phase contrast
image and the bacteria (red). Scale bar = 125 μm.
Selection of multiplicity of infection for lipid droplet
isolation. (a) Cell death quantified by LDH release assay from supernatant
of macrophages that were either uninfected or infected with the indicated
multiplicity of infection of Mtb H37Rv. (b) Protein profile of lipid
droplet fraction isolated from MOI3 and MOI5 of infection, obtained
by silver staining of an SDS-PAGE gel. (c) Infectivity depicted from
representative images upon infection at indicated multiplicity of
infection, captured on a 43× objective using Floid microscope.
Numbers indicate % infected cells as mean ± SD from ten representative
fields (number of cells captured = 1572 for MOI1, 1161 for MOI3, and
1661 for MOI5). The top panel is a monochrome image of mCherry expressing
strain of H37Rv, and the lower panel is a merge of the phase contrast
image and the bacteria (red). Scale bar = 125 μm.
Alterations in the LD Proteome Induced upon
Live Mtb Infection
On the basis of the above methodology,
we isolated LDs from heat killed and live Mtb infected macrophages
14 h post-infection with MOI3 across two independent experiments and
acetone precipitated the proteins, followed by trypsinization and
TMT labeling of the peptides for quantitative mass spectrometry. Mass
spectrometry analysis carried out in technical triplicates using high
resolution mass spectrometry enabled the most comprehensive identification
of proteins (Figure a). We identified a total of 418 proteins with high confidence (1%
FDR) and completed an additional manual check of those identified
with a single unique peptide for reliable spectra (Tables S1 and S2). Of these, 239 were identified with 2 or
more unique peptides and 161 proteins were identified with a single
unique peptide with 2 or more PSMs. Both PLIN2 and -3 were identified
with 17 and 4 unique peptides, respectively, while no peptides were
identified for PLIN1 as expected on the basis of immunostaining data.
Figure 3
Summary
of LD proteome in THP1 macrophages during Mtb infection. (a) Outline
of the workflow: Lipid droplets were isolated from macrophages that
were infected with either heat killed or live Mtb. The LD fraction
was delipidated and trypsinized, and peptides thereof subjected to
TMT labeling as indicated (in technical triplicates), followed by
mass spectrometry. Experiments 1 and 2 are biological replicates (R1
and R2 indicate biological replicates for conditions, and T1, T2,
and T3 indicate technical replicates). (b) Volcano plot representing
significantly differentially abundant (FDR adjusted p-value <0.05) proteins; pink region reflects proteins increased
by a ratio of >1.3 while blue region reflects protein decreased
by a ratio <0.7 (live Mtb/heat killed Mtb). (c) Hierarchical clustering
of differentially abundant proteins representing z scores of normalized abundance values from all technical and biological
replicates. (d) Functional classification of 86 differentially abundant
proteins listed in (c).
Summary
of LD proteome in THP1 macrophages during Mtb infection. (a) Outline
of the workflow: Lipid droplets were isolated from macrophages that
were infected with either heat killed or live Mtb. The LD fraction
was delipidated and trypsinized, and peptides thereof subjected to
TMT labeling as indicated (in technical triplicates), followed by
mass spectrometry. Experiments 1 and 2 are biological replicates (R1
and R2 indicate biological replicates for conditions, and T1, T2,
and T3 indicate technical replicates). (b) Volcano plot representing
significantly differentially abundant (FDR adjusted p-value <0.05) proteins; pink region reflects proteins increased
by a ratio of >1.3 while blue region reflects protein decreased
by a ratio <0.7 (live Mtb/heat killed Mtb). (c) Hierarchical clustering
of differentially abundant proteins representing z scores of normalized abundance values from all technical and biological
replicates. (d) Functional classification of 86 differentially abundant
proteins listed in (c).Prior to differential abundance analysis, we performed a
surrogate variable analysis to regress out batch effects arising due
to the specific mass spectrometry run (technical replicates) or day
of performing lipid droplet isolation (biological replicates) (Table S3).[22] This
was performed for 258 proteins that were detected in all three technical
replicates. Unsupervised hierarchical clustering revealed that indeed
LD proteome abundance profiles of heat killed Mtb and live Mtb were
reproducibly distinct (Figure S2). This
analysis revealed 86 proteins to be statistically differentially abundant
using a pairwise comparison of heat killed and live Mtb infection
(adjusted p-value <0.05) (Figure b,c and Table S4). Of these, 57 were increased in abundance (fold change cutoff of
>1.3-fold), and 29 were decreased in abundance (fold change cutoff
of <0.7-fold) in the live versus heat killed group (Figure c and Table S4).Gene Ontology based classification of these 86 differentially
abundant proteins (Figure c) revealed enrichment for “catalytic activity”
as the chief molecular function (Table S4). Further manual curation of the literature enabled us to classify
the differentially abundant proteins better on the basis of the biological
process (Figure d
and Table S4). The majority of the differentially
abundant proteins were found to be involved in “metabolism”,
followed by “signal transduction” and “vesicular
trafficking”. Within the category of metabolism, we found enzymes
involved in lipid metabolism to be mainly increased: Hydroxysteroid
17-beta dehydrogenases (HSD17B7 and HSD17B4), lanosterol synthase
(LSS), retinol dehydrogenase 10 (RDH10), long chain acyl-CoA synthases
(ACSL3 and ACSL4), methyltransferase 7B (METTL7B), and zinc metallopeptidase
STE24 (ZMPSTE24). In contrast, fatty acid binding protein 4 (FABP4)
was significantly reduced upon live Mtb infection. Recent data on
dual metabolomics and transcriptomics has revealed an increase in
cholesterol biosynthetic flux in THP1 macrophages in response to cholesterol
depletion imposed by intracellular Mtb.[4] An increase in the abundance of proteins involved in cholesterol
biosynthesis (HSD17B7, HSD17B4, and LSS) in the LD proteome may be
an important aspect of regulating this process. Our previous work
using pulse chase experiments has demonstrated increased lipolytic
flux in Mtb infected macrophages with an increased rate of exogenous
fatty acid flux toward intracellular bacteria rather than host lipid
droplets.[5] We therefore expected signatures
of active lipolysis to be detected in the proteome analysis. While
no lipase was detected, we found differential abundance of ACSL3,
ACSL4, METTL7B, and FABP4. ACSL3 and METTL7B are known to localize
to specialized domains of the endoplasmic reticulum where LD synthesis
initiates[23,24] while FABP4 is known to transfer fatty acids
released from lipolysis for beta oxidation.[25] A decrease in FABP4 and increase in ACSL3 and ACSL4 in live Mtb
infected macrophage lipid droplet proteome suggest that free fatty
acids liberated by lipolysis are likely not rapidly removed from the
lipid droplets of live Mtb infected cells but may be utilized by ACSL3
and ACSL4 for re-esterification locally to other lipids. ZMPSTE24
is a lamin processing enzyme, deficiency or inhibition of which leads
to lipodystrophy.[26] The increased abundance
of this protease in the lipid droplet proteome indicates a possible
role in signaling that affects lipid metabolism during Mtb infection.Proteins belonging to DNA binding function and immune response,
like lymphocyte cytosolic protein (LCP1), S100 calcium binding protein
4 (S100A4), and S100A11, were only found to decrease in the LD proteome
upon infection. LCP1, an actin modulator, is highly expressed in macrophages,
monocytes, and neutrophils. In mice, it is known to be essential for
an innate immune response to lung pathogens.[27] S100A proteins are cytosolic calcium binding proteins that regulate
many cellular functions. The levels of S100A8/A9 in murine TB lesions
and serum of TB patients directly have been associated with the extent
of inflammatory lung damage.[28] In addition,
S100A11 has been found to be part of a multigene blood based signature
of active tuberculosis infection in humans.[29] The regulated abundance of LCP1 and S100A proteins on lipid droplets
might be important for the function of these proteins in inflammatory
response to infection.Proteins belonging to vesicular trafficking
function were surprisingly only found to increase in the LD proteome
upon infection. Fourteen proteins belong to this category which mainly
includes small GTPases (ADP-ribosyltransferase (Arf)-like 8 (ARL8B),
RAS related GTP binding proteins RAB1B, RAB6A, RAB7B, RAB8B, RAB10,
and RAB21, and Rac family small GTPase 2 (RAC2)), followed by motor
and cytoskeleton function associated with vesicle trafficking (myosin
light chain components (MYL6 and MYL12A), myosin heavy chain 9 (MYH9),
and tubulins (TUBB6, TUBA1A)).
ARL8B Localization to the
LD Is Increased by Mtb
Enrichment of specific proteins associated
with vesicular transport with LDs in live Mtb infected cells was intriguing.
We biochemically verified one of the candidates, ARL8B, to be enriched
in the LD fraction of live Mtb infected cells while the total cellular
levels of ARL8B were comparable between heat killed and live Mtb infection
(Figure a). We tested
the possibility that ARL8B could have either increased in the LD proteome
of live Mtb infected cells as an active phenomenon or decreased in
the LD proteome in response to phagocytosis that perhaps live Mtb
prevented. To test this, we compared the abundance of ARL8B in the
LD fraction of live Mtb infected macrophages and uninfected macrophages.
LD fraction from live Mtb infected macrophages exhibited increased
abundance of ARL8B in comparison to uninfected macrophages, supporting
an active modulation of the LD proteome (Figure b). No difference was found in the total
levels of ARL8B between uninfected and live Mtb infected cell lysates.
We sought to investigate the pattern of localization of endogenous
ARL8B on macrophage LDs. Using commercially available antibodies specific
to ARL8B, we observed punctate staining throughout the cytoplasm (data
not shown), as reported previously.[30] In
order to minimize the cytosolic signal and ensure only membrane localized
signal is detected, we permeabilized cells with 0.01% digitonin prior
to fixing them. ARL8B positive punctae were clearly visible on the
surface of LDs (Figure c). The density of the punctae was calculated per LD after normalizing
for the LD surface area. The density of ARL8B fluorescence per LD
was 6272–7784 (95% CI of median) in uninfected macrophages,
7652–9649 in macrophages infected with live Mtb, and 5748–7578
in macrophages infected with heat killed Mtb (Figure d).
Figure 4
ARL8B is enriched in LDs of live Mtb infected
macrophages. (a, b). Immunoblotting of total cell lysate (T) and LD
fraction (LD) of macrophages infected with heat killed (HK) or live
Mtb infected macrophages and uninfected macrophages with antibodies
against ARL8B, PLIN2, and GAPDH. (c) Confocal images of endogenous
ARL8B immunolocalization (green) relative to LDs stained with BODIPY665/676
(red) in THP1 macrophages. Nuclear staining with DAPI is shown in
blue. Scale bar = 5 μm. (d) Quantification of ARL8B signal per
LD in uninfected and infected (with live or heat killed (HK) Mtb)
macrophages. ***p < 0.001 from the Kruskal–Wallis
test. Data are from 311 to 361 LDs per group, representative of two
independent experiments.
ARL8B is enriched in LDs of live Mtb infected
macrophages. (a, b). Immunoblotting of total cell lysate (T) and LD
fraction (LD) of macrophages infected with heat killed (HK) or live
Mtb infected macrophages and uninfected macrophages with antibodies
against ARL8B, PLIN2, and GAPDH. (c) Confocal images of endogenous
ARL8B immunolocalization (green) relative to LDs stained with BODIPY665/676
(red) in THP1 macrophages. Nuclear staining with DAPI is shown in
blue. Scale bar = 5 μm. (d) Quantification of ARL8B signal per
LD in uninfected and infected (with live or heat killed (HK) Mtb)
macrophages. ***p < 0.001 from the Kruskal–Wallis
test. Data are from 311 to 361 LDs per group, representative of two
independent experiments.ARL8B is a small GTPase, which allows the movement of lysosomes
toward the cell periphery, through its interaction with tubulin,[31] and recruits protein machinery required for
phagolysosome fusion.[32,33] We identified several endosomal
(RAB5 (early endosome), RAB7 (late endosome)) and lysosomal (lysosomal
associated membrane protein 1 (LAMP1), late endosomal/lysosomal adaptor,
MAPK and MTOR activator 1 (LAMTOR1), and scavenger receptor class
B member 2 (SCARB2)) proteins in our LD proteome data and verified
their presence using immunolocalization with PLIN2 (Figure S3a–o). These markers exhibited a range of colocalization
rates with PLIN2, with the lowest for RAB5 and highest for RAB7 (Figure S3p). However, neither these nor other
abundant lysosomal proteins such as sphignomyelinase were found to
be differentially abundant like ARL8B, suggesting a specific role
of ARL8B on lipid droplets. Consistent with published reports of ld-lysosome interaction,[19] we observed
dynamic “kiss-and-run” interactions (Figure S3q, Movies S1 and S2) or a more stable “hovering”
type of interactions between lysosomes that moved along the surface
of the LD (Figure S3q), consistent with
recent spatiotemporal organelle interaction data from the Lippincott-Schwartz
group.[19] Together, these data suggested
possible cross talk of lipid droplets with lysosome function but the
enrichment of ARL8B to be independent of a generalized contamination
of lysosomes to LDs of live Mtb infected cells.To further test
if ARL8B is a bonafide LD protein, we asked whether mCherry-tagged
ARL8B can localize the fluorophore to LDs. We aimed to generate stable
expression of this protein in THP1 monocytes and then differentiate
them into macrophages. We consistently observed loss in fluorescence
while trying to generate this line and therefore switched to generating
a stable line of RAW264.7 macrophages expressing ARL8B-mCherry. As
reported previously,[31,34] ARL8B-mCherry localized to LAMP1+ lysosomes in RAW264.7 cells (Figure a). The colocalization rate of ARL8B-mCherry
with LAMP1 was found to be approximately 60% (Figure b). To study LD localization, we treated
these macrophages with oleic acid to induce LD biogenesis and imaged
them using structured illumination microscopy. ARL8B-mCherry localized
to BODIPY493/503 stained LDs in addition to defined ring-like structures
and continuous tubular structures within the cytoplasm (Figure c). To confirm if ARL8B-mCherry
can localize to purified LDs, we isolated LDs from ARL8B-mCherry and
mCherry expressing cells treated with oleic acid to similar relative
purity (Figure d).
ARL8B-mCherry was found to be present in the LD fraction while mCherry
was not (Figure e).
Similar abundance of LAMP1 in the LD fraction of ARL8B-mCherry and
mCherry overexpressing RAW cells verified that ARL8B localization
in the LD fraction is independent of possible increased lysosomal
contamination (Figure e). These data suggested that ARL8B is a bonafide LD protein in addition
to its well-known lysosome associated function and likely affects
lipid metabolism during Mtb infection.
Figure 5
ARL8B is a bonafide LD
associated protein. (a) ARL8B-mCherry colocalization with LAMP1+ organelles (lysosomes) in RAW264.7 cells. Scale bar = 10
μm. (b) Quantification of colocalization rate of ARL8B-mCherry
and LAMP1 in RAW264.7 cells. (c) mCherry and ARL8B-mCherry (red) localization
relative to lipid droplets stained with BODIPY665/676 (pseudocolored
in green) in RAW264.7 cells loaded with oleic acid. The left panel
shows the maximum intensity projection while the middle and right
panel show indicated z stacks of a SIM image. Scale
bar = 5 μm. (d) Thin layer chromatogram of lipids isolated from
indicated fractions: total cell lysate (T) and LD fraction (LD). 0.2%
of total cell lysate while 4% of the LD fraction was loaded. Standards
for diacylglycerol (DAG), cholesterol (C), cholesterol ester (CE),
and triacylglycerol (TG) are indicated. (e) Immunoblotting for mCherry,
LAMP1, and PLIN2 in LDs isolated from RAW264.7 cells in (b) and (c).
* represents possible degradation product of ARL8B-mCherry.
ARL8B is a bonafide LD
associated protein. (a) ARL8B-mCherry colocalization with LAMP1+ organelles (lysosomes) in RAW264.7 cells. Scale bar = 10
μm. (b) Quantification of colocalization rate of ARL8B-mCherry
and LAMP1 in RAW264.7 cells. (c) mCherry and ARL8B-mCherry (red) localization
relative to lipid droplets stained with BODIPY665/676 (pseudocolored
in green) in RAW264.7 cells loaded with oleic acid. The left panel
shows the maximum intensity projection while the middle and right
panel show indicated z stacks of a SIM image. Scale
bar = 5 μm. (d) Thin layer chromatogram of lipids isolated from
indicated fractions: total cell lysate (T) and LD fraction (LD). 0.2%
of total cell lysate while 4% of the LD fraction was loaded. Standards
for diacylglycerol (DAG), cholesterol (C), cholesterol ester (CE),
and triacylglycerol (TG) are indicated. (e) Immunoblotting for mCherry,
LAMP1, and PLIN2 in LDs isolated from RAW264.7 cells in (b) and (c).
* represents possible degradation product of ARL8B-mCherry.
Active Manipulation of
the LD Proteome by Mtb
Proteins could be observed to be higher
in the live Mtb condition compared to the heat killed and also due
to the possibility that response to heat killed Mtb might suppress
the amount of protein localized to the lipid droplet while live Mtb
may not be able to do so. Similarly, proteins that appeared to decrease
by live Mtb infection could have been increased by macrophages in
response to heat killed bacilli while live Mtb infection might not
affect these proteins. In this study, we wanted to find proteins that
were increased or decreased specifically by live Mtb infection, and
the scale of the lipid droplet isolation experiment precluded us from
performing a three-way comparison together. Therefore, we also performed
TMT labeling of LD proteins of uninfected and live Mtb infected macrophages
from an independent experiment (Table S5), and using the same criteria of >1.3- and <0.7-fold in all
three technical replicates, we searched for differentially abundant
proteins. Of 86 proteins previously identified to be differentially
abundant between heat killed and live Mtb infection, 42 proteins were
found to be differentially abundant in the same direction of change
between uninfected and live Mtb infected macrophages (Figure S4a and Table S6). Proteins belonging
to vesicular trafficking and protein synthesis were the most enriched
class in this common set of proteins.Ribosomal proteins were
also part of this active manipulation of the LD proteome imposed by
live Mtb. Ribosomal protein L11 was identified with the highest number
of unique peptides (three) and peptide spectral matches (20 eight)
from the group of ribosomal proteins found to be differentially abundant.
We verified differential abundance of RPL11 in the LD fraction of
live Mtb infected cells and uninfected cells (Figure S4b). In order to be able to detect low levels of possible
ER contamination, we used a more sensitive antibody to calnexin. Using
this antibody, we were able to identify contamination of calnexin
in the LD fraction, consistent with its presence in our LD proteome
data. Interestingly, while we saw an increase in RPL11 in the LD fraction
of live Mtb infected cells, there was no change in the level of calnexin,
consistent with our LD proteome data. Enrichment of neutral lipids
as opposed to phospholipids further proved that the fraction was largely
devoid of ER contamination (Figure S4c,d). This suggests that the increased abundance of ribosomal proteins
in the LD fraction of live Mtb infected cells may be a selective enrichment
of ribosome containing microdomains of the ER to be enriched[20] on LDs rather than increased contamination of
the endoplasmic reticulum in these samples. Interestingly, silencing
of RpLP0, a ribosomal protein in Drosophila S2 cells, resulted in
condensation of lipid droplets close to each other.[35] Therefore, enrichment of ribosomal proteins may be significant
to the mobilization of lipids from lipid droplets during TB infection.Active modulation of the LD proteome was also evident for vesicular
trafficking proteins such as ARL8B, RAC2, MYL6, MYL12A, MYH9, TUBB6,
and TUBA1A. The alterations orchestrated by Mtb in the lipid droplet
proteome could be a consequence of lipid changes that affect protein
recruitment or a mechanism of lipid mobilization in infected cells.
It is interesting to note that, even though we observe lipolysis in
infected cells,[5] we did not identify altered
levels of lipases in the LD proteome of infected cells. This suggests
that alternative mechanisms such as fragmentation of lipid droplets
may be operative to bring about lipolysis. The molecular basis of
this process is not well-defined, but the process is common to hormonally
stimulated lipolysis wherein an increase in surface to volume ratio
of the droplets ensures rapid degradation of the lipids.[36] Previous studies have identified factors that
regulate lipid droplet size and dispersion in other model systems.
Silencing of the vesicular transport proteins Arf79F, garz (ARF-guanine nucleotide exchange factor),
and COPI led to fewer and dispersed droplets. In addition, shifting
from lipid rich media to starvation led to a loss of droplets from
control cells while Arf79F silenced cells contained
larger lipid droplets and exhibited poorer lipolysis. In a separate
study, nonmuscle-myosin IIa (MYH-9) was found to play a role in dispersion
of droplets, thereby affecting LD surface-to-volume ratio.[37] Drawing parallels with our findings, we suspect
vesicular transport pathways to drive metabolic changes rather than
recruitment of lipases. We cannot rule out the role of mycobacterial
secreted lipases in this process which may be difficult to identify
despite a highly sensitive mass spectrometry approach owing to the
dilution relative to the host proteome. Activity based proteomics
has revealed a large number of putative lipases in Mtb proteome that
are differentially regulated under normoxia and hypoxia.[38,39] Recently, the mycobacterial protein LipY has been demonstrated to
be important for lipid consumption from the host and assimilation
into bacteria.[8] On the basis of our findings,
we speculate that host factors are made to synergize with bacterial
cell surface/secreted lipases to divert host lipids toward bacteria.
Mechanistically, we envisage secreted virulence factors of Mtb to
play a role in this active manipulation of the proteome, and targeted
deletions of these might be useful in the future to understand mechanisms
of hijacking of the LD proteome by Mtb.
Conclusion
Mtb,
a pathogen adept at utilizing host lipids, is understood as being
capable of this feat by expression of a large number of genes involved
in lipid metabolism. However, host macrophages utilize specific organelles
for lipid storage and mobilization, and the bacteria must compete
with the host machinery to make use of these lipids. Moreover, given
the role of host triglyceride synthesis machinery in the inflammatory
response to infection, the lipid droplet proteome may play a larger
role in dictating host response to infection. This study was an attempt
to address if the proteome of lipid droplets, organelles that store
host lipids, is actively modulated by Mtb. Using quantitative proteomics,
we found that Mtb could affect abundance of several proteins associated
with lipid droplets. These proteins largely belonged to protein synthesis,
vesicular trafficking, and lipid metabolism. Our data points toward
possible mechanisms whereby Mtb might manipulate the host nutrient
storage system to its advantage. Future studies will be aimed at understanding
mechanisms of this manipulation by active processes of the bacilli.
Experimental
Section
Cell Lines and Strains
THP1 monocytes (ECACC #88081201)
were procured from Sigma. Mtb H37Rv was a kind gift from Dr. Vivek
Rao. Monocytes were cultured in RPMI media containing 1 mM sodium
pyruvate, 2 mM glutamax, and 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS). Monocyte
to macrophage differentiation was induced by treatment with 100 nM
phorbol myristate acetate (PMA) for 24 h followed by culturing in
media without PMA for another 48 h. RAW264.7 macrophages (ATCC#TIB-71)
were maintained in RPMI media containing 1 mM sodium pyruvate, 2 mM
glutamax, and 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS). Mtb was cultured in 7H9
with 0.05% Tween 80 and ADC supplementation (Difco) under shaking
conditions or in a roller bottle.
Infection
Mtb
was grown to an OD600 nm of 0.4 to 0.6. Cultures were
harvested by centrifugation at 3000 rpm in a swing out bucket rotor
for 5 min, washed with phosphate buffered saline (PBS) with 0.05%
Tween 80 twice, and then resuspended in PBS. Bacterial cell suspensions
were centrifuged at 800 rpm in a swing out bucket rotor for 12 min.
The supernatant was carefully transferred using a pipet into another
tube and treated as the single cell suspension (SCS). Optical density
of the SCS was measured at 600 nm, and bacterial density was calculated
as per the conversion of 1 OD = 5 × 108 bacilli/mL.
Macrophages were infected at a multiplicity of infection of 3 for
14 h in half the volume of media used for normally culturing the macrophages.
For preparation of heat killed Mtb, the single cell suspension was
heated at 95 °C for 15 min, cooled to RT, and then added in media
for infection.
Infectivity Analysis
To quantify
the percentage of infectivity of macrophages, PMA differentiated THP1
macrophages were infected with Mycobacterium tuberculosis (mCherry expressing) at MOIs of 1, 2, 3, and 5
for 16 hours. After 16 h of infection, cells were washed twice with
PBS and fixed with 4% methanol free formaldehyde. These fixed cells
were thereafter stained with cell mask deep red at 1 μg/mL concentration
for half an hour at room temperature. These samples were washed thrice
with PBS and imaged using an IN CELL 6000 high content image analyzer
(GE health care) at 10× magnification. Percentage of infectivity
of cells was estimated by an image analysis protocol generated using
an IN CELL developer toolbox. Briefly, macrophages were counted using
fluorescence in the cell mask channel, and cell mask signal colocalizing
with mCherry (bacteria) fluorescence was used to identify infected
cells.
LD Isolation
THP1 monocytes were
seeded at a density of 3.0 × 107/T175 flask in 100
nM PMA for 24 h, followed by exchange with PMA free media and another
2 days in culture. At this point, they were infected as described
above. LDs were isolated from 15 T175 flasks for each condition using
previously described methods[40] adapted
to BSL3 conditions. Cells were gently scraped in media and then centrifuged
in a swing out bucket rotor at 200g for 15 min. The
cell pellet was washed twice in PBS and then resuspended in 2.5 mL
of lysis buffer A’ (20 mM Tris, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM EGTA, 100 mM
KCl buffer (pH 7.4)), followed by incubation on ice for 5 min. Cell
lysis was completed using nitrogen cavitator by applying nitrogen
gas at 750 psi for 5 min. The cell lysate was collected in 15 mL conical
tubes to which 2.5 mL of Buffer B’ (20 mM Tris, 1 mM EDTA,
1 mM EGTA, 100 mM KCl buffer, 1.08 M sucrose (pH 7.4)) was added and
mixed. This was treated as the total cell lysate. The total cell lysate
was centrifuged at 900g for 10 min. The supernatant
so obtained was treated as the post-nuclear supernatant (PNS). The
PNS was layered under a gradient (from top to bottom) of 1 mL of Buffer
E (25 mM Tris HCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM EGTA), 2 mL of Buffer D (20 mM
Tris, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM EGTA, 100 mM KCl buffer, 0.13 M sucrose (pH
7.4)), and 2 mL of Buffer C (20 mM Tris, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM EGTA, 100
mM KCl buffer, 0.27 M sucrose (pH 7.4)) in a quick seal bell top polyallomer
tube (Beckman Coulter Cat #344622). A 1 mL cushion of Buffer B’
was layered under the post-nuclear supernatant. All the buffers used
contained protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche). The tubes were sealed
and centrifuged at 32 000 rpm for 4 h in a SW32.1 Ti rotor
in a Beckman Coulter Optima XPN-100 ultracentrifuge. One milliliter
fractions from the top were collected. For delipidation of proteins,
the LD fraction (fraction 1 from the top) was mixed with 4 volumes
of ice cold acetone and incubated overnight at −20 °C,
followed by centrifugation at 13 000g for
30 min and acetone washing. The protein pellets were air-dried and
then resuspended in 100 μL of 50 mM triethylammonium bicarbonate
buffer (TEABC; pH 8.0) containing 0.1% SDS.
Quantitative Mass Spectrometry
Protein concentration of the LD fraction obtained from three independent
experiments was estimated using Qbit. The extracted peptides were
lyophilized, and an equal amount of protein from each condition was
used for TMT labeling. Labels used for each condition, infected with
heat killed Mtb (experiment 1), infected with live Mtb (experiment
1), infected with heat killed Mtb (experiment 2), infected with live
Mtb (experiment 2), uninfected (experiment 3), infected with live
Mtb (experiment 3), were TMT channels 126, 127, 128, 129, 130, and
131, respectively. Labeled peptides were purified, pooled, and analyzed
in three technical replicates using an Orbitrap Fusion Tribrid mass
spectrometer. Full details on sample preparation are provided in the Supporting Information.
Database Searches for Peptide
and Protein Identification
Raw data files were processed
to generate peak list files, and the data were searched against the
human RefSeq protein database (version 75) (downloaded from NCBI,
updated June, 2016) combined with common contaminants (total number
of sequences: 26 976 proteins) appended using SequestHT and
Mascot (version 2.5.1) search algorithms available through Thermo
Proteome Discoverer 2.1 software suite (version 2.1.0.81/Thermo Fisher
Scientific, Bremen Germany). The following search parameters were
considered: maximum missed cleavage of 1, trypsin specified as proteolytic
enzyme with minimum peptide length set to 7 amino acids. The precursor
and fragment mass tolerance were set at 10 ppm and 0.05 Da, respectively.
TMT modification at peptide N-termini and lysine residues and carbamidomethylation
of cysteine were set as fixed modifications and oxidation of methionine,
as variable modification. Reporter ion quantifier node was employed
for peak integration and reporting intensities at MS3 level. A Sequest
XCorr value of >2 or MASCOT Ion score of >30 was used for identification
of peptides. Consensus workflow was employed to group PSMs and validate
PSM and peptides as well as carry out protein grouping and report
FDR at PSM, peptide, and protein level. For reporter ion quantification,
both unique and razor peptides were considered. Reporter quantification
was performed on the basis of reporter ion intensity. The percolator
node available in the software suite was employed to calculate the
false discovery rate (FDR) at the PSM level. The data were searched
against both forward and a reverse decoy database, and the PSM validation
was based on q-value. The peptide and protein validator
nodes were employed in the consensus workflow to obtain peptides at
1% FDR. The FDR at PSM and peptide level was <1%, and at protein
level, the FDR is <3%. For data normalization, the reporter ion
intensities for each condition were normalized to the median of that
sample. Normalized abundance values after regressing out technical
and batch effects as described under “Statistical Rationale”
(Supporting Information) was used for differential
abundance analysis.
Microscopy
Cells were fixed in 4%
methanol free formaldehyde and then permeabilized, blocked, and probed
with primary antibodies overnight and Alexa tagged secondary antibodies
for 1 h. The detailed protocol is provided in the Supporting Information. For detecting endogenous ARL8B, a
similar procedure as above was followed except that cells were permeabilized
with 0.01% digitonin (5 min) prior to fixing them with 4% methanol
free formaldehyde (25 min). Nonspecific epitopes were blocked with
3% BSA in PHEM buffer containing 0.05% Tween 20. Subsequently, ARL8B
antibody incubation (1:200) was performed at 4 °C for an overnight
period. ARL8B immunoreactivity was detected using Alexa 488 conjugated
goat antirabbit antibody, and LDs were stained using BODIPY 665/676.
Coverslips were mounted in ProLong Diamond antifade reagent with or
without DAPI (Life Technologies) and imaged using a Leica SP8 confocal
microscope.
Cloning and Transfection
ARL8B-HA
constructs were a kind gift from Dr. Mahek Sharma (IISER, Mohali).
ARL8B was PCR amplified and cloned in frame with mCherry as a C terminal
fusion tag under the CMV promoter in pcDNA3.1. The fragments were
then subcloned using KpnI and NotI sites into pcDNA3.1 derivative
in which the CMV promoter was replaced with the human EF1 promoter
for stable expression in macrophages. For generating stable lines,
RAW264.7 macrophages were transfected using lipofectamine LTX as per
supplier’s instructions and 48 h later selected on 800 μg/mL
G418 until only mCherry positive cells were selected. LDs from these
and mCherry expressing stable RAW264.7 cells were isolated 48 h post-treatment
with 150 μM oleic acid conjugated to BSA (Sigma O3008) with
the same protocol as described for THP1 cells, using five T75 flasks
for each group. For microscopy based experiments, cells were seeded
at a density of 30 000 per well on a 24 well plate with a #1.5
coverslip. Six hours later, macrophages were loaded with oleic acid
conjugated to BSA for 18 h and then fixed for microscopy.
Structured
Illumination Microscopy
Samples were prepared as described
for confocal microscopy. Structured illumination microscopy (SIM)
images were collected with a N-SIM illumination system using a 100×
oil objective lens with a numerical aperture of 1.4 at room temperature
and equipped with an Andor iXon EMCCD Scientific Camera DU-897 and
PCI-Controller DU-897 camera. Five phases and 3 rotation angles of
the excitation grid were acquired for each z plane,
with z spacing of 100 nm between planes in the 3D
SIM mode. SIM processing was performed with the N-SIM module of the
NIS Elements software (Nikon).
Authors: Silvia Turró; Mercedes Ingelmo-Torres; Josep M Estanyol; Francesc Tebar; Manuel A Fernández; Cecilia V Albor; Katharina Gaus; Thomas Grewal; Carlos Enrich; Albert Pol Journal: Traffic Date: 2006-09 Impact factor: 6.215
Authors: Sofia Axelrod; Hartmut Oschkinat; Jana Enders; Brigitte Schlegel; Volker Brinkmann; Stefan H E Kaufmann; Albert Haas; Ulrich E Schaible Journal: Cell Microbiol Date: 2008-03-21 Impact factor: 3.715
Authors: Lauren E Deady; Elizabeth M Todd; Chris G Davis; Julie Y Zhou; Nermina Topcagic; Brian T Edelson; Thomas W Ferkol; Megan A Cooper; Jared T Muenzer; Sharon Celeste Morley Journal: Infect Immun Date: 2014-03-04 Impact factor: 3.441
Authors: Amit Tuli; Jerome Thiery; Ashley M James; Xavier Michelet; Mahak Sharma; Salil Garg; Keri B Sanborn; Jordan S Orange; Judy Lieberman; Michael B Brenner Journal: Mol Biol Cell Date: 2013-10-02 Impact factor: 4.138
Authors: Juan Antonio Vizcaíno; Attila Csordas; Noemi Del-Toro; José A Dianes; Johannes Griss; Ilias Lavidas; Gerhard Mayer; Yasset Perez-Riverol; Florian Reisinger; Tobias Ternent; Qing-Wei Xu; Rui Wang; Henning Hermjakob Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 2016-09-28 Impact factor: 16.971
Authors: Evgeniya V Nazarova; Christine R Montague; Thuy La; Kaley M Wilburn; Neelima Sukumar; Wonsik Lee; Shannon Caldwell; David G Russell; Brian C VanderVen Journal: Elife Date: 2017-06-27 Impact factor: 8.140
Authors: Jaqueline Batista de Lima; Lana Patricia da Silva Fonseca; Luciana Pereira Xavier; Barbarella de Matos Macchi; Juliana Silva Cassoli; Edilene Oliveira da Silva; Rafael Borges da Silva Valadares; José Luiz Martins do Nascimento; Agenor Valadares Santos; Chubert Bernardo Castro de Sena Journal: Pathogens Date: 2021-05-28