| Literature DB >> 33102245 |
Krishnaveni Mohareer1, Jayashankar Medikonda1, Govinda Raju Vadankula1, Sharmistha Banerjee1.
Abstract
Mitochondria, are undoubtedly critical organelle of a eukaryotic cell, which provide energy and offer a platform for most of the cellular signaling pathways that decide cell fate. The role of mitochondria in immune-metabolism is now emerging as a crucial process governing several pathological states, including infection, cancer, and diabetes. Mitochondria have therefore been a vulnerable target for several bacterial and viral pathogens to control host machinery for their survival, replication, and dissemination. Mycobacterium tuberculosis, a highly successful human pathogen, persists inside alveolar macrophages at the primary infection site, applying several strategies to circumvent macrophage defenses, including control of host mitochondria. The infection perse and specific mycobacterial factors that enter the host mitochondrial milieu perturb mitochondrial dynamics and function by disturbing mitochondrial membrane potential, shifting bioenergetics parameters such as ATP and ROS, orienting the host cell fate and thereby infection outcome. In the present review, we attempt to integrate the available information and emerging dogmas to get a holistic view of Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection vis-a-vis mycobacterial factors that target host mitochondria and changes therein in terms of morphology, dynamics, proteomic, and bioenergetic alterations that lead to a differential cell fate and immune response determining the disease outcome. We also discuss critical host factors and processes that are overturned by Mycobacterium tuberculosis, such as cAMP-mediated signaling, redox homeostasis, and lipid droplet formation. Further, we also present alternate dogmas as well as the gaps and limitations in understanding some of the present research areas, which can be further explored by understanding some critical processes during Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection and the reasons thereof. Toward the end, we propose to have a set of guidelines for pursuing investigations to maintain uniformity in terms of early and late phase, MOI of infection, infection duration and incubation periods, the strain of mycobacteria, passage numbers, and so on, which all work as probable variables toward different readouts. Such a setup would, therefore, help in the smooth integration of information across laboratories toward a better understanding of the disease and possibilities of host-directed therapy.Entities:
Keywords: M1; M2; Mycobacterium tuberculosis; bioenergetics; immuno-metabolism; macrophage response; mitochondria
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33102245 PMCID: PMC7554303 DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2020.00457
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Cell Infect Microbiol ISSN: 2235-2988 Impact factor: 5.293
Figure 1Schematic representation of the link between mitochondrial bioenergetics and cellular metabolism, cell response, and cell fate. The products of glycolysis from cytoplasm enter the TCA cycle in the mitochondrion, which generates reducing equivalents, such as NADH, the electrons from which enter the electron transport chain (ETC) located in the inner mitochondrial membrane (IMM). The bioenergetics of mitochondria is related to the coupled electron flow through ETC complexes with the generation of a proton gradient used by ATP synthase (Comp V) to produce ATP. Instead of getting transferred across, some electrons leak out through specific sites in ETC and interact with oxygen, leading to the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS). Some protons routinely leak into the mitochondrial matrix across the inner mitochondrial membrane. This is called a proton leak, which can be basal or induced. Basal protein leak is attributed to the lipid bilayer of the inner mitochondrial membrane and the adenine nucleotide translocase, while induced proton leaks are mediated by uncoupling proteins (UCPs). Mild uncoupling and proton leak is protective to cells against generating excessive ROS. ROS causes oxidative modifications of important proteins such as kinases, phosphatases, ion-channels, caspases, amongst others, with the levels of ROS determining benefit or harm to the cell. The ROS produced by Complex III is released into the mitochondrial matrix and inter-membrane space (IMS). Superoxide dismutase (SOD1) can convert ROS present in IMS into H2O2, which can diffuse out of mitochondria and contribute to perturbations in cellular metabolism and pathological responses. Induction of mitochondrial uncoupling results in the dissipation of the mitochondrial proton gradient across IMM, and decrease mitochondrial membrane potential (Ψm), which modifies ROS generation, inhibits oxidative-phosphorylation (OXPHOS), induction of autophagy and many related changes in cellular physiology and cell fate (Demine et al., 2019).
List of diverse cell types used for investigation of host-pathogen interactions between Mycobacterium tuberculosis (and model systems thereof) and different cell types at the mitochondrial interface.
| Human | THP-1 | 10 | 24 h | Increased electron density, with a clear and vivid definition of the cristae | Modest increase in TNF-α | Increased as compared to uninfected cells | Mitochondrial membrane transition potential was significantly increased than H37Ra | Modest increase in both apoptosis and necrosis | (Riendeau and Kornfeld, | |
| Dead | 5 | 24 h | Slightly reduced as compared to untreated cells | Oxygen consumption rate as in basal respiration, total respiration, proton leak, and TCA are reduced slightly as compared to uninfected THP-1 but much higher than | No effect | (Cumming et al., | ||||
| 10 | 24 h | A significant reduction in the electron density of the matrix outlines of the cristae were distinct and there was no gross pathology of the mitochondria | TNF-α | Mitochondrial membrane potential was significantly lower than H37Rv | Apoptosis | (Jamwal et al., | ||||
| BCG | 10 | 24 h | Significant increase in TNF-α | Non-mitochondrial respiration is more than that induced by | Generates superoxide radicals | Significant increase in apoptosis | (Riendeau and Kornfeld, | |||
| U937 | 10 | 1–5 days | ΔMMP increased greater with H37Rv than H37Ra but similarly with MOI > 5 | Modest increase in apoptosis and necrosis (day3 onwards) | (Danelishvili et al., | |||||
| Jurkat T cells | rRv1818c-Tat | 1–15 μg/ml | 24 h | Rv1818c localizes to mitochondria | Caspase dependent apoptosis | (Balaji et al., | ||||
| RD (sarcoma) | Transient expression of PE_PGRS33 | 1 μg plasmid with Lipofectamine | 24 h | PE_PGRS33 localizes to mitochondria | Apoptosis (24 h onwards) and necrosis (late stage-48 h onwards) | (Cadieux et al., | ||||
| PBMC derived macrophages | 2–10 | 0–48 h | At MOI = 5, H37Rv caused more MMP and cytC release at 6 h | Modest increase in apoptosis 48 h and necrosis(72 h) | (Chen et al., | |||||
| PBMC derived dendritic cells | 1–10 | 24–48 h | DC maturation | Non-apoptotic cell death | Caspase independent | (Ryan et al., | ||||
| alveolar epithelial cells (A549 type II epithelial cells) | 10, 100 | 6–24 h | No effect | No inflammasome activation | No effect | Necrosis (post 48 h) | (Dobos et al., | |||
| Murine | macrophage cell line RAW 264.7 | H37Rv | 10–20 | 1–4 days | Localizes to mitochondria | Dose dependent LDH release | Loss of membrane potential, Bax translocation, Cyt C release | Necrosis in a dose and time-dependent manner | (Sohn et al., |
The above list includes a diverse array of cell types used in mycobacterial research with details of variables of experimental conditions (Specific strain, MOI, incubation time post-infection) with mitochondria-associated readouts such as morphological changes, Bioenergetic changes, and cell fate. It is be noted that it is not an exhaustive list of all model cell types and mycobacterial strains used in mycobacterial research.
Figure 2Schematic representation of various cell fates upon Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. The figure depicts the Mtb proteins that are demonstrated to translocate to mitochondria and their role in induction or inhibition of cell death modalities. The proteins, lipids, and carbohydrates that are either secreted or on the surface of Mtb are recognized by host pattern recognition receptors (majorly TLR2). The several proteins secreted by Mtb target various host organelles, of which mitochondria is a crucial target. Specific Mtb proteins, as discussed in the text, are reported to translocate to the mitochondrial membrane, wherein they cause a change in MMP, leading to Cytochrome C release and, subsequently, apoptosis. The specific pathway differs for each Mtb protein with differences in the source of perturbation, such as the generation of ROS, changes in Ca2+ dynamics, and mitochondrial fission. Some proteins are not reported to translocate to mitochondria, but their activities ripple their effect on mitochondria, such as TNT, which causes NAD+ depletion leading to increased ROS generation in mitochondria. The receptors, including TLR, TNF, IL-1R, NOD, signal through various combinations of adaptor proteins that result in specific signaling pathways and diverse outcomes such as apoptosis, necrosis, necroptosis, and autophagy as described in the text. The figure depicts the Mtb proteins that are demonstrated to translocate to mitochondria and their role in the induction or inhibition of cell death modalities. One of the several Mtb proteins that inhibit apoptosis by interacting with mitochondrial mortalin is Cpn60.2. (H). LpqH (A) and PE_PGRS33 (D) interact with TLR2 (C) and induces apoptosis through TNF-α. In the intracellular milieu, Mtb factors upon translocation to mitochondria and causes a change in MMP and leads to apoptosis (E). Mtb lipids such as Man-LAM can bind to TLR2/CD36 and signal PPAR- γ resulting in proinflammatory cytokines (B). HBHA is another secreted Mtb protein that causes apoptosis by changing MMP (G). LprG causes changes in Ca2+ dynamics and mitochondrial fission that leads to MMPT and, thus, apoptosis (F). One of the secreted proteins, TNT, hydrolyzes NAD resulting in the accumulation of ROS, and finally, necroptosis (I). The major secreted virulent protein, ESAT-6, causes ER stress that is transferred to mitochondria and finally culminating in apoptosis (J). It may be noted that the early phase of infection is dominated by either apoptosis that leads to bacterial clearance or anti-apoptosis that promotes bacterial survival and growth (M1). Once Mtb survives the host pro-inflammatory responses, it takes over by modulating the host metabolism by anti-inflammatory cytokines and alterations in lipid metabolism that inhibit apoptosis and autophagy coinciding with the M2 phase. As cell death is one of the major outcomes of perturbation in mitochondrial activities with or without getting targeted by mycobacterial factors, for a comprehensive list of cell death modulators from Mtb, please refer (Mohareer et al., 2018). The mycobacterial proteins are marked in purple boxes. The figure has been made using the Biorender app.
Figure 3Schematic representation of immunometabolic and bioenergetic changes in a macrophage infected with Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Upon Mtb infection, host macrophage is activated by sensing several bacterial proteins, lipids, carbohydrates through various receptors (such as IL-1R, TLR2, CD36). The macrophage activation leads to a multitude of hostile cellular, immunological, metabolic, bioenergetic changes toward bacterial clearance, denoted as M1. The M1 phase is characterized by an increased glycolytic flux (A), known as the Warburg-like effect. The changes during this phase are mainly brought about by NFkB (B) and HIF-1α (C), which induce the transcription of glycolytic enzymes. At the immunological front, pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines, including IL-1α/β, IL-6, IL-12, CXCL9, and CCL10, are secreted (F), which directly or indirectly contribute to bacterial clearance. During this phase, ROS is generated that is channeled into phagosomes to impose oxidative stress and as a signal for various cell death modalities. However, in the M2 phase, Mtb takes control over the cell and modulates the immunological, metabolic, and bioenergetic processes with the induction of PPAR-γ (I), PGC-1α and STAT-6 (G). They contribute to dampening the pro-inflammatory responses by secretion of IL-10 and alter lipid metabolism (H), favoring carbon rerouting through fatty acids and accumulation of fatty acids in the form of lipid droplets (D,I), converting the macrophages to what are known as “foamy macrophages.” PPAR-γ also contributes to the synthesis of PGE2 and COX2 (I), which inhibit apoptosis and divert the cell toward necrosis, a cell death mode essential for the dissemination of Mtb. ESAT-6 signals to converts the M1 phase to M2 by reinforcing the GPR109A pathway, which has anti-lipase activity (E).The pathways related to M1 are shown in blue dotted lines, and those related to M2 are shown in solid pink lines. The upper panel (K–M) shows the distinctions in the internal membrane structure of mitochondria and the changes in bioenergetic metabolism with accumulated metabolites and up-regulated enzymes in red. The metabolic changes take a turn through increased glycolytic flux (A) and decreased OXPHOS in M1 as compared to M0 compare upper panels (K,L). The TCA cycle breaks at two points contributing to the accumulation of succinate, itaconate, and α-ketoglutarate (K), which display microbicidal properties at various points. The TCA cycle is reinstated in M2, where Mtb takes control of host macrophage by modulating host defenses through altered energy metabolism. NADP oxidase subunits occur more abundantly upon infection in the mitochondrial membranes. Besides, the Ca2+ dynamics play a key role in the homeostasis of mitochondria; an increased Ca2+ level causes mitochondrial fragmentation, which co-relates with the increased presence of fission proteins (DRP1/MFF) and decreased presence of fusion proteins (MFN1/2). Bioenergetic processes are altered as compared to M0 with decreased OXPHOS, ATP (L) that correlates with the decreased number of ATP synthase subunits. The figure has been made using the Biorender app.
Host directed therapy targeting mitochondrial functions toward tuberculosis management.
| 1 | Metformin | Phosphorylates mTOR and p70S6k | Autophagy | (Naicker et al., |
| 2 | M1 | Mitochondrial fusion | Restores Mitochondrial functions | (Asalla et al., |
| 3 | Cystamine/cysteamine | Transglutaminase | increasing glutathione and L-cysteine level | (Palucci et al., |
| 4 | Statins | HMG CoA reductase | Autophagy | (Palucci and Delogu, |
| 5 | Alisporivir | PTP inhibitor cyclophilin D | Inhibits ROS | (Šileikyte and Forte, |
| 6 | VitD3 | Stimulates vitamin D receptor and induces cathelicidin expression as well as Atg5 and Beclin-1 | Autophagy | (Palucci and Delogu, |
| 7 | Aspirin ibuprofen zileuton | Block eicosanoids | Modulates inflammation through classical COX-dependent inhibition of prostaglandins | (Tobin, |
| 8 | H-89/ETB089 | cAMP-dependent PKA inhibitor | Enhance Autophagy | (Kuijl et al., |
| 9 | Pioglitazone, rosiglitazone, and treprostinil | PPAR-γ | Regulate genes of glucose and lipid metabolism and decrease triglycerides and increase insulin uptake | (Rask-Andersen et al., |
| 10 | Mepenzolate bromide | G-protein-coupled receptor GPR109A pathway | bacterial burden was reduced in cell culture and in mouse | (Singh et al., |
| 11 | Rapamycin | mTOR | Enhances autophagy | (Singh and Subbian, |
| 12 | Cyclosporine corticosteroids | MMT inhibitors | Inhibit necrosis | (Gan et al., |