Literature DB >> 30644808

Ultra-Low Radiation Dose CT Fluoroscopy for Percutaneous Interventions: A Porcine Feasibility Study.

Martin G Wagner1, J Louis Hinshaw1, Yinsheng Li1, Timothy P Szczykutowicz1, Paul Laeseke1, Charles A Mistretta1, Fred T Lee1.   

Abstract

Purpose To determine the feasibility of ultra-low-dose (ULD) CT fluoroscopy for performing percutaneous CT-guided interventions in an in vivo porcine model and to compare radiation dose, spatial accuracy, and metal artifact for conventional CT versus CT fluoroscopy. Materials and Methods An in vivo swine model was used (n = 4, ∼50 kg) for 20 procedures guided by 246 incremental conventional CT scans (mean, 12.5 scans per procedure). The procedures were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee and performed by two experienced radiologists from September 7, 2017, to August 8, 2018. ULD CT fluoroscopic acquisitions were simulated by using only two of 984 conventional CT projections to locate and reconstruct the needle, which was superimposed on a previously acquired and motion-compensated CT scan. The authors (medical physicists) compared the ULD CT fluoroscopy results to those of conventional CT for needle location, radiation dose, and metal artifacts using Deming regression and generalized mixed models. Results The average distance between the needle tip reconstructed using conventional CT and ULD CT fluoroscopy was 1.06 mm. Compared with CT fluoroscopy, the estimated dose for a percutaneous procedure, including planning acquisitions, was 0.99 mSv (21% reduction) for patients (effective dose) and 0.015 µGy (97% reduction) for physicians (scattered dose in air). Metal artifacts were statistically significantly reduced (P < .001, bootstrapping), and the average registration error of the motion compensation was within 1-3 mm. Conclusion Ultra-low-dose CT fluoroscopy has the potential to reduce radiation exposure for intraprocedural scans to patients and staff by a factor of approximately 500 times compared with conventional CT acquisition, while maintaining image quality without metal artifacts. © RSNA, 2019.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30644808      PMCID: PMC6438357          DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2019181362

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  24 in total

Review 1.  Real-time CT fluoroscopy: evolution of an interventional tool.

Authors:  B Daly; P A Templeton
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Precise biopsy localization by computer tomography.

Authors:  J R Haaga; R J Alfidi
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1976-03       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Comparison of freehand-navigated and aiming device-navigated targeting of liver lesions.

Authors:  D Wallach; G Toporek; S Weber; R Bale; G Widmann
Journal:  Int J Med Robot       Date:  2013-07-08       Impact factor: 2.547

4.  Respiratory motion compensation for CT-guided interventions in the liver.

Authors:  Lena Maier-Hein; Sascha A Müller; Frank Pianka; Stefan Wörz; Beat P Müller-Stich; Alexander Seitel; Karl Rohr; Hans-Peter Meinzer; Bruno M Schmied; Ivo Wolf
Journal:  Comput Aided Surg       Date:  2008-05

5.  Prior image constrained compressed sensing (PICCS): a method to accurately reconstruct dynamic CT images from highly undersampled projection data sets.

Authors:  Guang-Hong Chen; Jie Tang; Shuai Leng
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  CT-assisted transbronchial needle aspiration: usefulness of CT fluoroscopy.

Authors:  C S White; P A Templeton; J D Hasday
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  CT-guided interventions using a free-hand, optical tracking system: initial clinical experience.

Authors:  Tilman Schubert; Augustinus L Jacob; Michele Pansini; David Liu; Andreas Gutzeit; Sebastian Kos
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  2012-12-12       Impact factor: 2.740

8.  Radiation dose optimization for CT-guided interventional procedures in the abdomen and pelvis.

Authors:  Ramit Lamba
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2014-01-11       Impact factor: 5.532

9.  An evaluation of three commercially available metal artifact reduction methods for CT imaging.

Authors:  Jessie Y Huang; James R Kerns; Jessica L Nute; Xinming Liu; Peter A Balter; Francesco C Stingo; David S Followill; Dragan Mirkovic; Rebecca M Howell; Stephen F Kry
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2015-01-14       Impact factor: 3.609

10.  Radiation doses during CT fluoroscopy.

Authors:  E L Nickoloff; A Khandji; A Dutta
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 1.316

View more
  3 in total

1.  In vivo performance of gold nanoparticle-loaded absorbable inferior vena cava filters in a swine model.

Authors:  Steven Y Huang; Jossana A Damasco; Li Tian; Linfeng Lu; Joy Vanessa D Perez; Katherine A Dixon; Malea L Williams; Megan C Jacobsen; Stephen J Dria; Mitchell D Eggers; Adam D Melancon; Rick R Layman; Elizabeth M Whitley; Marites P Melancon
Journal:  Biomater Sci       Date:  2020-06-19       Impact factor: 6.843

2.  Low-dose CT with tin filter combined with iterative metal artefact reduction for guiding lung biopsy.

Authors:  Jing Zhang; Meiling Liu; Daihong Liu; Xiaoqin Li; Meng Lin; Yong Tan; Yuesheng Luo; Xiangfei Zeng; Hong Yu; Hesong Shen; Xiaoxia Wang; Leilei Liu; Yuchuan Tan; Jiuquan Zhang
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2022-02

3.  Ultralow dose computed tomography protocol for hook-wire localization of solitary pulmonary nodules prior to video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Bo Liu; Jie Fang; Haipeng Jia; Zhigang Sun; Jian Liao; Hong Meng; Fengmin Pan; Chunhai Li
Journal:  Thorac Cancer       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 3.500

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.