Literature DB >> 11089804

Radiation doses during CT fluoroscopy.

E L Nickoloff1, A Khandji, A Dutta.   

Abstract

CT fluoroscopy (CTF) is a relatively new imaging modality that is particularly useful for performing complex biopsy procedures. Despite the obvious benefits, the potential exists to deliver considerable radiation doses to both the patients and medical staff. The purpose of our study was to quantify the radiation levels based upon typical clinical procedures. To assess the potential radiation risks, the patient radiation doses via the CT dose index (CTDI) method were measured during CTF for a GE Pro-Speed CT scanner using standardized head and body phantoms and a CT ionization chamber. The measurements were performed for a variety of kVp, mA, and slice thickness settings. To determine patient radiation doses, the CT kVp, mA, and total CTF scan times were recorded for various biopsy procedures. To determine the radiation doses to the hands of the radiologists, a radiation survey meter was used to measure the scattered radiation from standard phantoms. The effectiveness of various types of leaded gloves and shields were also determined. The measured CTDI values ranged from 20.4 cGy min(-1) to 63.1 cGy min(-1) of CTF. For a group of 78 patients, the clinically utilized imaging times varied from 13.0 to 407 s with an mean time of 96.6 s +/- 78.9 s (1 standard deviation). The scattered x-ray radiation at the position of the radiologists hands performing the biopsy procedures was measured to be 0.6 to 1.5 mGy min(-1). The thin leaded gloves provided a relatively minimal reduction in the scattered radiation to the hands between 11% and 44% dependent upon the kVp and the type of glove. However, floor mounted radiation shields reduced the scattered radiation levels to the body by 94% to 99%. In comparison to standard x-ray fluoroscopy, CTF employs much higher radiation dose rates due to the higher kVp, mA, and rotating geometry. It is important to minimize the radiation dose to patients and staff by limiting the imaging times, employing lower mA settings, and using appropriate radiation protection measures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11089804     DOI: 10.1097/00004032-200012000-00013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Phys        ISSN: 0017-9078            Impact factor:   1.316


  8 in total

1.  Robotically driven interventions: a method of using CT fluoroscopy without radiation exposure to the physician.

Authors:  Stephen B Solomon; Alexandru Patriciu; Mark E Bohlman; Louis R Kavoussi; Dan Stoianovici
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  [CT fluoroscopy].

Authors:  P Rogalla; R Juran
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 3.  Personal dosimetry for interventional operators: when and how should monitoring be done?

Authors:  C J Martin
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Radiation dose reduction in computed tomography: techniques and future perspective.

Authors:  Lifeng Yu; Xin Liu; Shuai Leng; James M Kofler; Juan C Ramirez-Giraldo; Mingliang Qu; Jodie Christner; Joel G Fletcher; Cynthia H McCollough
Journal:  Imaging Med       Date:  2009-10

5.  Ultra-Low Radiation Dose CT Fluoroscopy for Percutaneous Interventions: A Porcine Feasibility Study.

Authors:  Martin G Wagner; J Louis Hinshaw; Yinsheng Li; Timothy P Szczykutowicz; Paul Laeseke; Charles A Mistretta; Fred T Lee
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2019-01-15       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Evaluation of surface dose and image quality using the half-scan mode in chest computed tomography-guided interventional radiology: a phantom study.

Authors:  Hiroaki Hasegawa; Jiro Sato; Ikuo Kobayashi
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2018-02-27

7.  Comparison of CT Fluoroscopy-Guided Manual and CT-Guided Robotic Positioning System for In Vivo Needle Placements in Swine Liver.

Authors:  F Cornelis; H Takaki; M Laskhmanan; J C Durack; J P Erinjeri; G I Getrajdman; M Maybody; C T Sofocleous; S B Solomon; G Srimathveeravalli
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  2014-11-07       Impact factor: 2.740

8.  Dose management in CT facility.

Authors:  V Tsapaki; M Rehani
Journal:  Biomed Imaging Interv J       Date:  2007-04-01
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.