Literature DB >> 31813091

Quantitative assessment of microcalcification cluster image quality in digital breast tomosynthesis, 2-dimensional and synthetic mammography.

Andreas E Petropoulos1, Spyros G Skiadopoulos1, Anna N Karahaliou1, Gerasimos A T Messaris2, Nikolaos S Arikidis1, Lena I Costaridou3.   

Abstract

Quantitative assessment of microcalcification (MC) cluster image quality is presented, in terms of cluster signal-difference-to-noise ratio (SDNR) intercomparison among digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) and 2-dimensional (2D) and synthetic-2-dimensional (s2D) mammography. A phantom that provides realistic appearance of MC clusters located in uniform and nonuniform background was imaged in 2D and DBT, considering various scattering conditions. MC cluster SDNR differentiation is investigated with respect to MC particle size (uniform background) and surrounding parenchyma density (nonuniform background). An accurate MC cluster segmentation method was used to delineate individual MC particles and estimate MC cluster SDNR. Analysis of the uniform part of the phantom indicated higher performance of DBT and 2D over s2D for the smallest cluster size (106-177 μm), no difference among mammographic modes for the largest MC cluster (224-354 μm), and enhanced role of 2D for decreasing cluster size and increasing scattering. Analysis of the nonuniform part of the phantom indicated DBT performed better than 2D and s2D in case of dense parenchyma pattern, while 2D and s2D did not differ across parenchyma density patterns and scattering conditions. The presented MC cluster SDNR analysis was capable of revealing subtle differences among mammographic modes and suggests a methodology for clinical image quality assessment. Graphical abstract.

Keywords:  Digital breast tomosynthesis; Digital mammography; Microcalcification cluster; Signal-difference-to-noise ratio; Synthetic 2D images

Year:  2019        PMID: 31813091     DOI: 10.1007/s11517-019-02072-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput        ISSN: 0140-0118            Impact factor:   2.602


  33 in total

1.  A two-stage method for microcalcification cluster segmentation in mammography by deformable models.

Authors:  N Arikidis; K Vassiou; A Kazantzi; S Skiadopoulos; A Karahaliou; L Costaridou
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  A comparative study of physical image quality in digital and synthetic mammography from commercially available mammography systems.

Authors:  Paola Baldelli; Marco Bertolini; Adriano Contillo; Giuseppe Della Gala; Paola Golinelli; Laura Pagan; Stefano Rivetti; Angelo Taibi
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2018-08-23       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 3.  A review of breast tomosynthesis. Part II. Image reconstruction, processing and analysis, and advanced applications.

Authors:  Ioannis Sechopoulos
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Dependency of image quality on system configuration parameters in a stationary digital breast tomosynthesis system.

Authors:  Andrew W Tucker; Jianping Lu; Otto Zhou
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  The effect of system geometry and dose on the threshold detectable calcification diameter in 2D-mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis.

Authors:  Andria Hadjipanteli; Premkumar Elangovan; Alistair Mackenzie; Padraig T Looney; Kevin Wells; David R Dance; Kenneth C Young
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2017-01-10       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Implementation of Synthesized Two-dimensional Mammography in a Population-based Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Program.

Authors:  Samantha P Zuckerman; Emily F Conant; Brad M Keller; Andrew D A Maidment; Bruno Barufaldi; Susan P Weinstein; Marie Synnestvedt; Elizabeth S McDonald
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2016-07-28       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Clinical Performance of Synthesized Two-dimensional Mammography Combined with Tomosynthesis in a Large Screening Population.

Authors:  Mireille P Aujero; Sara C Gavenonis; Ron Benjamin; Zugui Zhang; Jacqueline S Holt
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2017-02-21       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Microcalcifications Detected at Screening Mammography: Synthetic Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis versus Digital Mammography.

Authors:  Yi-Chen Lai; Kimberly M Ray; Amie Y Lee; Jessica H Hayward; Rita I Freimanis; Iryna V Lobach; Bonnie N Joe
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2018-10-02       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 9.  Calcifications at Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Imaging Features and Biopsy Techniques.

Authors:  Joao V Horvat; Delia M Keating; Halio Rodrigues-Duarte; Elizabeth A Morris; Victoria L Mango
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2019-01-25       Impact factor: 5.333

10.  Breast cancer diagnosis: analyzing texture of tissue surrounding microcalcifications.

Authors:  Anna N Karahaliou; Ioannis S Boniatis; Spyros G Skiadopoulos; Filippos N Sakellaropoulos; Nikolaos S Arikidis; Eleni A Likaki; George S Panayiotakis; Lena I Costaridou
Journal:  IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed       Date:  2008-11
View more
  1 in total

1.  Automated Segmentation of Mass Regions in DBT Images Using a Dilated DCNN Approach.

Authors:  Jianming Ye; Weiji Yang; Jianqing Wang; Xiaomei Xu; Liuyi Li; Chun Xie; Gang Chen; Xiangcai Wang; Xiaobo Lai
Journal:  Comput Intell Neurosci       Date:  2022-02-02
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.