| Literature DB >> 30625152 |
Yara Seif1, Jonathan M Monk1, Nathan Mih1, Hannah Tsunemoto2, Saugat Poudel1, Cristal Zuniga1, Jared Broddrick1, Karsten Zengler1,3, Bernhard O Palsson1,2,3.
Abstract
S. aureus is classified as a serious threat pathogen and is a priority that guides the discovery and development of new antibiotics. Despite growing knowledge of S. aureus metabolic capabilities, our understanding of its systems-level responses to different media types remains incomplete. Here, we develop a manually reconstructed genome-scale model (GEM-PRO) of metabolism with 3D protein structures for S. aureus USA300 str. JE2 containing 854 genes, 1,440 reactions, 1,327 metabolites and 673 3-dimensional protein structures. Computations were in 85% agreement with gene essentiality data from random barcode transposon site sequencing (RB-TnSeq) and 68% agreement with experimental physiological data. Comparisons of computational predictions with experimental observations highlight: 1) cases of non-essential biomass precursors; 2) metabolic genes subject to transcriptional regulation involved in Staphyloxanthin biosynthesis; 3) the essentiality of purine and amino acid biosynthesis in synthetic physiological media; and 4) a switch to aerobic fermentation upon exposure to extracellular glucose elucidated as a result of integrating time-course of quantitative exo-metabolomics data. An up-to-date GEM-PRO thus serves as a knowledge-based platform to elucidate S. aureus' metabolic response to its environment.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30625152 PMCID: PMC6326480 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006644
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS Comput Biol ISSN: 1553-734X Impact factor: 4.475
Fig 5Comparison of flux distribution across two condition-specific GEMs.
(A) The reactions that were shown to significantly differ in their flux distribution (determined by the Kolmogorov-Smirnoff test) between the CDMG- and CDM-specific GEM are shown. The width of the arrows qualitatively represents the median flux value across 10,000 sampled fluxes. The blue arrows represent the flux simulation results for the CDM-specific GEM and the red arrows represent the flux simulations of the CDMG-specific GEM. The13C labelled intracellular metabolites detected by NMR in both conditions are highlighted in red (metabolic intermediates derived from extracellular glucose in CDMG) and in blue (metabolic intermediates derived from nine extracellular amino acids in CDM) [79]. Metabolites highlighted in grey are present in the extracellular medium (note that D-glucose is only present in CDMG). (B) Differential cycling of ammonium (as well as several cofactors) between the two GEMs highlights the relative contribution to the production and consumption of ammonium for all reactions utilizing or synthesizing ammonium in CDM (blue) and CDMG (red). Several metabolic processes contribute to the ammonium pool in CDM (including the glycine cleavage system) while serine dehydrogenase is the main source of ammonium in CDMG.
Summary of the modifications made to the starting model.
A single instance is counted towards a metabolite even when it appears in two different subsystems.
| Metabolic processes | Unique ORF assignments | Unique metabolites | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 110 | 283 | 0 | |
| 1440 | 854 | 1094 | |
| 566 | 214 | 209 | |
| 637 | 41 | 253 | |
| 1511 | 691 | 1138 | |
| 764 | 367 | 0 |
Results of growth simulations for iYS864 on seven defined media.
| Simulated medium | Observed Growth | Simulated Growth | Proposed supplementations | Growth upon supplementation | Anaerobic Growth upon supplementation | Anaerobic Growth upon supplementation in the presence of nitrate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.92475 | None | 1.92475 | 0.115168 | 0.858722 | |
| 1 | 2.92622 | None | 2.92622 | 1.24279 | 1.90119 | |
| 1 | 3.02115 | None | 3.02115 | 1.2914 | 1.96277 | |
| 1 | 0 | Zinc AND Molybdate | 3.58009 | 1.59875 | 3.03455 | |
| 0 | 0 | Thiamin AND Nicotinamide | 1.3081 | 0.621565 | 1.21695 | |
| 0 | 0 | Mn2+ AND Zinc AND Fe2+ AND Molybdate | 3.74914 | 1.59E-15 | -3.54E-14 | |
| 1 | 0 | Fe2+ | 3.10515 | 1.3839 | 2.62512 |