| Literature DB >> 30610252 |
Antoine Leuzy1, Claudia Cicognola2, Konstantinos Chiotis1, Laure Saint-Aubert1,3,4, Laetitia Lemoine1, Niels Andreasen5, Henrik Zetterberg2,6,7,8, Keqiang Ye9, Kaj Blennow2,6, Kina Höglund2,6, Agneta Nordberg10,11.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Studies comparing CSF and PET tau biomarkers have included only commercial CSF assays examining specific phosphorylation sites (e.g. threonine 181, P-tau181p) and mid-domain tau (i.e. total tau, T-tau). Moreover, these studies did not examine CSF tau levels in relation to cerebral glucose metabolism. We thus aimed to examine CSF tau measures, using both commercial and novel assays, in relation to [18F]THK5317 (tau) and [18F]FDG PET (glucose metabolism).Entities:
Keywords: Alzheimer’s disease; CSF; PET imaging; Tau; [18F]FDG; [18F]THK5317
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30610252 PMCID: PMC6451715 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-018-4242-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging ISSN: 1619-7070 Impact factor: 9.236
Demographic, clinical and CSF data
| Prodromal AD | AD dementia | AD combined | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Number of patients | |||
| Baseline | 7 | 7 | 14 |
| Follow-up | 6a | 4 | 10 |
| Age at baseline (years) | 65 [62, 73.5] | 64 [59, 66] | 65 [59.3, 74] |
| Male, | 2 (29) | 2 (29) | 4 (29) |
| APOE ε4, | 4 (57) | 5 (71) | 9 (64) |
| MMSE score | |||
| Baseline | 29 [28, 29.5] | 23 [23, 24.5]b | 25.5 [23.3, 28.8] |
| Follow-up, median [IQR] | 25 [24, 27]c | 20 [17, 23.8] | 24 [18.5, 25]c |
| [11C]PIB (composite SUVR) | 1.72 [1.68, 1.87] | 1.74 [1.68, 1.88] | 1.73 [1.67, 1.88] |
| Aβ1–42 (pg/mL) | 236.1 [217, 453] | 202.2 [162.4, 310.3] | 218 [193, 379] |
| P-tau181p (pg/mL) | 68 [47, 76] | 58 [54, 98] | 63 [47, 87] |
| T-tau (pg/mL) | 538 [346, 683] | 529.1 [455, 815] | 534 [372, 755] |
| Tau N-Mid (pg/mL) | 213 [118, 294] | 275 [135, 420] | 240 [135, 355] |
| Tau-368 (pg/mL) | 12.3 [11, 14.2] | 9.57 [8.4, 14.8] | 12.1 [9.4, 14.5] |
| Tau-368/T-tau | 0.026 [0.02, 0.032] | 0.019 [0.018,0.022]b | 0.018 [0.023, 0.026] |
| Tau-368/tau N-Mid | 0.06 [0.053, 0.083] | 0.041 [0.035, 0.071] | 0.055 [0.040, 0.071] |
Data are presented as median [quartile 1, quartile 3] unless otherwise specified
aTwo patients had progressed to AD dementia at clinical follow-up
bSignificantly lower, relative to prodromal AD (p < 0.01)
cSignificantly lower, relative to baseline (p < 0.01)
Fig. 1Relationship between [18F]THK5317 DVR and tau-368 levels (a) and between [18F]FDG SUVR and tau N-Mid levels (b) at baseline. FDG SUVR >1.4 and <1.4 indicate the multilinear regression fits for the significant interactions observed (i.e. a positive fit in those with an isocortical composite SUVR >1.4, and a negative fit in those with an isocortical composite SUVR <1.4). The chord diagram (c) shows the multilinear regression model findings, with each band indicating a significant relationship between CSF and PET measures. MTL medial temporal, LTL lateral temporal, FRT frontal, PAR parietal, PCC posterior cingulate, OCC occipital, CTX isocortical composite, LIMB Braak III/IV, ISOC Braak V/VI
Fig. 2Relationships between the annual rate of change in [18F]THK5317 DVR and tau-368/T-tau ratio and tau N-Mid level (a) and between the annual rate of change in [18F]FDG SUVR and tau-368/T-tau ratio (b). The chord diagram (c) shows the multilinear regression model findings, with each band indicating a significant association. MTL medial temporal, LTL lateral temporal, FRT frontal, PAR parietal, PCC posterior cingulate, OCC occipital, CTX isocortical composite, LIMB Braak III/IV, ISOC Braak V/VI
Fig. 3Concordance between binarized [18F]THK5317 uptake and CSF tau levels: INNOTEST tau (a), tau N-Mid and tau-368/T-tau (b). MTL medial temporal, LTL lateral temporal, FRT frontal, PAR parietal, PCC posterior cingulate, OCC occipital, CTX isocortical composite, LIMB Braak III/IV, ISOC Braak V/VI
Fig. 4Imaging and CSF profiles in patients with a baseline diagnosis of prodromal AD (a, c), and AD dementia (b, c). Given the widespread use of P-tau181p and T-tau in the clinical work-up of patients with dementia disorder, these measures were selected to define concordance (a, b). [18F]THK5317 positivity was considered present when a high percentage of ROIs showed DVR values above the defined cut-off values for THK-controls