| Literature DB >> 27683159 |
Laure Saint-Aubert1, Ove Almkvist1,2,3, Konstantinos Chiotis1, Rita Almeida4, Anders Wall5,6, Agneta Nordberg7,8.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The recent development of tau-specific positron emission tomography (PET) tracers has allowed in vivo quantification of regional tau deposition and offers the opportunity to monitor the progression of tau pathology along with cognitive impairment. In this study, we investigated the relationships of cerebral tau deposition ([18F]THK5317-PET) and metabolism ([18F]FDG-PET) with concomitant cognitive function in patients with probable Alzheimer's disease (AD).Entities:
Keywords: Cognition; Memory; Metabolism; Positron emission tomography (PET); Tau imaging
Year: 2016 PMID: 27683159 PMCID: PMC5041516 DOI: 10.1186/s13195-016-0204-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Alzheimers Res Ther Impact factor: 6.982
Summary of group demographics and neuropsychological assessment of cognitive domains
| MCI PiB-positive (prodromal AD) | AD dementia | |
|---|---|---|
| Number | 11 | 9 |
| Demographics | ||
| Age at testing (years) | 69.7 ± 6.7 | 67.3 ± 7.1 |
| Education | 12.5 ± 3.3 | 13.3 ± 2.7 |
| Gender (M/F) | 5/6 | 2/7 |
| ApoE ε3ε3/ε3ε4/ε4ε4 | 4/1/5 | 1/5/3 |
| Cognitive functions | ||
| Global cognition | ||
| MMSE | 27.7 ± 3.0 | 22.6 ± 3.3** |
| FSIQ | 92.6 ± 12.2 | 69.2 ± 21.6* |
| (z-scores) | −0.8 ± 0.9 | −2.6 ± 1.6 |
| Episodic memory | ||
| RAVL, learning | 34.7 ± 10.0 | 20.9 ± 5.7** |
| (z-scores) | −1.2 ± 1.0 | −2.5 ± 0.5 |
| RAVL, delayed recall | 3.8 ± 3.0 | 1.7 ± 2.2 |
| (z-scores) | −1.8 ± 0.9 | −2.4 ± 0.6 |
| Rey, delayed recall | 12.8 ± 8.1 | 1.2 ± 1.9** |
| (z-scores) | −1.0 ± 1.2 | −2.7 ± 0.3 |
Performance is expressed as mean ± standard deviation to the mean. Z-scores were calculated in comparison to a normative population
Statistically significant differences between groups are displayed as *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01
AD Alzheimer’s disease, ApoE apolipoprotein E, F female, FSIQ full-scale intelligence quotient, M male, MCI mild cognitive impairment, MMSE mini mental state examination, PiB Pittsburgh Compound B, RAVL Rey auditory verbal learning test, Rey Rey-Osterrieth complex figure test
Fig. 1Significant associations between regional [18F]THK5317 retention (DVR) and cognition in AD patients, after adjusting for delay. Prodromal AD patients are displayed in red and AD dementia patients in blue. The graphs also show the p and t values and the standardized β coefficient associated with regional [18F]THK5317 retention in each model. FSIQ full-scale intelligence quotient, MCI mild cognitive impairment, MMSE mini mental state examination, RAVL Rey auditory verbal learning test
Fig. 2Cortical regions of interest where PET tracer retention was significantly associated with cognition in AD patients, after adjusting for delay (not corrected for multiple comparisons). Linear models assessed the association between cognitive performance using five different tests (each row) and (a). [18F]THK5317 retention (DVR) or (b). [18F]FDG uptake (SUVR). Regions are defined according to the Harvard-Oxford atlas. T-values for significant negative associations are displayed with a blue color scale and T-values for significant positive associations are displayed with a red color scale. FSIQ full-scale intelligence quotient, MMSE mini mental state examination, RAVL Rey auditory verbal learning test, Rey Rey-Osterrieth complex figure test
Akaike information criterion indices for significant linear regression models
| FSIQ | MMSE | RAVL, learning | RAVL, delayed recall | Rey, delayed recall | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Regional retention | Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 1 | Model 2 |
| [18F]THK5317 | ||||||||||
| Amygdala | 184 | 183 | 119 | 119 | 151 | 149 | 101 | 93* | 142 | 138* |
| Parahippocampal gyrus (post.) | 173 | 170* | 114 | 114 | 152 | 154 | 103 | 103 | 138 | 134* |
| Parahippocampal gyrus (ant.) | 181 | 178* | 116 | 115 | 147 | 145 | 102 | 98* | 140 | 133* |
| Angular gyrus | 178 | 177 | 118 | 120 | 153 | 155 | 105 | 105 | 137 | 133* |
Model 1: Cognition = [18F]THK5317 regional retention + delay + intercept; Model 2: Cognition = [18F]THK5317 regional retention + delay + age + intercept. Only associations with significant differences (*) between models (using ANOVA) are displayed
Ant anterior part, FSIQ full-scale intelligence quotient, MMSE mini mental state examination, post posterior part, RAVL Rey auditory verbal learning test, Rey Rey-Osterrieth complex figure test
Fig. 3Causal mediation analyses. The model, presented in (a), assessed the effect of [18F]FDG regional uptake (mediator) on the relationship between [18F]THK5317 retention (independent variable) in the same region and cognitive performance (dependent variable). (b) Results for the four associations tested. Significant results are displayed in bold. ACME average causal mediation effect, ADE average direct effect, FSIQ full-scale intelligence quotient, PET positron emission tomography, RAVL Rey auditory verbal learning test