Literature DB >> 30610191

DeepSqueak: a deep learning-based system for detection and analysis of ultrasonic vocalizations.

Kevin R Coffey1, Russell G Marx1, John F Neumaier2.   

Abstract

Rodents engage in social communication through a rich repertoire of ultrasonic vocalizations (USVs). Recording and analysis of USVs has broad utility during diverse behavioral tests and can be performed noninvasively in almost any rodent behavioral model to provide rich insights into the emotional state and motor function of the test animal. Despite strong evidence that USVs serve an array of communicative functions, technical and financial limitations have been barriers for most laboratories to adopt vocalization analysis. Recently, deep learning has revolutionized the field of machine hearing and vision, by allowing computers to perform human-like activities including seeing, listening, and speaking. Such systems are constructed from biomimetic, "deep", artificial neural networks. Here, we present DeepSqueak, a USV detection and analysis software suite that can perform human quality USV detection and classification automatically, rapidly, and reliably using cutting-edge regional convolutional neural network architecture (Faster-RCNN). DeepSqueak was engineered to allow non-experts easy entry into USV detection and analysis yet is flexible and adaptable with a graphical user interface and offers access to numerous input and analysis features. Compared to other modern programs and manual analysis, DeepSqueak was able to reduce false positives, increase detection recall, dramatically reduce analysis time, optimize automatic syllable classification, and perform automatic syntax analysis on arbitrarily large numbers of syllables, all while maintaining manual selection review and supervised classification. DeepSqueak allows USV recording and analysis to be added easily to existing rodent behavioral procedures, hopefully revealing a wide range of innate responses to provide another dimension of insights into behavior when combined with conventional outcome measures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30610191      PMCID: PMC6461910          DOI: 10.1038/s41386-018-0303-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology        ISSN: 0893-133X            Impact factor:   7.853


  33 in total

1.  Ultrasonic vocalizations as indices of affective states in rats.

Authors:  Brian Knutson; Jeffrey Burgdorf; Jaak Panksepp
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 17.737

2.  Acoustic variability and distinguishability among mouse ultrasound vocalizations.

Authors:  Robert C Liu; Kenneth D Miller; Michael M Merzenich; Christoph E Schreiner
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 3.  Types and functions of ultrasonic vocalizations in laboratory rats and mice.

Authors:  Christine V Portfors
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 1.232

4.  Identification of multiple call categories within the rich repertoire of adult rat 50-kHz ultrasonic vocalizations: effects of amphetamine and social context.

Authors:  Jennifer M Wright; Jim C Gourdon; Paul B S Clarke
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2010-05-06       Impact factor: 4.530

5.  22-kHz ultrasonic vocalization in rats as an index of anxiety but not fear: behavioral and pharmacological modulation of affective state.

Authors:  Piotr Jelen; Stefan Soltysik; Jolanta Zagrodzka
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2003-04-17       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Rat ultrasonic vocalization in aversively motivated situations and the role of individual differences in anxiety-related behavior.

Authors:  A Borta; M Wöhr; R K W Schwarting
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2005-10-04       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Unusual repertoire of vocalizations in adult BTBR T+tf/J mice during three types of social encounters.

Authors:  M L Scattoni; L Ricceri; J N Crawley
Journal:  Genes Brain Behav       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.449

8.  Automated categorization of bioacoustic signals: avoiding perceptual pitfalls.

Authors:  Volker B Deecke; Vincent M Janik
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 9.  Frequency-modulated 50 kHz ultrasonic vocalizations: a tool for uncovering the molecular substrates of positive affect.

Authors:  Jeffrey Burgdorf; Jaak Panksepp; Joseph R Moskal
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2010-12-07       Impact factor: 8.989

10.  Affiliative behavior, ultrasonic communication and social reward are influenced by genetic variation in adolescent mice.

Authors:  Jules B Panksepp; Kimberly A Jochman; Joseph U Kim; Jamie J Koy; Ellie D Wilson; Qiliang Chen; Clarinda R Wilson; Garet P Lahvis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2007-04-04       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  46 in total

Review 1.  Computational Neuroethology: A Call to Action.

Authors:  Sandeep Robert Datta; David J Anderson; Kristin Branson; Pietro Perona; Andrew Leifer
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2019-10-09       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 2.  Cocaine abuse and midbrain circuits: Functional anatomy of hypocretin/orexin transmission and therapeutic prospect.

Authors:  Steven J Simmons; Taylor A Gentile
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2019-02-20       Impact factor: 3.252

3.  Effects of Vocal Training on Thyroarytenoid Muscle Neuromuscular Junctions and Myofibers in Young and Older Rats.

Authors:  Adrianna C Shembel; Charles Lenell; Sophia Chen; Aaron M Johnson
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2021-01-18       Impact factor: 6.053

4.  Finding, visualizing, and quantifying latent structure across diverse animal vocal repertoires.

Authors:  Tim Sainburg; Marvin Thielk; Timothy Q Gentner
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 4.475

5.  A comparison of the Avisoft (v.5.2) and MATLAB Mouse Song Analyzer (v.1.3) vocalization analysis systems in C57BL/6, Fmr1-FVB.129, NS-Pten-FVB, and 129 mice.

Authors:  Matthew Binder; Suzanne O Nolan; Joaquin N Lugo
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2020-08-14       Impact factor: 2.390

Review 6.  Harnessing behavioral diversity to understand neural computations for cognition.

Authors:  Simon Musall; Anne E Urai; David Sussillo; Anne K Churchland
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2019-10-25       Impact factor: 6.627

7.  Analysis of ultrasonic vocalizations from mice using computer vision and machine learning.

Authors:  Antonio Ho Fonseca; Gustavo M Santana; Gabriela M Bosque Ortiz; Sérgio Bampi; Marcelo O Dietrich
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 8.140

8.  Low-dimensional learned feature spaces quantify individual and group differences in vocal repertoires.

Authors:  Jack Goffinet; Samuel Brudner; Richard Mooney; John Pearson
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 8.140

Review 9.  Ultrasonic vocalizations in mice: relevance for ethologic and neurodevelopmental disorders studies.

Authors:  Marika Premoli; Maurizio Memo; Sara Anna Bonini
Journal:  Neural Regen Res       Date:  2021-06       Impact factor: 5.135

10.  Dopaminergic signaling supports auditory social learning.

Authors:  Nihaad Paraouty; Catherine R Rizzuto; Dan H Sanes
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.