Literature DB >> 33988503

Low-dimensional learned feature spaces quantify individual and group differences in vocal repertoires.

Jack Goffinet1,2,3, Samuel Brudner3, Richard Mooney3, John Pearson2,3,4,5.   

Abstract

Increases in the scale and complexity of behavioral data pose an increasing challenge for data analysis. A common strategy involves replacing entire behaviors with small numbers of handpicked, domain-specific features, but this approach suffers from several crucial limitations. For example, handpicked features may miss important dimensions of variability, and correlations among them complicate statistical testing. Here, by contrast, we apply the variational autoencoder (VAE), an unsupervised learning method, to learn features directly from data and quantify the vocal behavior of two model species: the laboratory mouse and the zebra finch. The VAE converges on a parsimonious representation that outperforms handpicked features on a variety of common analysis tasks, enables the measurement of moment-by-moment vocal variability on the timescale of tens of milliseconds in the zebra finch, provides strong evidence that mouse ultrasonic vocalizations do not cluster as is commonly believed, and captures the similarity of tutor and pupil birdsong with qualitatively higher fidelity than previous approaches. In all, we demonstrate the utility of modern unsupervised learning approaches to the quantification of complex and high-dimensional vocal behavior.
© 2021, Goffinet et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  autoencoder; computational biology; mouse; neuroscience; statistics; systems biology; zebra finch

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33988503      PMCID: PMC8213406          DOI: 10.7554/eLife.67855

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Elife        ISSN: 2050-084X            Impact factor:   8.140


  29 in total

1.  A cluster separation measure.

Authors:  D L Davies; D W Bouldin
Journal:  IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell       Date:  1979-02       Impact factor: 6.226

2.  DeepSqueak: a deep learning-based system for detection and analysis of ultrasonic vocalizations.

Authors:  Kevin R Coffey; Russell G Marx; John F Neumaier
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2019-01-04       Impact factor: 7.853

3.  The structure of innate vocalizations in Foxp2-deficient mouse pups.

Authors:  S Gaub; M Groszer; S E Fisher; G Ehret
Journal:  Genes Brain Behav       Date:  2010-01-30       Impact factor: 3.449

4.  Finding, visualizing, and quantifying latent structure across diverse animal vocal repertoires.

Authors:  Tim Sainburg; Marvin Thielk; Timothy Q Gentner
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 4.475

5.  Vocalizations of the black-tailed prairie dog, Cynomys ludovicianus.

Authors:  W J Smith; S L Smith; E C Oppenheimer; J G Devilla
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1977-02       Impact factor: 2.844

6.  Low-dimensional learned feature spaces quantify individual and group differences in vocal repertoires.

Authors:  Jack Goffinet; Samuel Brudner; Richard Mooney; John Pearson
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 8.140

7.  Classifying sex and strain from mouse ultrasonic vocalizations using deep learning.

Authors:  A Ivanenko; P Watkins; M A J van Gerven; K Hammerschmidt; B Englitz
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2020-06-22       Impact factor: 4.475

8.  Parallels in the sequential organization of birdsong and human speech.

Authors:  Tim Sainburg; Brad Theilman; Marvin Thielk; Timothy Q Gentner
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-08-12       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  Nearest neighbours reveal fast and slow components of motor learning.

Authors:  Sepp Kollmorgen; Richard H R Hahnloser; Valerio Mante
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  De novo establishment of wild-type song culture in the zebra finch.

Authors:  Olga Fehér; Haibin Wang; Sigal Saar; Partha P Mitra; Ofer Tchernichovski
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-05-03       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  9 in total

1.  Neural dynamics underlying birdsong practice and performance.

Authors:  Jonnathan Singh Alvarado; Jack Goffinet; Valerie Michael; William Liberti; Jordan Hatfield; Timothy Gardner; John Pearson; Richard Mooney
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2021-10-20       Impact factor: 69.504

2.  Capturing the songs of mice with an improved detection and classification method for ultrasonic vocalizations (BootSnap).

Authors:  Reyhaneh Abbasi; Peter Balazs; Maria Adelaide Marconi; Doris Nicolakis; Sarah M Zala; Dustin J Penn
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2022-05-12       Impact factor: 4.779

Review 3.  Toward a Computational Neuroethology of Vocal Communication: From Bioacoustics to Neurophysiology, Emerging Tools and Future Directions.

Authors:  Tim Sainburg; Timothy Q Gentner
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2021-12-20       Impact factor: 3.558

4.  Low-dimensional learned feature spaces quantify individual and group differences in vocal repertoires.

Authors:  Jack Goffinet; Samuel Brudner; Richard Mooney; John Pearson
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 8.140

5.  Automated annotation of birdsong with a neural network that segments spectrograms.

Authors:  Yarden Cohen; David Aaron Nicholson; Alexa Sanchioni; Emily K Mallaber; Viktoriya Skidanova; Timothy J Gardner
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 8.713

6.  Identification, Analysis and Characterization of Base Units of Bird Vocal Communication: The White Spectacled Bulbul (Pycnonotus xanthopygos) as a Case Study.

Authors:  Aya Marck; Yoni Vortman; Oren Kolodny; Yizhar Lavner
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2022-02-14       Impact factor: 3.558

7.  Dopamine neurons evaluate natural fluctuations in performance quality.

Authors:  Alison Duffy; Kenneth W Latimer; Jesse H Goldberg; Adrienne L Fairhall; Vikram Gadagkar
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2022-03-29       Impact factor: 9.423

8.  Advanced paternal age diversifies individual trajectories of vocalization patterns in neonatal mice.

Authors:  Lingling Mai; Hitoshi Inada; Ryuichi Kimura; Kouta Kanno; Takeru Matsuda; Ryosuke O Tachibana; Valter Tucci; Fumiyasu Komaki; Noboru Hiroi; Noriko Osumi
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2022-08-11

9.  Acoustic camera system for measuring ultrasound communication in mice.

Authors:  Jumpei Matsumoto; Kouta Kanno; Masahiro Kato; Hiroshi Nishimaru; Tsuyoshi Setogawa; Choijiljav Chinzorig; Tomohiro Shibata; Hisao Nishijo
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2022-07-21
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.