Literature DB >> 14714820

Acoustic variability and distinguishability among mouse ultrasound vocalizations.

Robert C Liu1, Kenneth D Miller, Michael M Merzenich, Christoph E Schreiner.   

Abstract

Auditory neurobiology has benefited significantly from ethological approaches using acoustic communication signals. Developing an ethological model in a genetically manipulable system such as the mouse would enhance the ability to investigate the processing, learning, and recognition of sounds. Characterizing the basic acoustic structure of mouse vocalizations would help lay a foundation for such a future study. Towards this goal, ultrasound vocalizations emitted by isolated mouse pups and pairs of adult males and females have been digitally recorded and examined. Previous work suggests that these calls may have communicative significance. An analysis of the natural variability in their spectral content, median frequency, duration, and repetition period reveals acoustic structure that could be used for recognizing the calls. Other parameters, like the rate of frequency modulation, may also be informative, but have not been examined. Pup isolation calls develop systematically between postnatal day 5 and 12 towards a more stereotyped vocalization--contracting from a wide range of values into narrower clusters of frequency and duration, and shifting from longer to shorter repetition periods. Most significantly, pup isolation and adult encounter calls fall into two distinct spectral and temporal categories, making it possible for a receiver to acoustically distinguish between them, and to potentially categorically perceive them along those dimensions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14714820     DOI: 10.1121/1.1623787

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  75 in total

1.  Subset of thin spike cortical neurons preserve the peripheral encoding of stimulus onsets.

Authors:  Frank G Lin; Robert C Liu
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-10-13       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Understanding the neurophysiological basis of auditory abilities for social communication: a perspective on the value of ethological paradigms.

Authors:  Sharath Bennur; Joji Tsunada; Yale E Cohen; Robert C Liu
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2013-08-27       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 3.  Perceptual learning in the developing auditory cortex.

Authors:  Shaowen Bao
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.386

4.  Primate communication in the pure ultrasound.

Authors:  Marissa A Ramsier; Andrew J Cunningham; Gillian L Moritz; James J Finneran; Cathy V Williams; Perry S Ong; Sharon L Gursky-Doyen; Nathaniel J Dominy
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2012-02-08       Impact factor: 3.703

5.  An auditory colliculothalamocortical brain slice preparation in mouse.

Authors:  Daniel A Llano; Bernard J Slater; Alexandria M H Lesicko; Kevin A Stebbings
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-10-09       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  The role of ultrasonic vocalizations in mouse communication.

Authors:  Christine V Portfors; David J Perkel
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2014-07-23       Impact factor: 6.627

Review 7.  Duration tuning in the auditory midbrain of echolocating and non-echolocating vertebrates.

Authors:  Riziq Sayegh; Brandon Aubie; Paul A Faure
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2011-02-09       Impact factor: 1.836

8.  Activation of serotonin 3 receptors changes in vivo auditory responses in the mouse inferior colliculus.

Authors:  Alexander Bohorquez; Laura M Hurley
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2009-02-21       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Perceptual and neuronal boundary learned from higher-order stimulus probabilities.

Authors:  Hania Köver; Kirt Gill; Yi-Ting L Tseng; Shaowen Bao
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Engineered deafness reveals that mouse courtship vocalizations do not require auditory experience.

Authors:  Elena J Mahrt; David J Perkel; Ling Tong; Edwin W Rubel; Christine V Portfors
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.