Literature DB >> 30603646

The comparison of teaching efficiency between massive open online courses and traditional courses in medicine education: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Fei Zhao1, You Fu2, Qi-Jie Zhang3, Yue Zhou1, Peng-Fei Ge1, Hua-Xing Huang4, Yuan He4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to investigate and compare the passing rates of Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) with Traditional Courses to indicate how to improve the teaching efficiency in Medicine Education.
METHODS: A systematic search of relevant published literature was conducted to collect relevant retrospective cohort studies that compared the teaching efficiency of MOOCs and Traditional Courses.
RESULTS: There are three retrospective cohort studies included in the final meta-analysis. There were no significant differences in the passing rates of MOOCs and Traditional Courses.
CONCLUSIONS: it is necessary for universities to invest in online education to promote the development of MOOCs, which will probably have an advantage over Traditional Courses for postgraduate medical education in the near future.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Massive Open Online Course (MOOC); Medicine Education; Traditional Course; meta-analysis

Year:  2018        PMID: 30603646      PMCID: PMC6312816          DOI: 10.21037/atm.2018.11.32

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Transl Med        ISSN: 2305-5839


  17 in total

1.  Online education: MOOCs taken by educated few.

Authors:  Ezekiel J Emanuel
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-11-21       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.

Authors:  David Moher; Alessandro Liberati; Jennifer Tetzlaff; Douglas G Altman
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2009-07-23       Impact factor: 6.437

3.  Perceptions of a mobile technology on learning strategies in the anatomy laboratory.

Authors:  Chandler H Mayfield; Peter T Ohara; Patricia S O'Sullivan
Journal:  Anat Sci Educ       Date:  2012-08-24       Impact factor: 5.958

4.  Are MOOCs the future of medical education?

Authors:  Ben Harder
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2013-04-26

5.  MOOCs 101: an introduction to massive open online courses.

Authors:  Matthew B Hoy
Journal:  Med Ref Serv Q       Date:  2014

Review 6.  Computer-based teaching module design: principles derived from learning theories.

Authors:  K H Vincent Lau
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 6.251

7.  Massive open online courses are relevant for postgraduate medical training.

Authors:  Yousif Subhi; Kristoffer Andresen; Signe Rolskov Bojsen; Philip Mørkeberg Nilsson; Lars Konge
Journal:  Dan Med J       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 1.240

Review 8.  Implications of a new form of online education.

Authors:  Denis Parkinson
Journal:  Nurs Times       Date:  2014 Mar 26-Apr 1

Review 9.  Massive open online courses on health and medicine: review.

Authors:  Tharindu Rekha Liyanagunawardena; Shirley Ann Williams
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2014-08-14       Impact factor: 5.428

10.  Perception and use of massive open online courses among medical students in a developing country: multicentre cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Omar A Aboshady; Ahmed E Radwan; Asmaa R Eltaweel; Ahmed Azzam; Amr A Aboelnaga; Heba A Hashem; Salma Y Darwish; Rehab Salah; Omar N Kotb; Ahmed M Afifi; Aya M Noaman; Dalal S Salem; Ahmed Hassouna
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-01-05       Impact factor: 2.692

View more
  3 in total

1.  Asynchronous online lecture may not be an effective method in teaching cardiovascular physiology during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Weerapat Kositanurit; Sarocha Vivatvakin; Kasiphak Kaikaew; Pachara Varachotisate; Chuti Burana; Maneerat Chayanupatkul; Sekh Thanprasertsuk; Danai Wangsaturaka; Onanong Kulaputana
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 2.463

Review 2.  Effects of Online Learning on College Students in Eastern China: A Structural Equation Model.

Authors:  Junqi Zhu; Haixia Zhao; Xue Wang; Li Yang; Zhiyuan Qin; Jichao Geng
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-03-17

3.  These may not be the courses you are seeking: a systematic review of open online courses in health professions education.

Authors:  Michael Rowe; Christian R Osadnik; Shane Pritchard; Stephen Maloney
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2019-09-14       Impact factor: 2.463

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.