| Literature DB >> 30578205 |
Hee Jun Kim1, Sun Mi Kim2, Heechul Shin3, Joung-Soon Jang1, Young In Kim2, Doug Hyun Han2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The application of game-based learning in clinical practice has shown potential advantages in previous studies. However, there have been little efforts to use smartphone-based mobile games in the management of adult patients with cancer.Entities:
Keywords: breast cancer; chemotherapy; mobile phone; quality of life; side effects
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30578205 PMCID: PMC6305659 DOI: 10.2196/jmir.9559
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Med Internet Res ISSN: 1438-8871 Impact factor: 5.428
Figure 1Representative screenshots of the ILOVEBREAST game. Source and copyright: Industry Academic Cooperation Foundation, Chung-Ang University Hospital.
Figure 2CONSORT study flow diagram.
Demographic data.
| Characteristics | Game group (n=36) | Control group (n=40) | ||
| Age (years), median | 49.8 | 52.1 | .24 | |
| Years of education, mean (SD) | 13.5 (2.0) | 13.2 (1.9) | .51 | |
| .94 | ||||
| Highest tertile | 2 (6) | 2 (5) | ||
| Middle tertile | 32 (89) | 35 (88) | ||
| Lowest tertile | 2 (6) | 3 (8) | ||
| Current smoker, n (%) | 5 (14) | 4 (10) | .43 | |
| Social drinking, n (%) | 17 (47) | 19 (48) | .49 | |
| History of mobile gaming, n (%) | 20 (56) | 22 (55.0) | .50 | |
| .94 | ||||
| ECOGb 0-1 | 35 (97) | 39 (98) | ||
| ECOG 2 | 1 (3) | 1 (2.5) | ||
| ECOG 3-4 | 0 (0) | 0 (0.0) | ||
| .99 | ||||
| Invasive ductal carcinoma | 35 (97) | 38 (95) | ||
| Others | 1 (3) | 2 (5) | ||
| .79 | ||||
| Initial stage IV | 8 (22) | 10 (25) | ||
| Relapsed stage IV | 26 (72) | 30 (75) | ||
| .77 | ||||
| Positive | 25 (69) | 29 (73) | ||
| Negative | 11 (31) | 11 (28) | ||
| .07 | ||||
| Positive | 13 (36) | 7 (18) | ||
| Negative | 23 (64) | 33 (83) | ||
| .84 | ||||
| Nontriple negative | 30 (83) | 34 (85) | ||
| Triple negative | 6 (17) | 6 (15) | ||
aEconomic status was classified into the following tertiles: highest, > US $100,000; middle, $30000-$100,000; and lowest, <$30000.
bECOG: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group.
Figure 3Levels of satisfaction in ILOVEBREAST.
Comparison of physically adverse events between study groups.
| Education time and medication compliance | Game group (n=34) | Control group (n=38) | ||
| Time spent for game playing or self-education (minutes/day), mean (SD) | 22.2 (6.1) | 5.5 (4.0) | <.001 | |
| Korean Medication Adherence Rating Scale, mean (SD) | 7.6 (0.7) | 6.5 (0.5) | <.001 | |
| Nausea | 29 (85) | 23 (61) | .02 | |
| Fatigue | 16 (47) | 29 (76) | .02 | |
| Decreased appetite | 16 (47) | 11 (29) | .18 | |
| Numbness of hand/foot | 0 (0) | 22 (58) | .02 | |
| Stomatitis | 0 (0) | 4 (11) | .15 | |
| Gastrointestinal (diarrhea or constipation) | 7 (21) | 9 (24) | .97 | |
| Hair loss | 0 (0) | 10 (26) | .27 | |
| Skin rash | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | N/Aa | |
| Nausea | 5 (15) | 0 (0) | .02 | |
| Fatigue | 1 (3) | 12 (32) | .002 | |
| Decreased appetite | 3 (9) | 6 (16) | .59 | |
| Numbness of hand and foot | 0 (0) | 3 (8) | .28 | |
| Stomatitis | 0 (0) | 3 (8) | .28 | |
| Gastrointestinal (diarrhea or constipation) | 1 (3) | 5 (13) | .25 | |
| Hair loss | 0 (0) | 8 (21) | .01 | |
| Skin rash | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | N/A | |
aN/A: not applicable.
Comparison of psychological side effects between study groups.
| Psychological side effects | Baseline | At 3 weeks | Differences | ||||||
| Game, | Control, | Game, | Control, | Game, | Control, | ||||
| Quality of life | 77.5 (3.4) | 76.8 (4.5) | .48 | 74.9 (3.5) | 72.2 (5.3) | .01 | −2.6 (1.5) | −4.6 (4.4) | .01 |
| Overall quality | 2.3 (0.7) | 2.3 (0.6) | .74 | 2.5 (0.7) | 2.5 (0.6) | .85 | −0.3 (0.3) | 0.4 (0.2) | .65 |
| Overall health | 1.9 (0.5) | 1.7 (0.6) | .14 | 2.1(0.7) | 2.3 (0.6) | .47 | 0.3 (0.6) | 0.6 (0.9) | .08 |
| Physical health | 19.1 (2.2) | 18.7 (1.8) | .37 | 20.4 (2.2) | 21.1 (1.7) | .16 | 1.3 (1.0) | 2.4 (1.9) | .003 |
| Psychological health | 18.1 (1.4) | 17.6 (43.1) | .31 | 18.7 (1.4) | 19.3 (4.3) | .43 | −2.1 (0.7) | 1.7 (2.9) | .02 |
| Social relationships | 9.3 (1.3) | 9.6 (1.6) | .37 | 9.4 (1.2) | 9.9 (1.9) | .22 | 0.1 (0.3) | 0.2 (2.1) | .67 |
| Environment | 23.8 (1.7) | 22.9 (3.5) | .16 | 24.3 (1.9) | 24.3 (3.3) | .90 | 0.4 (1.1) | 1.4 (2.5) | .03 |
| Beck’s depression index | 13.1 (3.5) | 12.4 (5.6) | .51 | 15.7 (3.7) | 14.9 (5.2) | .50 | 2.6 (1.1) | 2.6 (1.7) | .99 |
| State anxiety | 37.4 (3.8) | 37.9 (3.3) | .43 | 40.6 (3.6) | 42.0 (3.8) | .11 | 3.4 (0.9) | 4.1 (3.4) | .21 |
Figure 4Psychological adverse events: (A) quality of life, (B) Beck’s depression index, and (C) state anxiety. *: P<.05.