Literature DB >> 30571088

Structural Analysis of Monoclonal Antibodies by Ultrahigh Resolution MALDI In-Source Decay FT-ICR Mass Spectrometry.

Yuri E M van der Burgt1, David P A Kilgour2, Yury O Tsybin3, Kristina Srzentić4, Luca Fornelli4, Alain Beck5, Manfred Wuhrer1, Simone Nicolardi1.   

Abstract

The emergence of complex protein therapeutics in general and monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) in particular have stimulated analytical chemists to develop new methods and strategies for their structural characterization. Mass spectrometry plays a key role in providing information on the primary amino acid sequence, post-translational modifications, and other structure characteristics that must be monitored during the manufacturing process and subsequent quality control assessment. In this study, we present a novel method that allows structural characterization of mAbs based on MALDI in-source decay (ISD) fragmentation, coupled with Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance (FT-ICR) MS. The method benefits from higher resolution of absorption mode FT mass spectra, compared to magnitude mode, which enables simultaneous identification of ISD fragments from both the heavy and light chains with a higher confidence in a wide mass range up to m/ z 13 500. This method was applied to two standard mAbs, namely NIST mAb and trastuzumab, in preparation for method application in an interlaboratory study on mAbs structural analysis coordinated by the Consortium for Top-Down Proteomics. Extensive sequence coverage was obtained from the middle-down analysis (IdeS- and GingisKHAN-digested mAbs) that complemented the top-down analysis of intact mAbs. In addition, MALDI FT-ICR MS of IdeS-digested mAbs allowed isotopic-level profiling of proteoforms with regard to heavy chain N-glycosylation.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 30571088      PMCID: PMC6365908          DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.8b04515

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anal Chem        ISSN: 0003-2700            Impact factor:   6.986


Structural characterization of protein therapeutics is an essential part of their development and production process.[1−4] Regulatory authorities require in-depth characterization, and detailed quality control, of biopharmaceuticals to demonstrate similarity of the drug substance from different batches, throughout the production process. Moreover, structural analysis provides rationale for optimizing biopharmaceuticals downstream processing and formulation studies. The most important class of clinically approved protein therapeutics are monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) of the immunoglobulin G (IgG) class.[5,6] The IgG molecule has a symmetric Y-shaped structure that is composed of two identical heavy chains (Hc, approximately 50 kDa each) and two identical light chains (Lc, approximately 25 kDa each). The Hc is typically N-glycosylated at one specific asparagine in the fragment crystallizable (Fc) region. Structural complexity in IgGs is increased by additional post-translational modifications (PTMs) such as intra- and interchain cysteinecysteine connections (disulfide bonds), possible polypeptide truncation, and chemical modifications such as asparagine deamidation and methionine oxidation. Consequently, comprehensive structural analysis of mAbs at a proteoform level is a challenging task.[7] Specifically, the read-out of the primary sequence,[8−10] mapping of disulfide bonds,[11,12] and profiling of protein glycosylation[13−16] require various strategies that add up to a time-consuming procedure. These structural characteristics are monitored during the manufacturing process and must meet the criteria defined for the critical quality attributes of each mAb.[17] Current MS-based characterization assays of mAbs utilize primarily standard bottom-up proteomics strategies.[18] Sample preparation in these assays involves a reduction/alkylation step, with an inherent risk of introducing artifacts, for example when quantifying or localizing deamidation or oxidation.[1] Furthermore, it is well-known that a bottom-up workflow can miss detection of partial backbone cleavages or unexpected modifications.[19] Middle- and top-down strategies, in which the mAb is only partially digested or left intact, can largely overcome these issues.[7] Such approaches are mostly carried out on high-resolution electrospray ionization instruments.[20,21] However, matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization (MALDI) in-source decay (ISD) MS is a powerful alternative for primary structure characterizations of both N- and C-terminal parts of proteins, including mAbs.[22,23] In the MALDI-ISD workflows, off-line reduction of disulfide bonds is avoided, and reduction is instead achieved by using 1,5-diaminonaphthalene (1,5-DAN) as a MALDI matrix.[24,25] The hydrogen-donor property of this matrix results in the reduction of the disulfide bonds during the ionization process. In MALDI-ISD spectra, c-type fragment ions are usually the most intense series, while z + 1- (or z + 2), w-, y-, b-, and a-type fragments are less abundant. Most if not all fragment ions obtained from MALDI-ISD are singly charged (protonated) resulting in relatively simple mass spectra. Nonetheless, in case a mixture of proteins or polypeptide subunits is considered, such as for the analysis of an intact mAb (Hc and Lc) or its middle-down products, the complexity of MALDI-ISD spectra increases. Thus, mass measurements at ultrahigh resolution are crucial for unambiguous identification of ISD fragment ions in a wide m/z-range. The most frequently used instruments in MALDI-ISD MS are time-of-flight (TOF) mass analyzers that exhibit a limited resolving power.[10] In a previous study, we have shown that small (singly charged) proteins can be measured at isotopic resolution up to about m/z 17 000 using a 15T MALDI Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance (FT-ICR) MS system and that in-depth structural information on these proteins can be obtained from ultrahigh resolution MALDI-ISD spectra (with a resolving power of 62 000 at m/z 16 950).[26] The sequence information obtained using this method was complementary to the information obtained from other fragmentation techniques. Notably, these previous measurements were performed using mass spectra represented in magnitude mode FT (mFT). The quality of FT-ICR MS data can be further improved if absorption mode FT (aFT) representation is used instead.[27−30] In this study, we improved MALDI FT-ICR MS acquisition methods and complemented these with the absorption-mode FT mass spectral representation.[31] This was applied to analyze intact, and IdeS- and GingisKHAN-digested mAbs (NIST mAb and trastuzumab), without the need of buffer exchange, prior disulfide bond reduction, or chromatographic separation, allowing the analysis of these mAbs by MS within few minutes. The use of ultrahigh resolution MS allowed us to identify ISD fragments in a wide m/z-range, leading to the extensive and reliable structure characterization of mAbs.

Experimental Section

Chemicals

Two different mAbs, namely trastuzumab (HzIgG1kappa, CHO) and NIST mAb standard (HzIgG1kappa, NS0), were provided by the CTDP.[32] Both mAbs were provided in the intact form and in a digested (but not disulfide bond reduced) form, using structure-specific enzymes IdeS or GingisKHAN (Genovis, Lund, Sweden).[33,34] Briefly, intact trastuzumab and NIST mAb standard were diluted from initial concentrations of 21 and 10 mg/mL, respectively, to a final concentration of 2 mg/mL, using MQ water, and stored at −80 °C in 20-μL aliquots (in 500-μL Lobind Eppendorf tubes) until further use. Antibody subunits were generated in the following manner. To induce mAb cleavage below the hinge region, intact mAbs at 1 mg/mL in PBS, pH 6.8, were digested with 1000 units of Fabricator (IdeS), according to the manufacturer’s instructions, at 37 °C for 30 min, under shaking (350 rpm). The reaction was quenched by adding trifluoroacetic acid to a final concentration of ∼0.05% and the samples were stored at −80 °C until further use. To initiate mAb cleavage above the hinge region, intact mAbs at 1 mg/mL in 100 mM Tris, pH 8, were digested with 1000 units of GingisKHAN (Gingipain K), according to the manufacturer’s instructions, at room temperature (RT) for 1 h. The reaction was quenched by adding trifluoroacetic acid to a final concentration of ∼0.05%, and the samples were stored at −80 °C until further use. All samples were aliquoted and shipped on dry ice. 1,5-Diaminonaphthalene (1,5-DAN; handle with care, check material safety data sheet), α-cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid (HCCA), horse myoglobin, and acetonitrile (MS grade) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). A stock solution of myoglobin at 2 mg/mL was prepared in water.

MALDI-Spotting

For ISD MS analysis, each sample (i.e., myoglobin, intact and digested mAbs) was diluted 1- to 10-fold with MQ water and spotted onto a MALDI ground steel target plate (Bruker Daltonics, Bremen, Germany) as follows. First, 1 μL of diluted sample was put on the plate, followed by addition of 1 μL of 1,5-DAN (saturated solution in acetonitrile/water/formic acid, 50%:49.95%:0.05%) using a 10-μL pipet tip (Rainin tips from Mettler-Toledo, Tiel, Netherlands). Gentle mixing of the 2-μL droplet was performed until small crystals were visible by eye; then the mixture was allowed to dry at RT. In addition, 1 μL of diluted IdeS digest was spotted with 1 μL of α-cyano matrix (saturated solution in acetonitrile/water/formic acid, 50%:49.95%:0.05%) in a similar way. A 200 μg/mL solution of myoglobin (1 μL) was spotted with 1 μL of 1,5-DAN (saturated solution in acetonitrile/water/formic acid, 50%:49.95%:0.05%) and used for external calibration of the FT-ICR MS system.

MALDI Mass Spectrometry

All MALDI- and MALDI-ISD FT-ICR MS experiments were performed as previously reported, with some modification of the acquisition methods.[26] Briefly, all MS experiments were performed on a Bruker 15 T solariX XR FT-ICR mass spectrometer equipped with a CombiSource and a ParaCell (Bruker Daltonics, Bremen, Germany). The FT-ICR MS system was controlled by ftmsControl software and equipped with a Smartbeam-II Laser System (Bruker Daltonics) that operated at a frequency of 500 Hz, and each single spectrum was generated from 200 laser shots. Higher trapping potentials (up to 9.5 V) and ParaCell DC biases (up to 9.3 V) were used to improve the mass measurement precision. Three mass spectra were obtained from a single spot, using three acquisition methods for the corresponding m/z-ranges: 1012–5000; 1012–7000 and 2024–30 000. A fourth acquisition method was used in the m/z-range 3495–30 000 for glycoform analysis. For this purpose, a second MALDI-spot was used. The measurement time ranged from 0.98 min for the acquisitions in the m/z-range 1012–5000 to 2.89 min for the acquisitions in the m/z-range 3495–30 000. A detailed description of the FT-ICR MS parameters of the four applied acquisition methods is provided in Supporting Information Table S1. The instrument was externally calibrated using ISD fragments obtained from myoglobin for the four different acquisition methods.

Absorption Mode FT Spectra Representation

To display an FTMS spectrum in the aFT, it is necessary to correct for systematic phase shifts across the frequency range that result from the methods used to induce coherent ion motion in the respective instruments. Various methods have been presented for solving this phase correction problem on the Orbitrap[20,30] and on FT-ICRs.[28,29,31,35] In this study, the FT-ICR MS data files were recorded to include the transient data (fid) file. The aFT mass spectra were generated directly from the transient data files using AutoVectis software suite (Spectroswiss, Lausanne, Switzerland) that incorporates an improved version of the AutoPhaser method[31] using a genetic algorithm[35] to optimize the phase correction function,[36] applies an asymmetric apodization function to minimize baseline deviations in the resulting absorption mode spectrum,[37] and generates synthetic isotopic distributions with aFT peak profiles to aid peak identification.[38] The data were processed by applying a full-bell, but asymmetric apodization function (F = 0.4) to minimize baseline deviations in the resulting aFT spectrum, while allowing balance between the spectral resolution and signal-to-noise ratio across the spectrum.[37] After apodization, the transients were doubly zero-padded before being processed using the default AutoVectis settings. An internal calibration was applied before analysis in Autoseequer tool. Fragment ions were assigned with an error tolerance of 10, 20, and 40 ppm for the spectra acquired with methods 1, 2, and 3, respectively (see Table S1). The tolerance for the quality value for the match between the observed and theoretical isotopic distribution was 0.65 for c- and z + 1-type fragment and 0.60 for a-, b-, y-, and w-type. An internal calibration of the spectra was also applied before spectral interpretation using mMass.[39] The theoretical c-type fragments from the Lc of each mAb were used as internal calibrants of the spectra generated from intact mAbs while the c-type fragments from Fd subunit were used for the internal calibration of the spectra generated from IdeS- and GingisKHAN-digested mAbs.

Theoretical Isotopic Distributions for Figures

The elemental composition of ISD fragments was calculated using an in-house developed tool in Excel, and theoretical isotopic abundance distributions were generated using the online tool enviPat Web 2.2 (http://www.envipat.eawag.ch/index.php),[40] exported in the “comma-separated value” format and compiled in a text file. Plots were generated in Excel and exported in Adobe Illustrator CS6 to make the figures.

N-Glycosylation at the Fc-Part

N-glycosylation of the Fc-part of both NIST mAb and trastuzumab was evaluated. The IdeS-based enzymatic cleavage of NIST mAb and trastuzumab results in two identical Fc/2 parts (approximately 25 kDa each) and one F(ab)2 portion (approximately 100 kDa). We analyzed IdeS digests of both NIST mAb and trastuzumab by MALDI FT-ICR MS using HCCA as MALDI matrix without the use of any additional separation.

Results and Discussion

MALDI-ISD FT-ICR MS of Intact and Digested NIST mAb

Intact and both IdeS- and GingisKHAN-digested mAbs were analyzed by MALDI-ISD FT-ICR MS. Ultrahigh resolution MS analysis (estimated resolving power 660 000 at m/z 400) was performed using three different acquisition methods to maximize both sensitivity and mass measurement precision in the m/z range from 1012 to 13 500 (Figure ). Thus, obtained spectra from the analysis of intact NIST mAb are combined in Figure A. Note that ISD fragments from both light chain (Lc) and heavy chain (Hc) are detected simultaneously. The combined spectra obtained from the analysis of IdeS- and GingisKHAN-digested NIST mAb are depicted in Figures B and C. IdeS is an enzyme that cleaves the Hc of the NIST mAb below the hinge region, between G239 and G240, whereas GingisKHAN cleaves above the hinge region, between K225 and T226.[33,34] The application of 1,5 DAN reduces the disulfide bonds during the MALDI process. Thus, ISD fragment ions were simultaneously generated from intact Lc, Fd, and Fc/2 digestion products. The increased complexity of the IdeS/GingisKHAN-digested mAb samples hampers unambiguous fragment ion assignments especially at higher m/z-values (both in magnitude and absorption mode). Consequently, fragment ions from digested NIST mAb were assigned up to m/z 7000, whereas fragment ions from intact NIST mAb were assigned up to m/z 13 500.
Figure 1

MALDI-ISD FT-ICR MS analysis of (A) intact, (B) GingisKHAN-digested, and (C) IdeS-digested NIST mAb.

MALDI-ISD FT-ICR MS analysis of (A) intact, (B) GingisKHAN-digested, and (C) IdeS-digested NIST mAb.

Magnitude-Mode FT versus Absorption-Mode FT Mass Spectra

Resolving power is a key parameter in MS-based analysis of complex samples. Overlapping peaks can result in ambiguous identifications when mass resolution is not sufficient. FT-ICR MS provides the highest resolving power within the different classes of mass spectrometers and allows for the analysis of extremely complex samples such as petroleum,[41] mixtures of biomolecules,[42] and nanomaterials.[43] However, ultrahigh mass resolution (UHMR) requires longer measurement time (seconds) with inherently reduced sensitivity. Therefore, the measurement time was balanced with ion intensities resulting in a maximum resolving power of 660 000 (magnitude mode FT, estimated at m/z 400, see Table S1) for MALDI-ISD FT-ICR MS measurements. To further improve resolving power the acquired ICR transients were processed to obtain aFT mass spectra. To this end, we used AutoVectis software to perform a phase correction of ICR time-domain data with reduced baseline deviations. The results of such a correction, in terms of improved resolving power and increased identification confidence, are exemplified in Figure . Here, magnitude-mode visualization did not allow the resolution of the isotopic distributions of the fragments c49 of the Lc and of the fragment c51 and z + 148 of the Hc with pyro-glutamate at the N-terminus and a lysine loss at the C-terminus (Figure A). The postacquisition phase correction increased the resolving power and thus resolved the three isotopic distributions (Figure B). Note that the observed and theoretical isotopic distribution of the z + 149 of the Lc did not match, thus this fragment was not identified and not included in the sequence coverage (Figure ). Similarly, the isotopic distribution of the fragment c47 of the Fc/2 fragment and Lc and the fragments c48 and z + 144 of the Hc with pyroglutamate at the N-terminus and a lysine loss at the C-terminus that were not resolved in the mFT mass spectrum (Figure D) could be distinguished after phase correction in the aFT mass spectrum (Figure E).
Figure 2

Expanded views of MALDI-ISD FT-ICR mass spectra of NIST mAb showing the increased resolving power obtained after phase correction of mFT mass spectra.

Figure 3

Sequence coverage obtained from the top-down and middle-down analysis of NIST mAb. Total sequence coverage was 50% and 65% for Hc and Lc, respectively. Next to glycosylation, two additional proteoforms of the Hc were identified, namely a pyro-glutamine modification at the N-terminus and a lysine loss at the C-terminus.

Expanded views of MALDI-ISD FT-ICR mass spectra of NIST mAb showing the increased resolving power obtained after phase correction of mFT mass spectra. Sequence coverage obtained from the top-down and middle-down analysis of NIST mAb. Total sequence coverage was 50% and 65% for Hc and Lc, respectively. Next to glycosylation, two additional proteoforms of the Hc were identified, namely a pyro-glutamine modification at the N-terminus and a lysine loss at the C-terminus.

Identification of ISD Fragment Ions

The identification of ISD fragment ions was performed using AutoVectis. In addition, ISD spectra were visually inspected and matched to theoretical isotopic distributions of fragment ions (Figure S1). As described in the Experimental Section, we used three different acquisition methods to obtain optimal sensitivity in different m/z ranges. The sequence coverages for intact and IdeS-digested NIST mAb were obtained using these methods and AutoVectis (Figures S2 and S3). As an example, the mass measurement errors of all c- and z + 1-type fragment ions identified in the MALDI-ISD FT-ICR MS spectrum of IdeS-digested NIST in the m/z-range 1000–7000 are reported in Figure S4. Most of the fragment ions were identified in both mFT and aFT spectra and only a minor part were identified exclusively in aFT spectra (data not shown). Phase correction led to additional identifications only when isotopic distributions were not resolved in mFT, for example, in the cases depicted in Figure . MALDI-ISD analysis of the same mAb samples has also been performed using TOF MS. It is noted, however, that TOF MS instruments exhibit a lower resolving power, with corresponding limitations, even when Lc and Hc are analyzed separately. Overlapping isotopic distributions can result from fragment ions of different forms of the same chain. For example, the heavy chain c52 fragment ion with N-terminal pyroglutamate and the z + 149 fragment ion from the Hc with a C-terminal lysine-loss have monoisotopic peaks located at m/z 5528.871 and 5529.664, respectively (Figure S5). These fragment ions are baseline-resolved by FT-ICR MS but not by TOF MS.[10] In addition to c-type ions, the most intense fragment in the spectra, and z + 1-type ions, other fragment types were detected and identified. Examples of y-, b-, a-, and w-type fragments are depicted in Figure S6. In addition, we identified these fragment types in the MALDI-ISD FT-ICR MS spectrum generated from the analysis of IdeS-digested NIST mAb in the m/z-range 1000–7000 (Figure S7). Considering the total number of fragment ions identified in this spectrum (see Figures S3 and S7), the percentage of c-, z + 1-, w-, a-, y-, and b-type were 42%, 22%, 12%, 11%, 11%, and 2%, respectively. The identification of different fragment ion types improves the confidence in the structural characterization of mAbs. In fact, less frequent fragment ions can be used either to corroborate the identifications based on c- and z + 1-type ions or to identify amino acids adjacent to prolines. A drawback of additional fragment types is that the signal intensity is distributed over many more fragment ions with a consequent reduction of the signal-to-noise (S/N). In addition, the presence of many fragment types complicates the ISD spectra, making their interpretation more difficult. At last, with a higher number of fragment ions the false discovery rate (FDR) must be evaluated when identifications are not manually confirmed.

Sequence Coverage of NIST mAb

In this study, we have developed a fast characterization method based on ultrahigh resolution MALDI-ISD FT-ICR MS for the analysis of mAbs. This method allowed the direct analysis of mAbs without the need of a buffer exchange or a chromatographic separation of Lc and Hc or Fd′ and Fc/2 digestion products. Using this method, two modifications on Hc of the NIST mAb were identified beyond glycosylation profiling, namely a pyroglutamate at the N-terminus and a lysine-loss at the C-terminus. The frequency of these two modifications was estimated at 100% and 50%, respectively. The analysis of intact NIST mAb resulted in a sequence coverage of 31% and 65% for Hc and Lc, respectively (Figure ). The analysis of both IdeS and GingisKHAN digests increased the sequence coverage for the Hc up to 50%. The total sequence coverage for the complementarity-determining regions (CDRs) was 72% and 96% for Hc and Lc, respectively.

Sequence Coverage of Trastuzumab mAb

MALDI-ISD FT-ICR MS was also used to analyze trastuzumab. As for the NIST mAb, the high resolving power allowed the reliable identification of different types of ISD fragments in a wide mass range. The sequence coverage obtained from the identification of c- and z + 1-type fragment ions is reported in Figure S8. The analysis of the intact trastuzumab led to sequence coverages of 29% and 56% for Hc and Lc, respectively, while the analysis of both IdeS and GingisKHAN digests allowed to increase the sequence coverage for Hc to 49%. The total sequence coverage for the CDRs was 93% and 80% for Hc and Lc, respectively. In a recent report, trastuzumab was analyzed by ETD and HCD fragmentation.[44] Our MALDI FT-ICR MS analysis of trastuzumab provided sequence information that was complementary to the information obtained. Also compared to similar IgG mAbs using other fragmentation techniques MALDI-ISD FT-ICR MS data is complementary.[9,45−47] This is exemplified for adalimumab (middle-down LC-MS/MS using electron-transfer dissociation) in Figure .[9]
Figure 4

Sequence coverage of light chain obtained from the top-down MALDI-ISD FT-ICR MS analysis of trastuzumab compared to previously reported middle-down analysis by LC-MS/MS with electron-transfer dissociation of adalimumab. The two methods resulted in complementary sequence information as exemplified in the areas highlighted in green. The differences in amino acid sequence between trastuzumab and adalimumab are reported in red.

Sequence coverage of light chain obtained from the top-down MALDI-ISD FT-ICR MS analysis of trastuzumab compared to previously reported middle-down analysis by LC-MS/MS with electron-transfer dissociation of adalimumab. The two methods resulted in complementary sequence information as exemplified in the areas highlighted in green. The differences in amino acid sequence between trastuzumab and adalimumab are reported in red. In general, the sequence coverage obtained using mFT or aFT data were similar. In fact, the number of fragment ions identified in mFT spectra ranged from 95% to 100% the number of fragment ions in the corresponding aFT spectra. This is rationalized by the fact that the resolving power in mFT was already sufficient to identify most of the fragment ions. Only a minor part of all identified fragment ions were identified solely in aFT spectra. However, the identification in aFT is more reliable since a higher resolution allows detection of possible overlapping species.

Glycosylation Analysis

The MALDI FT-ICR MS strategies we report here also provide insight into N-glycosylation of the Fc-part of both NIST mAb and trastuzumab. Previously, in-depth glycosylation analysis resulted in the identification of tens of different glycan structures on the Hc of the IgG1 mAb.[48] Most of these proteoforms (glycoforms) were detected as minor components, whereas a few diantennary glycans represented more than 90% of the total glycosylation.[49] The analysis of these major proteoforms has been reported using lower resolution MS in combination with up-front separation.[49,50] The high-resolution mFT spectra of IdeS-digested NIST mAb and trastuzumab are depicted in Figure . The most abundant glycoforms of Fc-parts of both NIST mAb and trastuzumab are observed as doubly charged ions and, for the first time, identified at isotopic resolution. The relative abundance of these glycoforms is in good agreement with previously reported characterization studies of these mAbs.[49,50]
Figure 5

Microheterogeneity of Fc-glycosylation. MALDI FT-ICR MS spectra of IdeS-digested mAbs: (A) NIST mAb and (B) trastuzumab. For NIST mAb at least seven different N-glycans are observed at the Fc-part of Hc (detected as [M + 2H]2+ ions).

Microheterogeneity of Fc-glycosylation. MALDI FT-ICR MS spectra of IdeS-digested mAbs: (A) NIST mAb and (B) trastuzumab. For NIST mAb at least seven different N-glycans are observed at the Fc-part of Hc (detected as [M + 2H]2+ ions).

Conclusions

We have developed a novel strategy based on ultrahigh resolution MALDI-ISD FT-ICR MS to characterize mAbs. This strategy was applied to primary structure and proteoform analysis of two IgG1 mAbs, namely NIST mAb standard and trastuzumab. Complex top- and middle-down MALDI-ISD FT-ICR mass spectra were generated from both intact mAbs and their large, 25–50 kDa, subunits, produced via IdeS- and GingisKHAN-based digestion. It was shown that MALDI-ISD fragment ions were complementary to those observed in electron-transfer dissociation experiments, and thus translated in additional sequence coverage of the mAbs. It is noted that the combination of top-down and middle-down experiments increased total sequence coverage, however IdeS- and GingisKHAN-based digestions are not needed to map the antibody CDRs. Postprocessing of transients (using AutoVectis) was used to generate absorption-mode FT mass spectra with improved resolving power resulting in unambiguous assignments of further resolved fragment ions. It is noted that although sequence coverage hardly increased, the superior quality of aFT spectra led to a more confident characterization of both N- and C-terminal parts of NIST mAb and trastuzumab compared to mFT mass spectra of the same samples. Finally, direct analysis of IdeS digests by MALDI FT-ICR MS provided a snapshot of the most abundant Fc-glycans that agreed with previously reported in-depth microheterogeneity analysis of mAb Fc-glycosylation. We envision integration of this strategy into a multimethod approach designed for the in-depth structural characterization of complex proteins such as mAbs.
  45 in total

Review 1.  Proteomics by FTICR mass spectrometry: top down and bottom up.

Authors:  Bogdan Bogdanov; Richard D Smith
Journal:  Mass Spectrom Rev       Date:  2005 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 10.946

2.  Automated broadband phase correction of Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectra.

Authors:  Feng Xian; Christopher L Hendrickson; Greg T Blakney; Steven C Beu; Alan G Marshall
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2010-10-14       Impact factor: 6.986

3.  Characterization and comparison of disulfide linkages and scrambling patterns in therapeutic monoclonal antibodies: using LC-MS with electron transfer dissociation.

Authors:  Yi Wang; Qiaozhen Lu; Shiaw-Lin Wu; Barry L Karger; William S Hancock
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2011-03-23       Impact factor: 6.986

4.  mMass data miner: an open source alternative for mass spectrometric data analysis.

Authors:  Martin Strohalm; Martin Hassman; Bedrich Kosata; Milan Kodícek
Journal:  Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.419

Review 5.  Applications of mass spectrometry for the structural characterization of recombinant protein pharmaceuticals.

Authors:  Catherine A Srebalus Barnes; Amareth Lim
Journal:  Mass Spectrom Rev       Date:  2007 May-Jun       Impact factor: 10.946

6.  Phase correction of Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectra using MatLab.

Authors:  Yulin Qi; Christopher J Thompson; Steve L Van Orden; Peter B O'Connor
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2011-01-28       Impact factor: 3.109

7.  Cleavage of IgG1 and IgG3 by gingipain K from Porphyromonas gingivalis may compromise host defense in progressive periodontitis.

Authors:  Bjarne Vincents; Arndt Guentsch; Dominika Kostolowska; Ulrich von Pawel-Rammingen; Sigrun Eick; Jan Potempa; Magnus Abrahamson
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2011-07-18       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Rapid sequencing and disulfide mapping of peptides containing disulfide bonds by using 1,5-diaminonaphthalene as a reductive matrix.

Authors:  Yuko Fukuyama; Shinichi Iwamoto; Koichi Tanaka
Journal:  J Mass Spectrom       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 1.982

9.  New method for characterizing highly disulfide-bridged peptides in complex mixtures: application to toxin identification from crude venoms.

Authors:  Loïc Quinton; Kevin Demeure; Rowan Dobson; Nicolas Gilles; Valérie Gabelica; Edwin De Pauw
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2007-06-20       Impact factor: 4.466

10.  Mass spectrometric determination of disulfide linkages in recombinant therapeutic proteins using online LC-MS with electron-transfer dissociation.

Authors:  Shiaw-Lin Wu; Haitao Jiang; Qiaozhen Lu; Shujia Dai; William S Hancock; Barry L Karger
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2009-01-01       Impact factor: 6.986

View more
  16 in total

1.  Fast Afucosylation Profiling of Glycoengineered Antibody Subunits by Middle-Up Mass Spectrometry.

Authors:  Elsa Wagner-Rousset; Olivier Colas; Stéphane Chenu; Yannis-Nicolas François; Davy Guillarme; Sarah Cianferani; Yury O Tsybin; Jonathan Sjögren; Arnaud Delobel; Alain Beck
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2021

2.  Ion Activation Methods for Peptides and Proteins.

Authors:  Luis A Macias; Inês C Santos; Jennifer S Brodbelt
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2019-11-12       Impact factor: 6.986

Review 3.  Applications and advancements of FT-ICR-MS for interactome studies.

Authors:  Juan D Chavez; Sung-Gun Park; Jared P Mohr; James E Bruce
Journal:  Mass Spectrom Rev       Date:  2020-12-08       Impact factor: 10.946

4.  Top or Middle? Up or Down? Toward a Standard Lexicon for Protein Top-Down and Allied Mass Spectrometry Approaches.

Authors:  Frederik Lermyte; Yury O Tsybin; Peter B O'Connor; Joseph A Loo
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2019-05-09       Impact factor: 3.109

5.  Proteoform-Resolved FcɤRIIIa Binding Assay for Fab Glycosylated Monoclonal Antibodies Achieved by Affinity Chromatography Mass Spectrometry of Fc Moieties.

Authors:  Steffen Lippold; Simone Nicolardi; Manfred Wuhrer; David Falck
Journal:  Front Chem       Date:  2019-10-24       Impact factor: 5.221

Review 6.  Monitoring of immunoglobulin N- and O-glycosylation in health and disease.

Authors:  Noortje de Haan; David Falck; Manfred Wuhrer
Journal:  Glycobiology       Date:  2020-03-20       Impact factor: 4.313

7.  Monitoring glycation levels of a bispecific monoclonal antibody at subunit level by ultrahigh-resolution MALDI FT-ICR mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Christoph Gstöttner; Dietmar Reusch; Markus Haberger; Irina Dragan; Peter Van Veelen; David P A Kilgour; Yury O Tsybin; Yuri E M van der Burgt; Manfred Wuhrer; Simone Nicolardi
Journal:  MAbs       Date:  2020 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 5.857

8.  Novel Interface for High-Throughput Analysis of Biotherapeutics by Electrospray Mass Spectrometry.

Authors:  Hae-Min Park; Valerie J Winton; Jared J Drader; Sheri Manalili Wheeler; Greg A Lazar; Neil L Kelleher; Yichin Liu; John C Tran; Philip D Compton
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2020-01-10       Impact factor: 6.986

9.  Interlaboratory Study for Characterizing Monoclonal Antibodies by Top-Down and Middle-Down Mass Spectrometry.

Authors:  Kristina Srzentić; Luca Fornelli; Yury O Tsybin; Joseph A Loo; Henrique Seckler; Jeffrey N Agar; Lissa C Anderson; Dina L Bai; Alain Beck; Jennifer S Brodbelt; Yuri E M van der Burgt; Julia Chamot-Rooke; Sneha Chatterjee; Yunqiu Chen; David J Clarke; Paul O Danis; Jolene K Diedrich; Robert A D'Ippolito; Mathieu Dupré; Natalia Gasilova; Ying Ge; Young Ah Goo; David R Goodlett; Sylvester Greer; Kim F Haselmann; Lidong He; Christopher L Hendrickson; Joshua D Hinkle; Matthew V Holt; Sam Hughes; Donald F Hunt; Neil L Kelleher; Anton N Kozhinov; Ziqing Lin; Christian Malosse; Alan G Marshall; Laure Menin; Robert J Millikin; Konstantin O Nagornov; Simone Nicolardi; Ljiljana Paša-Tolić; Stuart Pengelley; Neil R Quebbemann; Anja Resemann; Wendy Sandoval; Richa Sarin; Nicholas D Schmitt; Jeffrey Shabanowitz; Jared B Shaw; Michael R Shortreed; Lloyd M Smith; Frank Sobott; Detlev Suckau; Timothy Toby; Chad R Weisbrod; Norelle C Wildburger; John R Yates; Sung Hwan Yoon; Nicolas L Young; Mowei Zhou
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2020-08-19       Impact factor: 3.109

10.  Evaluation of Sibling and Twin Fragment Ions Improves the Structural Characterization of Proteins by Top-Down MALDI In-Source Decay Mass Spectrometry.

Authors:  Simone Nicolardi; David P A Kilgour; Natasja Dolezal; Jan W Drijfhout; Manfred Wuhrer; Yuri E M van der Burgt
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2020-04-02       Impact factor: 6.986

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.