| Literature DB >> 32812765 |
Kristina Srzentić1, Luca Fornelli1, Yury O Tsybin2, Joseph A Loo3, Henrique Seckler1, Jeffrey N Agar4, Lissa C Anderson5, Dina L Bai6, Alain Beck7, Jennifer S Brodbelt8, Yuri E M van der Burgt9, Julia Chamot-Rooke10, Sneha Chatterjee11, Yunqiu Chen12, David J Clarke13, Paul O Danis14, Jolene K Diedrich15, Robert A D'Ippolito6, Mathieu Dupré10, Natalia Gasilova16, Ying Ge17, Young Ah Goo18, David R Goodlett18, Sylvester Greer8, Kim F Haselmann19, Lidong He5, Christopher L Hendrickson5, Joshua D Hinkle6, Matthew V Holt20, Sam Hughes13, Donald F Hunt6, Neil L Kelleher1, Anton N Kozhinov2, Ziqing Lin17, Christian Malosse10, Alan G Marshall5,21, Laure Menin16, Robert J Millikin17, Konstantin O Nagornov2, Simone Nicolardi9, Ljiljana Paša-Tolić22, Stuart Pengelley23, Neil R Quebbemann3, Anja Resemann23, Wendy Sandoval24, Richa Sarin12, Nicholas D Schmitt4, Jeffrey Shabanowitz6, Jared B Shaw22, Michael R Shortreed17, Lloyd M Smith17, Frank Sobott11,25, Detlev Suckau23, Timothy Toby1, Chad R Weisbrod5, Norelle C Wildburger26, John R Yates15, Sung Hwan Yoon18, Nicolas L Young20, Mowei Zhou22.
Abstract
The Consortium for Top-Down Proteomics (www.topdownproteomics.org) launched the present study to assess the current state of top-down mass spectrometry (TD MS) and middle-down mass spectrometry (MD MS) for characterizing monoclonal antibody (mAb) primary structures, including their modifications. To meet the needs of the rapidly growing therapeutic antibody market, it is important to develop analytical strategies to characterize the heterogeneity of a therapeutic product's primary structure accurately and reproducibly. The major objective of the present study is to determine whether current TD/MD MS technologies and protocols can add value to the more commonly employed bottom-up (BU) approaches with regard to confirming protein integrity, sequencing variable domains, avoiding artifacts, and revealing modifications and their locations. We also aim to gather information on the common TD/MD MS methods and practices in the field. A panel of three mAbs was selected and centrally provided to 20 laboratories worldwide for the analysis: Sigma mAb standard (SiLuLite), NIST mAb standard, and the therapeutic mAb Herceptin (trastuzumab). Various MS instrument platforms and ion dissociation techniques were employed. The present study confirms that TD/MD MS tools are available in laboratories worldwide and provide complementary information to the BU approach that can be crucial for comprehensive mAb characterization. The current limitations, as well as possible solutions to overcome them, are also outlined. A primary limitation revealed by the results of the present study is that the expert knowledge in both experiment and data analysis is indispensable to practice TD/MD MS.Entities:
Keywords: FTMS; Fourier transform mass spectrometry; MS/MS; Therapeutic protein; glycoform; intact mass measurement; tandem mass spectrometry
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32812765 PMCID: PMC7539639 DOI: 10.1021/jasms.0c00036
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Am Soc Mass Spectrom ISSN: 1044-0305 Impact factor: 3.109