Vanessa Schieferbein1, Judith Bredemann2, R Schmitt2, I Stenin3, T Klenzner3, Jörg Schipper3, Julia Kristin3. 1. Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University Hospital Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany. vanessa.schieferbein@uni-duesseldorf.de. 2. Laboratory for Machine Tools and Production Engineering WZL, Chair of Production Metrology and Quality Management, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany. 3. Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University Hospital Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany.
Abstract
PURPOSE: With the increasing use of new minimally invasive approaches in temporal bone surgery, the need arises for evaluation of the risk of injury to sensitive anatomical structures. The factors that influence the measurement uncertainty (variation in representation of position and shape of anatomical structures) of imaging are of relevance. We investigate the effect of patients' anatomy on the measurement uncertainty of medical CT. METHODS: Six formalin-fixed temporal bones were used, fiducial markers were bone-implanted, and 20 CT scans of each temporal bone were generated. Surgically threatened anatomical structures of importance were defined. Manual segmentation was performed to create 3D surface models, and different Gaussian filters were applied. Analysis points were established along the border of the superior semicircular canal to determine the deviation between the 3D images of the labyrinth. The standard uncertainty was calculated, and one-way analysis of variance was performed (significance level = 5%) to evaluate the effect of certain factors (patient, side, Gaussian filter) on the measurement uncertainty. RESULTS: The influence of patient-specific anatomy on the measurement uncertainty of medical CT (p = 0.049) was demonstrated for the first time. The applied Gaussian filter (p = 0.622) and the patient's side (p = 0.341) showed no significant effect. CONCLUSION: The applied method and the results of the statistical analysis suggest that the patient's individual anatomical conditions affect the measurement uncertainty of medical CT. Thus, the patient's anatomy must be considered as an important influencing factor during risk evaluation concerning minimally invasive and image-guided surgery.
PURPOSE: With the increasing use of new minimally invasive approaches in temporal bone surgery, the need arises for evaluation of the risk of injury to sensitive anatomical structures. The factors that influence the measurement uncertainty (variation in representation of position and shape of anatomical structures) of imaging are of relevance. We investigate the effect of patients' anatomy on the measurement uncertainty of medical CT. METHODS: Six formalin-fixed temporal bones were used, fiducial markers were bone-implanted, and 20 CT scans of each temporal bone were generated. Surgically threatened anatomical structures of importance were defined. Manual segmentation was performed to create 3D surface models, and different Gaussian filters were applied. Analysis points were established along the border of the superior semicircular canal to determine the deviation between the 3D images of the labyrinth. The standard uncertainty was calculated, and one-way analysis of variance was performed (significance level = 5%) to evaluate the effect of certain factors (patient, side, Gaussian filter) on the measurement uncertainty. RESULTS: The influence of patient-specific anatomy on the measurement uncertainty of medical CT (p = 0.049) was demonstrated for the first time. The applied Gaussian filter (p = 0.622) and the patient's side (p = 0.341) showed no significant effect. CONCLUSION: The applied method and the results of the statistical analysis suggest that the patient's individual anatomical conditions affect the measurement uncertainty of medical CT. Thus, the patient's anatomy must be considered as an important influencing factor during risk evaluation concerning minimally invasive and image-guided surgery.
Entities:
Keywords:
Image-guided surgery; Measurement uncertainty; Medical computed tomography; Risk evaluation
Authors: G Strauss; I Hertel; J Dornheim; J Cordes; O Burgert; T Schulz; J Meixensberger; D Winkler; U Preim; A Dietz; B Preim Journal: Laryngorhinootologie Date: 2006-01-16 Impact factor: 1.057
Authors: Igor Stenin; Stefan Hansen; M Nau-Hermes; W El-Hakimi; M Becker; J Bredemann; J Kristin; T Klenzner; J Schipper Journal: Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg Date: 2017-02-14 Impact factor: 2.924
Authors: Marco Caversaccio; Kate Gavaghan; Wilhelm Wimmer; Tom Williamson; Juan Ansò; Georgios Mantokoudis; Nicolas Gerber; Christoph Rathgeb; Arne Feldmann; Franca Wagner; Olivier Scheidegger; Martin Kompis; Christian Weisstanner; Masoud Zoka-Assadi; Kai Roesler; Lukas Anschuetz; Markus Huth; Stefan Weber Journal: Acta Otolaryngol Date: 2017-02-01 Impact factor: 1.494
Authors: Liza J Stapleford; Joshua D Lawson; Charles Perkins; Scott Edelman; Lawrence Davis; Mark W McDonald; Anthony Waller; Eduard Schreibmann; Tim Fox Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2010-03-16 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Fitsum A Reda; Jack H Noble; Alejandro Rivas; Theodore R McRackan; Robert F Labadie; Benoit M Dawant Journal: Med Phys Date: 2011-10 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Robert F Labadie; Ramya Balachandran; Jason E Mitchell; Jack H Noble; Omid Majdani; David S Haynes; Marc L Bennett; Benoit M Dawant; J Michael Fitzpatrick Journal: Otol Neurotol Date: 2010-01 Impact factor: 2.311
Authors: Igor Stenin; Stefan Hansen; Meike Becker; Georgios Sakas; Dieter Fellner; Thomas Klenzner; Jörg Schipper Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2014-07-02 Impact factor: 3.411