Literature DB >> 15070258

Patient size and x-ray technique factors in head computed tomography examinations. I. Radiation doses.

Walter Huda1, Kristin A Lieberman, Jack Chang, Marsha L Roskopf.   

Abstract

We investigated how patient age, size and composition, together with the choice of x-ray technique factors, affect radiation doses in head computed tomography (CT) examinations. Head size dimensions, cross-sectional areas, and mean Hounsfield unit (HU) values were obtained from head CT images of 127 patients. For radiation dosimetry purposes patients were modeled as uniform cylinders of water. Dose computations were performed for 18 x 7 mm sections, scanned at a constant 340 mAs, for x-ray tube voltages ranging from 80 to 140 kV. Values of mean section dose, energy imparted, and effective dose were computed for patients ranging from the newborn to adults. There was a rapid growth of head size over the first two years, followed by a more modest increase of head size until the age of 18 or so. Newborns have a mean HU value of about 50 that monotonically increases with age over the first two decades of life. Average adult A-P and lateral dimensions were 186+/-8 mm and 147+/-8 mm, respectively, with an average HU value of 209+/-40. An infant head was found to be equivalent to a water cylinder with a radius of approximately 60 mm, whereas an adult head had an equivalent radius 50% greater. Adult males head dimensions are about 5% larger than for females, and their average x-ray attenuation is approximately 20 HU greater. For adult examinations performed at 120 kV, typical values were 32 mGy for the mean section dose, 105 mJ for the total energy imparted, and 0.64 mSv for the effective dose. Increasing the x-ray tube voltage from 80 to 140 kV increases patient doses by about a factor of 5. For the same technique factors, mean section doses in infants are 35% higher than in adults. Energy imparted for adults is 50% higher than for infants, but infant effective doses are four times higher than for adults. CT doses need to take into account patient age, head size, and composition as well as the selected x-ray technique factors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15070258     DOI: 10.1118/1.1646232

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  18 in total

1.  Radiation dose optimization in pediatric temporal bone computed tomography: influence of tube tension on image contrast and image quality.

Authors:  Claude Bertrand Nauer; Christoph Zubler; Christian Weisstanner; Christof Stieger; Pascal Senn; Andreas Arnold
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2011-09-23       Impact factor: 2.804

2.  In-patient to isocenter KERMA ratios in CT.

Authors:  Walter Huda; Kent M Ogden; Robert L Lavallee; Marsha L Roskopf; Ernest M Scalzetti
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Radiation dose reduction in computed tomography: techniques and future perspective.

Authors:  Lifeng Yu; Xin Liu; Shuai Leng; James M Kofler; Juan C Ramirez-Giraldo; Mingliang Qu; Jodie Christner; Joel G Fletcher; Cynthia H McCollough
Journal:  Imaging Med       Date:  2009-10

4.  Radiation exposure of patients in comprehensive computed tomography of the head in acute stroke.

Authors:  M Cohnen; H-J Wittsack; S Assadi; K Muskalla; A Ringelstein; L W Poll; A Saleh; U Mödder
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 3.825

5.  Suitability of helical multislice acquisition technique for routine unenhanced brain CT: an image quality study using a 16-row detector configuration.

Authors:  Danielle Hernalsteen; Guy Cosnard; Annie Robert; Cécile Grandin; Alain Vlassenbroek; Thierry Duprez
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-08-16       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Automatic exposure control systems designed to maintain constant image noise: effects on computed tomography dose and noise relative to clinically accepted technique charts.

Authors:  Christopher P Favazza; Lifeng Yu; Shuai Leng; James M Kofler; Cynthia H McCollough
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  2015 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.826

7.  Computed tomography angiography of the carotid arteries at low kV settings: a prospective randomised trial assessing radiation dose and diagnostic confidence.

Authors:  Dietrich Beitzke; Florian Wolf; Gundula Edelhauser; Christina Plank; Rüdiger Schernthaner; Michael Weber; Richard Nolz; Johannes Lammer; Christian Loewe
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-06-28       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Reply.

Authors:  R D Nawfel; G S Young
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2017-05-25       Impact factor: 3.825

9.  Radiation dose and image quality of 70 kVp cerebral CT angiography with optimized sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction: comparison with 120 kVp cerebral CT angiography.

Authors:  Guo Zhong Chen; Long Jiang Zhang; U Joseph Schoepf; Julian L Wichmann; Cole M Milliken; Chang Sheng Zhou; Li Qi; Song Luo; Guang Ming Lu
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-01-31       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Non-calcified coronary atherosclerotic plaque visualization on CT: effects of contrast-enhancement and lipid-content fractions.

Authors:  Wisnumurti Kristanto; Peter M A van Ooijen; Marcel J W Greuter; Jaap M Groen; Rozemarijn Vliegenthart; Matthijs Oudkerk
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2013-01-17       Impact factor: 2.357

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.