| Literature DB >> 30542408 |
Jia Mi1, Zudong Yin2, Xinyi Zhang2, Wushi Han2, Xiangsen Jiang2, Changbin Wang2, Xiaobao Li2, Zhangzhu Li2, Lei Yu2, Liang Yin2, Lin Cheng3.
Abstract
The present study aimed to investigate the correlation between the parameters of non-contrast helical computed tomography (NCHCT) and the total energy of holmium laser lithotripsy, and establish a correlative mathematical model. From March 2016 to February 2017, 120 patients with a single urinary calculus were examined by NCHCT prior to holmium laser lithotripsy. The calculus location was confirmed, the CT value was measured and the volume of the calculus in the established three-dimensional reconstruction model was calculated. The total energy of lithotripsy (TEL) was recorded post-operatively. A significant difference in the TEL between renal calculi and ureteral calculi was identified (P<0.001) and a high and significant correlation between the volume of the calculus and the TEL was determined (Spearman r=0.827, P<0.001). A moderate correlation was identified between the CT value of the calculus and the TEL (Spearman r=0.468, P<0.001). Multivariate linear regression analysis revealed that the location, the volume and the CT value of the calculus were independently associated with the TEL (F=288.858, adjusted R2=0.879, P<0.01). A mathematical model correlating the parameters of NCHCT with the TEL was established, which may provide a foundation to guide the use of energy in holmium laser lithotripsy, and it was possible to estimate the TEL by the location, the volume and the CT value of the calculus.Entities:
Keywords: calculus; holmium laser lithotripsy; non-contrast helical computed tomography
Year: 2018 PMID: 30542408 PMCID: PMC6257793 DOI: 10.3892/etm.2018.6765
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Exp Ther Med ISSN: 1792-0981 Impact factor: 2.447
Figure 1.Three-dimensional reconstruction model of the calculus in a patient.
Figure 2.CT value of the calculus of a patient. Hu, Hounsfield units; SD, standard deviation; Av, average CT value; Ar, area; CT, computed tomography.
Parameters of non-contrast helical computed tomography.
| Parameters | Value |
|---|---|
| Calculus location | |
| Renal | 48 (40) |
| Ureteral | 72 (60) |
| CT value (Hu) | 927.27±275.186 |
| Grade | |
| 1 (400 Hu) | 5 (4.2) |
| 2 (400–799 Hu) | 32 (26.7) |
| 3 (800–1,199 Hu) | 63 (52.5) |
| 4 (≥1,200 Hu) | 20 (16.6) |
| Calculus volume (mm3) | 485.35±195.349 |
Values are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation or n (%). Hu, hounsfield units; CT, computed tomography.
Results of Spearman's rank correlation analysis of the parameters of NCHCT and the total energy of holmium laser lithotripsy.
| Parameters | r | P-value |
|---|---|---|
| Calculus location | −0.819 | <0.001 |
| Calculus volume | 0.827 | <0.001 |
| CT Value | 0.468 | <0.001 |
CT, computed tomography.
Results of multivariate linear regression analysis of the variables estimating the total energy of holmium laser lithotripsy.
| Variables | B | SE | t | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constant | 753.328 | 67.941 | 11.088 | <0.001 |
| Calculus location | −328.835 | 32.965 | −9.975 | <0.001 |
| Calculus volume | 0.940 | 0.084 | 11.244 | <0.001 |
| CT value | −0.421 | 0.045 | 9.373 | <0.001 |
CT, computed tomography; B, partial regression coefficient SE, error of partial regression coefficient standard.
Figure 3.Normal P-P plot of regression-standardized residual. Cum prob, cumulative probability.
Figure 4.Histogram of regression standardized residual. Std. Dev., standard deviation.