Literature DB >> 18307379

Effectiveness of high-frequency holmium:YAG laser stone fragmentation: the "popcorn effect".

Sam N Chawla1, Mark F Chang, Andrew Chang, James Lenoir, Demetrius H Bagley.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To demonstrate the validity of non-contact holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser stone fragmentation in an in-vitro model and to characterize the optimal laser settings to perform this technique.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A caliceal model consisting of a glass test tube filled with 0.9% normal saline was created. Into this system, a 365-mum laser fiber was inserted after stabilization 2 mm above the surface of the stones. Laser experiments were conducted using tubes that contained four soda limestone phantoms with a total stone burden of approximately 0.2 g per tube. The laser energy was varied between 1.0 and 1.5 J, with a firing frequency of 20, 30, or 40 Hz. Ten tubes were tested at each setting combination for a duration of 2 minutes. Thus, 60 tubes were tested. The contents of each tube were filtered through a 2-mm sieve after treatment, and all remaining fragments were dried for 5 days. The fragments were weighed, and the difference from pretreatment was calculated. Differences in weights and laser settings were compared using one-tailed and two-sample t testing.
RESULTS: Each experiment resulted in a significant decrease in stone burden from prelaser weight (all P values = 0.00). Laser settings were manipulated between combinations of 1.0 J at a frequency of 20, 30, and 40 Hz, and an energy of 1.5 J and 20, 30, and 40 Hz. This resulted in a respective mean weight loss of -42%, -58%, and -47% at 1.0 J, and -24%, -56%, and -63% at 1.5 J. The t tests were performed to detect differences between weight loss and to determine the optimal settings. Laser settings of 1.5 J and 40 Hz for 2 minutes produced the greatest mean decrease in stone burden (63%). This loss was significantly different from that of all settings at 1.0 J and the setting of 1.5 and 20 Hz (P < 0.05). The mean percentage weight loss for each setting was then normalized to the total energy used. Settings of 1.0 J and 20 Hz were the most efficient, with a change in weight of -18% per kJ.
CONCLUSIONS: We duplicated the "popcorn effect" of non-contact laser use in vitro. In this model, the technique results in a significant decrease in stone burden (up to 63%) in just 2 minutes. Adequate energy and high frequency seemed to optimize the effectiveness of the method, but excessive energy and frequency produced diminishing returns.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18307379     DOI: 10.1089/end.2007.9843

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  16 in total

1.  Need for standardization in defining parameters and success in clinical trials involving surgical treatment of urinary lithiasis.

Authors:  Vincent G Bird; Victoria Y Bird
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Ho:YAG laser lithotripsy in non-contact mode: optimization of fiber to stone working distance to improve ablation efficiency.

Authors:  Vincent De Coninck; Etienne Xavier Keller; Paul Chiron; Laurian Dragos; Esteban Emiliani; Steeve Doizi; Laurent Berthe; Olivier Traxer
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 3.  Evaluation of dusting versus basketing - can new technologies improve stone-free rates?

Authors:  Brian Weiss; Ojas Shah
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2016-10-04       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 4.  Update on lasers in urology 2014: current assessment on holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Ho:YAG) laser lithotripter settings and laser fibers.

Authors:  Peter Kronenberg; Olivier Traxer
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-09-04       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 5.  Intracorporeal lithotripsy.

Authors:  Peter Alken
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 6.  Flexible ureteroscopy: technique, tips and tricks.

Authors:  Steeve Doizi; Olivier Traxer
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2017-12-08       Impact factor: 3.436

7.  Consultation on kidney stones, Copenhagen 2019: aspects of intracorporeal lithotripsy in flexible ureterorenoscopy.

Authors:  Søren Kissow Lildal; Kim Hovgaard Andreassen; Joyce Baard; Marianne Brehmer; Matthew Bultitude; Ylva Eriksson; Khurshid R Ghani; Helene Jung; Guido Kamphuis; Peter Kronenberg; Ben Turney; Olivier Traxer; Øyvind Ulvik; Palle Jörn Sloth Osther
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2020-10-16       Impact factor: 4.226

8.  Impact of pulse duration on Ho:YAG laser lithotripsy: fragmentation and dusting performance.

Authors:  Markus J Bader; Thomas Pongratz; Wael Khoder; Christian G Stief; Thomas Herrmann; Udo Nagele; Ronald Sroka
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 4.226

9.  Which is the best way to treat a stone on a flexible ureterorrenoscopy? | Opinion: Fragmentation.

Authors:  Alex Meller
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2017 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.541

Review 10.  Intracorporeal laser lithotripsy.

Authors:  Athanasios G Papatsoris; Andreas Skolarikos; Noor Buchholz
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2012-03-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.