Literature DB >> 24486000

Determinants of holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser time and energy during ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy.

Wilson R Molina1, Giovanni S Marchini2, Alexandre Pompeo1, David Sehrt1, Fernando J Kim1, Manoj Monga3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association of preoperative noncontrast computed tomography stone characteristics, laser settings, and stone composition with cumulative holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Ho:YAG) laser time/energy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent semirigid/flexible ureteroscopy and Ho:YAG laser lithotripsy (200 or 365 μm laser fiber; 0.8-1.0 J energy; and 8-10 Hz rate) at 2 tertiary care centers (April 2010-May 2012). Studied parameters were as follows: patient's characteristics; stone characteristics (location, burden, hardness, and composition); total laser time and energy; and surgical outcomes.
RESULTS: One hundred patients met our inclusion criteria. Mean stone size was 1.01 ± 0.42 cm and volume 0.33 ± 0.04 cm(3). Mean stone radiodensity was 990 ± 296 HU, and Hounsfield units density 13.8 ± 6.0 HU/mm. All patients were considered stone free. Stone size and volume had a significant positive correlation with laser energy (R = 0.516, P <.001; R = 0.621, P <.001) and laser time (R = 0.477, P <.001; R = 0.567, P <.001). When controlling for stone size, only the correlation between HU and laser time was significant (R = 0.262, P = .011). In the multivariate analysis, with exception of stone composition (P = .103), all parameters significantly increased laser energy (R(2) = 0.524). Multivariate analysis revealed a positive significant association of laser time with stone volume (P <.001) and Hounsfield units density (P <.001; R(2) = 0.512). In multivariate analysis for laser energy, only calcium phosphate stones required less energy to fragment compared with uric acid stones. No significant differences were found in the multivariate laser time model.
CONCLUSION: Ho:YAG laser cumulative energy and total time are significantly affected by stone dimensions, hardness location, fiber size, and power. Kidney location, laser fiber size, and laser power have more influence on the final laser energy than on the total laser time. Calcium phosphate stones require less laser energy to fragment.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24486000     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2013.11.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  9 in total

1.  Comparing the efficacy and safety of 365- and 550-μm laser fibers in semirigid ureteroscopic Ho:YAG lithotripsy.

Authors:  Stavros Sfoungaristos; Ofer N Gofrit; Ioannis Katafigiotis; Dov Pode; Ezekiel H Landau; Vladimir Yutkin; Constantinos A Constantinides; Mordechai Duvdevani
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2015-10-05       Impact factor: 2.370

2.  Ho:YAG laser lithotripsy in non-contact mode: optimization of fiber to stone working distance to improve ablation efficiency.

Authors:  Vincent De Coninck; Etienne Xavier Keller; Paul Chiron; Laurian Dragos; Esteban Emiliani; Steeve Doizi; Laurent Berthe; Olivier Traxer
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 3.  To Dust or Not To Dust: a Systematic Review of Ureteroscopic Laser Lithotripsy Techniques.

Authors:  Javier E Santiago; Adam B Hollander; Samit D Soni; Richard E Link; Wesley A Mayer
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 3.092

4.  Influence of saline on temperature profile of laser lithotripsy activation.

Authors:  Wilson R Molina; Igor N Silva; Rodrigo Donalisio da Silva; Diedra Gustafson; David Sehrt; Fernando J Kim
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2014-10-10       Impact factor: 2.942

Review 5.  Intracorporeal lithotripsy.

Authors:  Peter Alken
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 6.  Generated temperatures and thermal laser damage during upper tract endourological procedures using the holmium: yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Ho:YAG) laser: a systematic review of experimental studies.

Authors:  Patrick Rice; Bhaskar Kumar Somani; Udo Nagele; Thomas R W Herrmann; Theodoros Tokas
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2022-03-31       Impact factor: 3.661

7.  How do we assess the efficacy of Ho:YAG low-power laser lithotripsy for the treatment of upper tract urinary stones? Introducing the Joules/mm3 and laser activity concepts.

Authors:  Eugenio Ventimiglia; Felipe Pauchard; Antonio Rebello Horta Gorgen; Frédéric Panthier; Steeve Doizi; Olivier Traxer
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2020-05-27       Impact factor: 4.226

8.  Study of non-contrast helical computed tomography in evaluating holmium laser lithotripsy for urinary calculus.

Authors:  Jia Mi; Zudong Yin; Xinyi Zhang; Wushi Han; Xiangsen Jiang; Changbin Wang; Xiaobao Li; Zhangzhu Li; Lei Yu; Liang Yin; Lin Cheng
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 2.447

9.  Combining ultrasonography and noncontrast helical computerized tomography to evaluate Holmium laser lithotripsy.

Authors:  Jia Mi; Jie Li; Qinglu Zhang; Xing Wang; Hongyu Liu; Yanlu Cao; Xiaoyan Liu; Xiao Sun; Mengmeng Shang; Qing Liu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 1.817

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.