Literature DB >> 11956420

Treatment of proximal ureteral calculi: holmium:YAG laser ureterolithotripsy versus extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.

John S Lam1, Tricia D Greene, Mantu Gupta.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We compared the safety and efficacy of ureteroscopy with intracorporeal holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) (Dornier Medical Systems, Inc., Marietta, Georgia) for proximal ureteral calculi.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 67 patients underwent 81 primary procedures, including in situ ESWL with a DoLi 50 lithotriptor (Dornier Medical Systems, Inc.) or ureteroscopy combined with holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy for proximal ureteral calculi.
RESULTS: Of the primary procedures 81 involved proximal ureteral calculi, including 35 done for calculi 1 cm. or greater. The initial stone-free rate in patients with calculi 1 cm. or greater was 93% for ureteroscopy combined with holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy and 50% for in situ ESWL. The efficiency quotient for treating proximal ureteral calculi 1 cm. or greater was calculated as 0.76 for ureteroscopic lithotripsy and 0.43 for ESWL. For proximal ureteral calculi less than 1 cm. the initial stone-free rate was 100% and 80% for ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy and ESWL, respectively. The efficiency quotient was calculated as 0.81 for ureteroscopic lithotripsy and 0.72 for ESWL for treating proximal ureteral calculi less than 1 cm. There were no major complications in either group and all procedures were performed on an outpatient basis.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates that ureteroscopy combined with holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy is an acceptable treatment modality for all proximal ureteral calculi and excellent results are achieved for calculi 1 cm. or larger. Although the stone-free rate was better for smaller stones with ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy, efficiency quotients were similar. Therefore, ESWL should remain first line therapy for proximal ureteral calculi less than 1 cm. because of less morbidity, and a lesser anesthesia and analgesic requirement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11956420

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  36 in total

1.  Value of focal applied energy quotient in treatment of ureteral lithiasis with shock waves.

Authors:  Miguel Angel Arrabal-Polo; Miguel Arrabal-Martin; Francisco Palao-Yago; Jose Luis Mijan-Ortiz; Armando Zuluaga-Gomez
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2011-10-15

2.  Effectiveness of ultrasonography in the postoperative follow-up of pediatric patients undergoing ureteroscopic stone manipulation.

Authors:  Berkan Resorlu; Cengiz Kara; Eylem Burcu Resorlu; Ali Unsal
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 1.827

Review 3.  The clinical efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in pediatric urolithiasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Pei Lu; Zijie Wang; Rijin Song; Xiaolan Wang; Kai Qi; Qiying Dai; Wei Zhang; Min Gu
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 3.436

4.  Treatment of ureteral stones using Holmium:YAG laser.

Authors:  Y Ilker; A Ozgür; C Yazici
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 5.  Removal of ureteral stones with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopic procedures. What can we learn from the literature in terms of results and treatment efforts?

Authors:  Hans-Göran Tiselius
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2005-05-29

6.  Comparison of two different running models for the shock wave lithotripsy machine in Taipei City Hospital: self-support versus outsourcing cooperation.

Authors:  Chi-Yi Huang; Shiou-Sheng Chen; Li-Kuei Chen
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2009-07-14

7.  Flexible ureterorenoscopy and laser lithotripsy in children.

Authors:  When-Chan Yeow; Richard Pemberton; Andrew Barker
Journal:  J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg       Date:  2009-04

8.  Comparison of Patient Satisfaction with Treatment Outcomes between Ureteroscopy and Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Proximal Ureteral Stones.

Authors:  Jong-Hyun Lee; Seung Hyo Woo; Eun Tak Kim; Dae Kyung Kim; Jinsung Park
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2010-11-17

9.  Shock wave lithotripsy versus ureteroscopy for ureteral calculi: a prospective assessment of patient-reported outcomes.

Authors:  Jinsung Park; Dong Wook Shin; Jae Hoon Chung; Seung Wook Lee
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2012-10-18       Impact factor: 4.226

10.  Ureteroscopic holmium: YAG laser lithotripsy for managing ureteral calculi (a report of 168 cases).

Authors:  Zili Pang; Chuanguo Xiao; Fuqing Zeng
Journal:  J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci       Date:  2004
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.