| Literature DB >> 30498403 |
N B Spath1, D M L Lilburn2, G A Gray1, L M Le Page1, G Papanastasiou1, R J Lennen1,3, R L Janiczek4, M R Dweck1,5, D E Newby1,5, P C Yang6, M A Jansen1,3, S I Semple1.
Abstract
Background: Manganese-enhanced MRI (MEMRI) has the potential to identify viable myocardium and quantify calcium influx and handling. Two distinct manganese contrast media have been developed for clinical application, mangafodipir and EVP1001-1, employing different strategies to mitigate against adverse effects resulting from calcium-channel agonism. Mangafodipir delivers manganese ions as a chelate, and EVP1001-1 coadministers calcium gluconate. Using myocardial T1 mapping, we aimed to explore chelated and nonchelated manganese contrast agents, their mechanism of myocardial uptake, and their application to infarcted hearts.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30498403 PMCID: PMC6222240 DOI: 10.1155/2018/9641527
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Contrast Media Mol Imaging ISSN: 1555-4309 Impact factor: 3.161
Figure 1Myocardial infarction experimental protocol. Flow chart detailing timing of surgery and imaging with different contrast agents.
Figure 2T1 shortening of manganese contrast media over time. (a) Normalized T1 maps acquired subsequent to infusion of MnCl2, EVP1001-1, and mangafodipir at 20 minute intervals up to 60 minutes, with associated gradient echo cine images in end-diastole and end-systole. MnCl2 (22 μmol/kg), EVP1001-1 (22 μmol/kg) or mangafodipir (44 μmol/kg) was administered intravenously to isoflurane-anaesthetised healthy rats over 3-4 minutes. Rats were simultaneously administered an infusion of 8 mL/kg 0.9% saline over 3-4 minutes. Note the superior degree of T1 shortening with MnCl2, and EVP1001-1 at half the molar dosage of manganese as compared with mangafodipir (T1 reduction of 421.3 ms and 357.9 ms from baseline with MnCl2 and EVP1001-1 compared with 222.7 ms with mangafodipir). (b) Reduction in mean left ventricular T1 values over 60 minutes with EVP1001-1 and mangafodipir. MnCl2 (22 μmol/kg; blue), EVP1001-1 (22 μmol/kg; red), mangafodipir (22 (green) or 44 (purple) μmol/kg) was administered to rats (n=4 per group) over 3-4 min. Error bars represent standard deviations from time points where measurements were recorded (n=4 at each time point). Two-way ANOVA confirmed a dependence of mean myocardial T1 shortening between each of the contrast agents (P < 0.0001).
Effect of diltiazem on manganese-induced T1 shortening.
| Time point (minutes) | Baseline T1 (ms) | Mean T1 shortening (ms) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 | 20 | 40 | 60 | ||
| MnCl2 + saline | 1286 ± 42 | 366 ± 72 | 382 ± 72 | 389 ± 67 | 351 ± 35 |
| MnCl2 + diltiazem ( | 1180 ± 93 | 290 ± 52 | 288 ± 71 | 276 ± 56 | 274 ± 63 |
| EVP1001-1 + saline | 1265 ± 94 | 354 ± 91 | 397 ± 73 | 352 ± 54 | 383 ± 87 |
| EVP1001-1 + diltiazem | 1375 ± 38 | 209 ± 27 | 225 ± 57 | 211 ± 49 | 226 ± 40 |
| Mangafodipir + saline | 1366 ± 94 | 142 ± 52 | 178 ± 59 | 206 ± 53 | 220 ± 61 |
| Mangafodipir + diltiazem | 1219 ± 69 | 96 ± 34 | 128 ± 42 | 158 ± 66 | 177 ± 24 |
Healthy rats (group sizes n=4 unless otherwise stated) administered MnCl2 (22 μmol/kg), EVP1001-1 (22 μmol/kg), or mangafodipir (44 μmol/kg) over 3-4 min with simultaneous administration of 0.9% saline or diltiazem (100–200 µmol/kg/min) infusion. Note the approximate 30% reduction in mean myocardial T1 values at each time point, but that there is greater discrimination between the diltiazem and saline infused rats due to the superior T1 shortening with EVP1001-1. Post hoc Bonferroni multiple comparisons (manganese agent + saline; manganese agent + diltiazem). Significance P < 0.05 at each time point as compared with saline control is indicated by asterisk.
Mean LVEF and mean difference in LVEF versus baseline for the cohort of healthy rats administered MnCl2, EVP1001-1, and mangafodipir.
| Time point (minutes) | Mean LVEF (%) and mean difference in LVEF (%) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline | 15 | 30 | 50 | |
| MnCl2 + saline | 67.5 ± 5.6 | 73.4 ± 6.3 | 72.4 ± 5.6 | 71.1 ± 2.0 |
| Mean difference (vs. baseline) | — | 5.8 ± 1.3 | 4.9 ± 2.6 | 3.6 ± 5.1 |
| MnCl2 + diltiazem | 65.0 ± 8.0 | 58.2 ± 3.9 | 58.3 ± 6.8 | 60.1 ± 12.5 |
| Mean difference (vs. baseline) | — | −3.2 ± 0.6 | −3.1 ± 2.6 | −4.8 ± 5.1 |
| EVP1001-1 + saline | 65.3 ± 0.7 | 71.0 ± 5.5 | 67.1 ± 2.5 | 67.1 ± 3.8 |
| Mean difference (vs. baseline) | — | 4.0 ± 6.8 | −0.3 ± 2.6 | 0.7 ± 5.5 |
| EVP1001-1 + diltiazem | 69.6 ± 6.4 | 68.3 ± 8.4 | 63.4 ± 7.3 | 65.6 ± 7.8 |
| Mean difference (vs. baseline) | — | −0.5 ± 3.7 | −4.1 ± 4.0 | −4.1 ± 3.7 |
| Mangafodipir 22 | 63.2 ± 6.3 | 66.9 ( | 65.8 ± 8.2 | 67.1 ± 7.4 |
| Mean difference (vs. baseline) | — | 6.9 ( | 4.7 ± 7.1 | 2.5 ± 4.5 |
| Mangafodipir 44 | 73.5 ± 3.1 | 76.8 ( | 76.1 ± 4.9 | 77.0 ± 4.1 |
| Mean difference (vs. baseline) | — | 3.9 ( | 4.5 ± 1.1 | 4.6 ± 3.6 |
| Mangafodipir 44 | 64.1 ± 4.8 | 64.0 ± 8.1 | 62.5 ± 7.3 | 62.0 ± 9.5 |
| Mean difference (vs. baseline) | — | 0.81 ± 6.53 | −0.2 ± 6.9 | −1.0 ± 4.7 |
Group sizes n=3 for EVP1001-1 and mangafodipir 22 μmol/kg and n=4 for MnCl2 and mangafodipir 44 μmol/kg. Calculation of mean only from those time points with n=2 measurements available. Post hoc Bonferroni multiple comparisons significance P < 0.05 at each time point as compared to saline control indicated by asterisk.
Figure 3Comparison of the effects of contrast agents on T1 relaxivity. Mean T1 is significantly different between remote and infarcted areas of myocardium for all agents and native T1 mapping (all P<0.0001). Remote myocardial T1 between manganese contrast agents was comparable (P=0.064).
Figure 4Comparison of DEMRI and MEMRI infarct quantification by T1 mapping. Mean infarct size as a percentage of left ventricular myocardium at maximal infarct short-axis slice in rats with DEMRI and MEMRI T1 mapping at two time points; early post-MI (3 weeks, n=13, left panel) and late post-MI (12 weeks, n=12, right panel). Infarct size as assessed by MEMRI T1 mapping is significantly lower than DEMRI T1 mapping at 3 weeks (P<0.05), a result which is attenuated at 12 weeks (P=0.067). Error bars represent standard deviation. Example T1 maps with delayed enhancement and gradient echo cine images are shown for one animal.
Figure 5DEMRI versus MEMRI vs MTC. (a) Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and histological quantification of infarct size. Infarct size as a percentage of left ventricular myocardium at maximal infarct short-axis slice by DEMRI and MEMRI T1 mapping and histologically with MTC. Note the inverted T1 colour map configuration between DEMRI T1 mapping and MEMRI T1 mapping, calibrated to define infarct (pink) and remote (green) myocardium with intermediate values (yellow). (b) Bland–Altman plots showing differences between DEMRI inversion recovery (A), DEMRI T1 mapping (B), and MEMRI T1 mapping (C) for each rat heart. The average difference (bias) between the measurements is shown (dashed lines) ±2 × SD (dotted lines) for all three modalities.
Figure 6∆T1 in remote myocardium over time versus ejection fraction. Correlation of change in remote myocardial T1 relaxivity between early and late time points with ejection fraction at 12 weeks after surgery. There is a significant correlation between ejection fraction and T1 reduction between early (3 week) and late (12 week) time points (r=0.61, P=0.022). Standard error of the mean shown as dashed black line.