BACKGROUND: Changes in the myocardium in acute ischemia are dynamic and complex, and the characteristics of myocardial tissue on cardiovascular magnetic resonance in the acute setting are not fully defined. We investigated changes in edema and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) with serial imaging early after acute myocardial infarction, relating these to global and segmental myocardial function at 6 months. METHODS AND RESULTS: Cardiovascular magnetic resonance scans were performed on 30 patients with ST-elevation--myocardial infarction treated by primary percutaneous coronary intervention at each of 4 time points: 12 to 48 hours; 5 to 7 days; 14 to 17 days; and 6 months. All patients showed edema at 24 hours. The mean volume of edema (% left ventricle) was 37±16 at 24 hours and 39±17 at 1 week, with a reduction to 24±13 (P<0.01) by 2 weeks. Myocardial segments with edema also had increased signal on LGE at 24 hours (κ=0.77; P<0.001). The volume of LGE decreased significantly between 24 hours and 6 months (27±15% versus 22±12%; P=0.002). Of segments showing LGE at 24 hours, 50% showed resolution by 6 months. In segments with such a reduction in LGE, 65% also showed improved wall motion (P<0.0001). The area of LGE measured at 6 months correlated more strongly with troponin at 48 hours (r=0.9; P<0.01) than LGE at 24 hours (r=0.7). The difference in LGE between 24 hours and 6 months had profound effects on the calculation of salvage index (26±21% at 24 hours versus 42±23% at 6 months; P=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Myocardial edema is maximal and constant over the first week after myocardial infarction, providing a stable window for the retrospective evaluation of area at risk. By contrast, myocardial areas with high signal intensity in LGE images recede over time with corresponding recovery of function, indicating that acutely detected LGE does not necessarily equate with irreversible injury and may severely underestimate salvaged myocardium.
BACKGROUND: Changes in the myocardium in acute ischemia are dynamic and complex, and the characteristics of myocardial tissue on cardiovascular magnetic resonance in the acute setting are not fully defined. We investigated changes in edema and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) with serial imaging early after acute myocardial infarction, relating these to global and segmental myocardial function at 6 months. METHODS AND RESULTS: Cardiovascular magnetic resonance scans were performed on 30 patients with ST-elevation--myocardial infarction treated by primary percutaneous coronary intervention at each of 4 time points: 12 to 48 hours; 5 to 7 days; 14 to 17 days; and 6 months. All patients showed edema at 24 hours. The mean volume of edema (% left ventricle) was 37±16 at 24 hours and 39±17 at 1 week, with a reduction to 24±13 (P<0.01) by 2 weeks. Myocardial segments with edema also had increased signal on LGE at 24 hours (κ=0.77; P<0.001). The volume of LGE decreased significantly between 24 hours and 6 months (27±15% versus 22±12%; P=0.002). Of segments showing LGE at 24 hours, 50% showed resolution by 6 months. In segments with such a reduction in LGE, 65% also showed improved wall motion (P<0.0001). The area of LGE measured at 6 months correlated more strongly with troponin at 48 hours (r=0.9; P<0.01) than LGE at 24 hours (r=0.7). The difference in LGE between 24 hours and 6 months had profound effects on the calculation of salvage index (26±21% at 24 hours versus 42±23% at 6 months; P=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Myocardial edema is maximal and constant over the first week after myocardial infarction, providing a stable window for the retrospective evaluation of area at risk. By contrast, myocardial areas with high signal intensity in LGE images recede over time with corresponding recovery of function, indicating that acutely detected LGE does not necessarily equate with irreversible injury and may severely underestimate salvaged myocardium.
Authors: Andrew T Yan; Adolphe J Shayne; Kenneth A Brown; Sandeep N Gupta; Carmen W Chan; Tuan M Luu; Marcelo F Di Carli; H Glenn Reynolds; William G Stevenson; Raymond Y Kwong Journal: Circulation Date: 2006-06-26 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: R J Kim; D S Fieno; T B Parrish; K Harris; E L Chen; O Simonetti; J Bundy; J P Finn; F J Klocke; R M Judd Journal: Circulation Date: 1999-11-09 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: W J Rogers; C M Kramer; G Geskin; Y L Hu; T M Theobald; D A Vido; S Petruolo; N Reichek Journal: Circulation Date: 1999-02-16 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Hassan Abdel-Aty; Myra Cocker; Cheryl Meek; John V Tyberg; Matthias G Friedrich Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2009-04-07 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Aernout M Beek; Harald P Kühl; Olga Bondarenko; Jos W R Twisk; Mark B M Hofman; Willem G van Dockum; Cees A Visser; Albert C van Rossum Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2003-09-03 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Sophia Hammer-Hansen; Martin Ugander; Li-Yueh Hsu; Joni Taylor; Jens Jakob Thune; Lars Køber; Peter Kellman; Andrew E Arai Journal: Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2014-05-07 Impact factor: 6.875
Authors: Sophia Hammer-Hansen; Steve W Leung; Li-Yueh Hsu; Joel R Wilson; Joni Taylor; Anders M Greve; Jens Jakob Thune; Lars Køber; Peter Kellman; Andrew E Arai Journal: JACC Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2016-09-21
Authors: Xavier Rossello; Antonio Piñero; Rodrigo Fernández-Jiménez; Javier Sánchez-González; Gonzalo Pizarro; Carlos Galán-Arriola; Manuel Lobo-Gonzalez; Jean Paul Vilchez; Jaime García-Prieto; Jose Manuel García-Ruiz; Ana García-Álvarez; David Sanz-Rosa; Borja Ibanez Journal: J Cardiovasc Transl Res Date: 2018-08-02 Impact factor: 4.132