Literature DB >> 30487289

Optimizing CRISPR/Cas9 technology for precise correction of the Fgfr3-G374R mutation in achondroplasia in mice.

Kai Miao1,2, Xin Zhang1,3, Sek Man Su1,2, Jianming Zeng1,2, Zebin Huang1,2, Un In Chan1,3, Xiaoling Xu4,2,3, Chu-Xia Deng5,2.   

Abstract

CRISPR/Cas9 is a powerful technology widely used for genome editing, with the potential to be used for correcting a wide variety of deleterious disease-causing mutations. However, the technique tends to generate more indels (insertions and deletions) than precise modifications at the target sites, which might not resolve the mutation and could instead exacerbate the initial genetic disruption. We sought to develop an improved protocol for CRISPR/Cas9 that would correct mutations without unintended consequences. As a case study, we focused on achondroplasia, a common genetic form of dwarfism defined by missense mutation in the Fgfr3 gene that results in glycine to arginine substitution at position 374 in mice in fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 (Fgfr3-G374R), which corresponds to G380R in humans. First, we designed a GFP reporter system that can evaluate the cutting efficiency and specificity of single guide RNAs (sgRNAs). Using the sgRNA selected based on our GFP reporter system, we conducted targeted therapy of achondroplasia in mice. We found that we achieved higher frequency of precise correction of the Fgfr3-G374R mutation using Cas9 protein rather than Cas9 mRNA. We further demonstrated that targeting oligos of 100 and 200 nucleotides precisely corrected the mutation at equal efficiency. We showed that our strategy completely suppressed phenotypes of achondroplasia and whole genome sequencing detected no off-target effects. These data indicate that improved protocols can enable the precise CRISPR/Cas9-mediated correction of individual mutations with high fidelity.
© 2019 Miao et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CRISPR/Cas; bone; fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR); gene therapy; genetic disease

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30487289      PMCID: PMC6349110          DOI: 10.1074/jbc.RA118.006496

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Chem        ISSN: 0021-9258            Impact factor:   5.157


  34 in total

1.  Reexamination of gene targeting frequency as a function of the extent of homology between the targeting vector and the target locus.

Authors:  C Deng; M R Capecchi
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 4.272

Review 2.  Achondroplasia: Development, pathogenesis, and therapy.

Authors:  David M Ornitz; Laurence Legeai-Mallet
Journal:  Dev Dyn       Date:  2017-03-02       Impact factor: 3.780

3.  Response to "Unexpected mutations after CRISPR-Cas9 editing in vivo".

Authors:  Lauryl M J Nutter; Jason D Heaney; K C Kent Lloyd; Stephen A Murray; John R Seavitt; William C Skarnes; Lydia Teboul; Steve D M Brown; Mark Moore
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2018-03-30       Impact factor: 28.547

4.  Postnatal genome editing partially restores dystrophin expression in a mouse model of muscular dystrophy.

Authors:  Chengzu Long; Leonela Amoasii; Alex A Mireault; John R McAnally; Hui Li; Efrain Sanchez-Ortiz; Samadrita Bhattacharyya; John M Shelton; Rhonda Bassel-Duby; Eric N Olson
Journal:  Science       Date:  2015-12-31       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  A common FGFR3 gene mutation is present in achondroplasia but not in hypochondroplasia.

Authors:  I Stoilov; M W Kilpatrick; P Tsipouras
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  1995-01-02

6.  Response to "Unexpected mutations after CRISPR-Cas9 editing in vivo".

Authors:  Caleb A Lareau; Kendell Clement; Jonathan Y Hsu; Vikram Pattanayak; J Keith Joung; Martin J Aryee; Luca Pinello
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2018-03-30       Impact factor: 28.547

Review 7.  Delivery approaches for CRISPR/Cas9 therapeutics in vivo: advances and challenges.

Authors:  D C Luther; Y W Lee; H Nagaraj; F Scaletti; V M Rotello
Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Deliv       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 6.648

8.  Prediction of off-target activities for the end-to-end design of CRISPR guide RNAs.

Authors:  Jennifer Listgarten; Michael Weinstein; Benjamin P Kleinstiver; Alexander A Sousa; J Keith Joung; Jake Crawford; Kevin Gao; Luong Hoang; Melih Elibol; John G Doench; Nicolo Fusi
Journal:  Nat Biomed Eng       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 25.671

Review 9.  CRISPR-Cas guides the future of genetic engineering.

Authors:  Gavin J Knott; Jennifer A Doudna
Journal:  Science       Date:  2018-08-31       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Evaluation of off-target and on-target scoring algorithms and integration into the guide RNA selection tool CRISPOR.

Authors:  Maximilian Haeussler; Kai Schönig; Hélène Eckert; Alexis Eschstruth; Joffrey Mianné; Jean-Baptiste Renaud; Sylvie Schneider-Maunoury; Alena Shkumatava; Lydia Teboul; Jim Kent; Jean-Stephane Joly; Jean-Paul Concordet
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2016-07-05       Impact factor: 13.583

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Genome Editing in Medicine: Tools and Challenges.

Authors:  Gunda Petraitytė; Eglė Preikšaitienė; Violeta Mikštienė
Journal:  Acta Med Litu       Date:  2021-08-17

Review 2.  MS-based strategies for identification of protein SUMOylation modification.

Authors:  Zenghua Sheng; Xixi Wang; Yanni Ma; Dan Zhang; Yanfang Yang; Peng Zhang; Hongxia Zhu; Ningzhi Xu; Shufang Liang
Journal:  Electrophoresis       Date:  2019-06-27       Impact factor: 3.535

Review 3.  FGF/FGFR signaling in health and disease.

Authors:  Yangli Xie; Nan Su; Jing Yang; Qiaoyan Tan; Shuo Huang; Min Jin; Zhenhong Ni; Bin Zhang; Dali Zhang; Fengtao Luo; Hangang Chen; Xianding Sun; Jian Q Feng; Huabing Qi; Lin Chen
Journal:  Signal Transduct Target Ther       Date:  2020-09-02

Review 4.  Current trends in gene recovery mediated by the CRISPR-Cas system.

Authors:  Hyeon-Ki Jang; Beomjong Song; Gue-Ho Hwang; Sangsu Bae
Journal:  Exp Mol Med       Date:  2020-07-10       Impact factor: 8.718

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.