Literature DB >> 29600991

Response to "Unexpected mutations after CRISPR-Cas9 editing in vivo".

Lauryl M J Nutter1,2, Jason D Heaney3, K C Kent Lloyd4, Stephen A Murray5, John R Seavitt3, William C Skarnes6, Lydia Teboul7, Steve D M Brown1,7, Mark Moore1.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2018        PMID： 29600991     DOI： 10.1038/nmeth.4559

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Methods        ISSN： 1548-7091            Impact factor:   28.547


× No keyword cloud information.
  8 in total

1.  Heritable gene targeting in the mouse and rat using a CRISPR-Cas system.

Authors:  Dali Li; Zhongwei Qiu; Yanjiao Shao; Yuting Chen; Yuting Guan; Meizhen Liu; Yongmei Li; Na Gao; Liren Wang; Xiaoling Lu; Yongxiang Zhao; Mingyao Liu
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 54.908

Review 2.  CRISPR-Cas9 Structures and Mechanisms.

Authors:  Fuguo Jiang; Jennifer A Doudna
Journal:  Annu Rev Biophys       Date:  2017-03-30       Impact factor: 12.981

3.  Unexpected mutations after CRISPR-Cas9 editing in vivo.

Authors:  Kellie A Schaefer; Wen-Hsuan Wu; Diana F Colgan; Stephen H Tsang; Alexander G Bassuk; Vinit B Mahajan
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 28.547

4.  Off-target mutations are rare in Cas9-modified mice.

Authors:  Vivek Iyer; Bin Shen; Wensheng Zhang; Alex Hodgkins; Thomas Keane; Xingxu Huang; William C Skarnes
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 28.547

5.  Germline mutation rates and the long-term phenotypic effects of mutation accumulation in wild-type laboratory mice and mutator mice.

Authors:  Arikuni Uchimura; Mayumi Higuchi; Yohei Minakuchi; Mizuki Ohno; Atsushi Toyoda; Asao Fujiyama; Ikuo Miura; Shigeharu Wakana; Jo Nishino; Takeshi Yagi
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2015-06-30       Impact factor: 9.043

6.  Heritable and precise zebrafish genome editing using a CRISPR-Cas system.

Authors:  Woong Y Hwang; Yanfang Fu; Deepak Reyon; Morgan L Maeder; Prakriti Kaini; Jeffry D Sander; J Keith Joung; Randall T Peterson; Jing-Ruey Joanna Yeh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-09       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Exome sequencing in the knockin mice generated using the CRISPR/Cas system.

Authors:  Kazuo Nakajima; An-A Kazuno; John Kelsoe; Moe Nakanishi; Toru Takumi; Tadafumi Kato
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-10-04       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Correction of the auditory phenotype in C57BL/6N mice via CRISPR/Cas9-mediated homology directed repair.

Authors:  Joffrey Mianné; Lauren Chessum; Saumya Kumar; Carlos Aguilar; Gemma Codner; Marie Hutchison; Andrew Parker; Ann-Marie Mallon; Sara Wells; Michelle M Simon; Lydia Teboul; Steve D M Brown; Michael R Bowl
Journal:  Genome Med       Date:  2016-02-15       Impact factor: 11.117
  8 in total
  11 in total

Review 1.  Technologies and Computational Analysis Strategies for CRISPR Applications.

Authors:  Kendell Clement; Jonathan Y Hsu; Matthew C Canver; J Keith Joung; Luca Pinello
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2020-07-02       Impact factor: 17.970

2.  Optimizing CRISPR/Cas9 technology for precise correction of the Fgfr3-G374R mutation in achondroplasia in mice.

Authors:  Kai Miao; Xin Zhang; Sek Man Su; Jianming Zeng; Zebin Huang; Un In Chan; Xiaoling Xu; Chu-Xia Deng
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2018-11-28       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  Unexpected mutations were expected and unrelated to CRISPR-Cas9 activity.

Authors:  Lluis Montoliu; C Bruce A Whitelaw
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2018-05-31       Impact factor: 2.788

4.  Illuminating the genome-wide activity of genome editors for safe and effective therapeutics.

Authors:  Yong Cheng; Shengdar Q Tsai
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2018-12-22       Impact factor: 13.583

Review 5.  Generating mouse models for biomedical research: technological advances.

Authors:  Channabasavaiah B Gurumurthy; Kevin C Kent Lloyd
Journal:  Dis Model Mech       Date:  2019-01-08       Impact factor: 5.758

6.  Off- and on-target effects of genome editing in mouse embryos.

Authors:  Shinya Ayabe; Kenichi Nakashima; Atsushi Yoshiki
Journal:  J Reprod Dev       Date:  2018-12-06       Impact factor: 2.214

7.  Optimized CRISPR guide RNA design for two high-fidelity Cas9 variants by deep learning.

Authors:  Daqi Wang; Chengdong Zhang; Bei Wang; Bin Li; Qiang Wang; Dong Liu; Hongyan Wang; Yan Zhou; Leming Shi; Feng Lan; Yongming Wang
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-09-19       Impact factor: 14.919

8.  No excessive mutations in transcription activator-like effector nuclease-mediated α-1,3-galactosyltransferase knockout Yucatan miniature pigs.

Authors:  Kimyung Choi; Joohyun Shim; Nayoung Ko; Joonghoon Park
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-08-23       Impact factor: 2.509

Review 9.  Variability in Genome Editing Outcomes: Challenges for Research Reproducibility and Clinical Safety.

Authors:  Lydia Teboul; Yann Herault; Sara Wells; Waseem Qasim; Guillaume Pavlovic
Journal:  Mol Ther       Date:  2020-03-20       Impact factor: 11.454

10.  Trio deep-sequencing does not reveal unexpected off-target and on-target mutations in Cas9-edited rhesus monkeys.

Authors:  Xin Luo; Yaoxi He; Chao Zhang; Xiechao He; Lanzhen Yan; Min Li; Ting Hu; Yan Hu; Jin Jiang; Xiaoyu Meng; Weizhi Ji; Xudong Zhao; Ping Zheng; Shuhua Xu; Bing Su
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-12-04       Impact factor: 14.919
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.