Literature DB >> 30485668

ABPI reporting and compression recommendations in global clinical practice guidelines on venous leg ulcer management: A scoping review.

Carolina D Weller1, Victoria Team1, John D Ivory2, Kimberley Crawford1, Georgina Gethin2.   

Abstract

Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for venous leg ulcer (VLU) management recommend below-knee compression to improve healing outcomes after calculating the ankle-brachial pressure index (ABPI) to rule out significant arterial disease. This systematic scoping review aimed to complete a qualitative and quantitative content analysis of international CPGs for VLU management to determine if consensus existed in relation to recommendations for compression application based on an ABPI reading and clinical assessment. Our review shows that there is a lack of consensus across 13 VLU CPGs and a lack of clear guidance in relation to the specific ABPI range of compression therapy that can be safely applied. An area of uncertainty and disagreement exists in relation to an ABPI between 0.6 and 0.8, with some guidelines advocating that compression is contraindicated and others that there should be reduced compression. This has implications in clinical practice, including when it is safe to apply compression. In addition, the inconsistency in the levels of evidence and the grades of recommendation makes it difficult to compare across various guidelines.
© 2018 Medicalhelplines.com Inc and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ankle-brachial pressure index (ABPI); clinical practice guidelines; consistency; scoping review; venous leg ulcers

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30485668      PMCID: PMC7949354          DOI: 10.1111/iwj.13048

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Wound J        ISSN: 1742-4801            Impact factor:   3.315


  25 in total

1.  Reliability of Doppler and stethoscope methods of determining systolic blood pressures: considerations for calculating an ankle-brachial index.

Authors:  Steven B Chesbro; Elmira T Asongwed; Jamesha Brown; Emmanuel B John
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2011 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.798

Review 2.  The validity, reliability, reproducibility and extended utility of ankle to brachial pressure index in current vascular surgical practice.

Authors:  M F Caruana; A W Bradbury; D J Adam
Journal:  Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 7.069

Review 3.  ABPI reporting and compression recommendations in global clinical practice guidelines on venous leg ulcer management: A scoping review.

Authors:  Carolina D Weller; Victoria Team; John D Ivory; Kimberley Crawford; Georgina Gethin
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2018-11-28       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 4.  Wound Healing Society (WHS) venous ulcer treatment guidelines: what's new in five years?

Authors:  Jennifer C Tang; William A Marston; Robert S Kirsner
Journal:  Wound Repair Regen       Date:  2012-07-16       Impact factor: 3.617

5.  Clinical practice guidelines of the Society for Vascular Surgery (SVS) and the American Venous Forum (AVF)--Management of venous leg ulcers. Introduction.

Authors:  Thomas F O'Donnell; Marc A Passman
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 4.268

6.  Effect of clinical guidelines on medical practice: a systematic review of rigorous evaluations.

Authors:  J M Grimshaw; I T Russell
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1993-11-27       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  The health economic burden that acute and chronic wounds impose on an average clinical commissioning group/health board in the UK.

Authors:  J F Guest; K Vowden; P Vowden
Journal:  J Wound Care       Date:  2017-06-02       Impact factor: 2.072

8.  Management of Patients With Venous Leg Ulcers: Challenges and Current Best Practice.

Authors:  Peter J Franks; Judith Barker; Mark Collier; Georgina Gethin; Emily Haesler; Arkadiusz Jawien; Severin Laeuchli; Giovanni Mosti; Sebastian Probst; Carolina Weller
Journal:  J Wound Care       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 2.072

9.  Venous leg ulcer management in clinical practice in the UK: costs and outcomes.

Authors:  Julian F Guest; Graham W Fuller; Peter Vowden
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2017-12-15       Impact factor: 3.315

10.  Management of venous leg ulcers in general practice - a practical guideline.

Authors:  Sankar Sinha; Sadhishaan Sreedharan
Journal:  Aust Fam Physician       Date:  2014-09
View more
  6 in total

1.  Corrigendum.

Authors: 
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2019-07-11       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 2.  ABPI reporting and compression recommendations in global clinical practice guidelines on venous leg ulcer management: A scoping review.

Authors:  Carolina D Weller; Victoria Team; John D Ivory; Kimberley Crawford; Georgina Gethin
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2018-11-28       Impact factor: 3.315

3.  Health literacy in people with venous leg ulcers: a protocol for scoping review.

Authors:  C D Weller; Victoria Team; Sebastian Probst; Georgina Gethin; Catelyn Richards; Jane Sixsmith; Louise Turnour; Ayoub Bouguettaya
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Prevalence and incidence of venous leg ulcers-a protocol for a systematic review.

Authors:  S Probst; C D Weller; P Bobbink; C Saini; M Pugliese; Monika Buehrer Skinner; G Gethin
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2021-05-12

5.  Patient Explanation of Adherence and Non-Adherence to Venous Leg Ulcer Treatment: A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Carolina D Weller; Catelyn Richards; Louise Turnour; Victoria Team
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2021-06-03       Impact factor: 5.810

6.  Wounds in chronic leg oedema.

Authors:  Ewa Anna Burian; Tonny Karlsmark; Susan Nørregaard; Klaus Kirketerp-Møller; Robert Scott Kirsner; Peter John Franks; Isabelle Quéré; Christine Joy Moffatt
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2021-07-13       Impact factor: 3.315

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.