Literature DB >> 34258856

Wounds in chronic leg oedema.

Ewa Anna Burian1, Tonny Karlsmark1, Susan Nørregaard1, Klaus Kirketerp-Møller1, Robert Scott Kirsner2, Peter John Franks3, Isabelle Quéré4, Christine Joy Moffatt1,3,5.   

Abstract

Wounds and chronic oedema are common disorders, but rarely studied together. The objective of this cross-sectional study was to investigate the point-prevalence and risk factors of wounds on the leg, in chronic leg oedema. Forty sites in nine countries were included. Of 7077 patients with chronic leg oedema, 12.70% had wounds. Independent risk factors were: peripheral arterial disease (odds ratio (OR) 4.87, 95% confidence intervals (CI) 3.63-6.52), cellulitis within the past 12 months (OR 2.69, 95% CI 2.25-3.21), secondary lymphoedema (OR 2.64, 95% CI 1.93-3.60), being male (OR 2.08, 95% CI 1.78-2.44), being over 85 years of age (OR 1.80, 95% CI 1.23-2.62), underweight (OR 1.79, 95% CI 1.14-2.79), bed bound (OR 1.79, 95% CI 1.01-3.16), chair bound (OR 1.52, 95% CI 1.18-1.97), diabetes (OR 1.47, 95% CI 1.23-1.77), and walking with aid (OR 1·41, 95% CI 1.17-1.69). 43.22% of those with wounds had clinically defined well-controlled oedema, associated with a significantly lower risk of wounds (OR 0.50, 95% CI 0.42-0.58, P < .001). Hard/fibrotic tissue (OR 1.71, 95% CI 1.19-2.48), and a positive Stemmers sign (OR 1.57, 95% CI 1.05-2.35) were associated with wounds. The study reinforces the importance of measures to control oedema, as controlled swelling was associated with a 50% lower risk of wounds.
© 2021 The Authors. International Wound Journal published by Medicalhelplines.com Inc (3M) and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  LIMPRINT; chronic oedema; leg ulcers; lymphoedema; wounds and injuries

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34258856      PMCID: PMC8762561          DOI: 10.1111/iwj.13642

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Wound J        ISSN: 1742-4801            Impact factor:   3.315


INTRODUCTION

Hippocrates recognised wounds on the legs were problematic ‘In the case of an ulcer, it is not expedient to stand; more especially if the ulcer be situated in the leg’. He stated that treatment of the wound and swelling were both important. Hippocrates's observations apply today; as the majority of problematic wounds occur on the legs, but also due to the negative impact of oedema on wounds. The gold standard for the prevention and treatment of venous ulcers (VLU) is compression , , , with less attention on chronic oedema and mechanisms leading to wounds, outside the spectrum of venous oedema. Although factors affecting wound healing have been extensively reviewed, , , there is little insight around oedema as a risk factor. None of these reviews stated oedema was associated with delayed wound healing. The burden of chronic wounds cannot be overestimated, with a lifetime risk of 1% to 2% and high expectation of recurrence. VLU are the commonest leg ulcer, with a recurrence rate of 55% within 12 months in community and hospitalised cases, a significant reason being lack of compression causing uncontrolled oedema. Whilst the impact on patients, families, and society is immeasurable , and treatment consumes 1% to 3% of the total health care budget in developed countries, the true burden of chronic oedema has yet to be evaluated. Chronic oedema, defined as oedema present longer than 3 months, is often multi‐factorial, for example, due to primary and secondary lymphoedema; venous insufficiency, cancer, obesity, and immobility. The estimated prevalence of chronic oedema is 57% in patients cared for by community nurses in the UK and 38% in hospitals in Europe. Complications associated with chronic oedema include cellulitis and chronic wounds. Despite this, chronic oedema remains a neglected condition. This international cross‐sectional study aimed to examine the association of potential risk factors for patients with chronic leg oedema and a concurrent wound (acute or chronic). Identification of potential risk factors for such patients allows for targeted health interventions and assists in understanding the mechanisms of wound formation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study design

An international, cross‐sectional, multicentre study performed as a sub‐study of the LIMPRINT ‐project; a study designed to prospectively determine the scope and impact of chronic oedema within health services. Centres from nine countries participated between June 2014 and August 2017, including hospital (in/outpatients) and community cases.

Ethical approval

Each country and centre acquired necessary approvals from the Ethical Review Committee and other committees.

Study population

Adults 18 years and older, with clinically confirmed chronic leg oedema, irrespective of the cause (unilateral or bilateral), able to understand the study and give informed consent where required by local research and service development committees were included. Patients were excluded if they were unwilling to participate, receiving end‐of‐life care or if judged as not in the patient's best interest by the investigator.

Outcomes

The presence of clinically assessed leg wounds (yes/no) in the sites affected by chronic leg oedema, and its relation to potential risk factors.

Definitions

Chronic leg oedema: Defined as oedema, which has endured longer than 3 months. The term lymphoedema has been used to describe oedema resulting from a failure of the lymphatics, due to lymphatic malformation, cancer, mechanical injury, filariasis, etc. However, newer research indicates the significant role of the lymphatic system in all chronic oedema, and thereby the introduction of this umbrella term was accepted. Chronic oedema is often multifactorial and includes different pathologies, for example, primary lymphoedema (‘congenital’) and secondary causes, that include venous insufficiency, cancer, heart failure, immobility, and obesity. Oedema was confirmed in all cases by the ‘Pitting Oedema Test ’ and/or the Stemmers sign. The presence of either pitting or a positive Stemmers sign was confirmatory of chronic oedema (in longstanding and severe oedema, fibrotic tissue develops with no pitting). The duration was determined from the patient and clinician, and confirmed by review of medical records. Wounds: An umbrella term that we broadly defined as ‘loss of skin integrity’, irrespective of the duration, wound characteristics, or aetiology (internal or external). It was clinically assessed by the investigator at the time‐point of examination, supported by information from medical records, imaging, and other investigations. The wound was classified as either foot/leg ulcer, pressure ulcer, surgical wound, or other. Only wounds on the legs were included in this analysis. Sites with the expertise further classified foot/leg ulcers as venous, arterial, venous–arterial (mixed), diabetic (including neuropathic and neuro‐ischemic), or other. The duration and size of the wounds were documented.

Data collection and quality assessment

The validation of the methodology has previously been published. A core tool developed by an international expert panel including a questionnaire and a clinical examination was used by all participants. Data were collected by trained health care professionals. Sites collecting additional wound data were assisted by wound care specialists. An additional tool was also used in centres able to undertake the staging procedure of the severity of oedema (ISL; International Society of Lymphology). Lymphoedema specialists assisted in the classification. All centres followed the study protocol and complied with standard operating procedures to ensure quality control. In lymphoedema specialist centres, data using the core tool were obtained from clinical records of all subjects currently attending nine specific specialist lymphoedema services.

Variables

Variables are listed in Table 1. Site of chronic oedema was recorded using a body map. The oedema was classified as primary/congenital or secondary/acquired lymphoedema, and whether related to cancer due to treatment and/or metastasis. Oedema factors were venous disease, obesity, immobility, filariasis, and/or other (multiple options were possible). Duration of oedema and mobility status was collected. In selected centres, the severity of oedema was assessed, with the ISL‐staging tool, by palpation and clinical evaluation, initially developed for lymphoedema.¶
TABLE 1

Dependent and independent variables in the study

Dependent variableIndependent variable
Presence of wound(s) on the lower limbAge
Sex
Body mass index
Concomitant diseases
Cellulitis within 12 months
Classification of chronic oedema
Aetiology of oedema
ISL scale
Duration of leg oedema
Mobility
Control of swelling
Pitting oedema
Tissue quality
Stemmers sign
Dependent and independent variables in the study There are no internationally agreed definitions of control of swelling. Here it was a subjective judgement by the investigator based on the clinical evaluation of the leg, clarified with the caregiver and if necessary the lead clinician, assessed as either present, absent or ‘do not know’, at the time of clinical assessment. The type (or absence) of treatment was noted, including the use of compression. Data were collected on demography and relevant comorbidities. Body mass index (BMI) was estimated according to WHO classifications as either underweight (BMI < 20), normal weight (BMI 20‐30), obese (BMI 30‐40), or morbidly obese (BMI > 40). Cellulitis defined as an acute onset of soft‐tissue erythema, warmth, and tenderness that rapidly resolved with antibiotics within the last year was confirmed by a combination of physical examination, interview with the patient, and/or review of medical records.

Statistical analysis

Statistics were prepared using Stata 12 (Statacorp, Texas). No formal sample size determination was performed. A cohort of over 5000 patients was expected to show the major factors associated with wounds. The principal analysis examined the binary outcome (wounds versus no wounds). Factors tested for an association with the outcome were broadly demographics, medical history and data about the limb. These variables were chosen as they were believed to be potentially associated with the outcome and could be reliably collected in an international study. Logistic regression was the primary analysis. Univariate comparisons were followed by a multivariable model, using a stepwise elimination process until all factors remaining had an alpha <.05. Results were presented as OR and 95% confidence intervals. A further similar analysis examined the severity of chronic oedema in a subgroup of 738 patients. Missing data were not imputed and therefore remained missing.

RESULTS

Characteristics of countries, centres, and patients

Of 10 127 patients with chronic oedema in the LIMPRINT database, 1727 (17.05%) had a wound anywhere on the body. Seven thousand and seventy‐seven (69.88%) patients had swelling of one or both legs; these were included in this analysis. Forty centres participated from Australia, Canada, Denmark, France, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Turkey, and United Kingdom, Table 2. These included specialist lymphoedema services (n = 14 centres), out‐patient acute hospitals (10), hospitalised cases (seven), community nursing services (three), elderly care residential homes (one), nursing homes (one), and other (four). Six thousand one hundred and seventy‐eight patients with leg oedema but no wound comprised the comparison group. Patient characteristics are presented in Table 3.
TABLE 2

Percentage of patients with leg oedema and a wound (n = 7077)

Total patientsLeg woundPercent
UK45073638.05
Denmark81827833.99
Turkey21594.19
Japan4312.33
Canada672638.81
France313268.31
Australia936974.19
Italy100212011.98
Ireland19736.84
Total 7077 899 12.70
TABLE 3

Demographics of patients with chronic leg oedema (n = 7077)

Characteristic(s)Number of patients (%)
Age, mean64.91 (SD = 16.38)
Missing 2
Female5007 (70.75)
Missing 0
Body weight
Underweight143 (2.03)
Normal weight2922 (41.39)
Obesity2505 (35.48)
Morbidly obesity1490 (21.10)
Missing 17
Concomitant disease
Diabetes1304 (18.43)
Missing 0
Heart failure/ ischemic heart disease1111 (15.70)
Missing 0
Peripheral arterial disease246 (3.48)
Missing 0
Neurological disease614 (8.70)
Missing 19
Facility
Hospital‐based cases6643 (93.87)
Community cases110 (1.55)
Other324 (4.58)
Missing 0
Wound type (n = 899)
Foot/leg ulcer (unspecified)627 (70.06)
Diabetic37 (4.13)
Pressure ulcer100 (11.17)
Venous103 (11.51)
Arterial13 (1.45)
Mixed23 (2.57)
Traumatic9 (1.01)
Surgical16 (1.79)
Other1
Missing 4
Wound duration (n = 179)
<1 wk23 (13.29)
1–2 wk27 (15.61)
2–4 wk23 (13.29)
4–6 wk35 (20.23)
6 wk to <3 mo41 (23.70)
>3 mo24 (13.87)
Missing 6
Wound area (n = 179)
Small; <10 cm2 115 (64.61)
Medium; >10 cm2 ‐ < 25 cm2 42 (23.60)
Large; > 25 cm2 21 (11.80)
Missing 1
Classification of chronic oedema
Primary lymphoedema1376 (19.61)
Secondary lymphoedema5642 (80.39)
Missing 59
Related to cancer or its treatment934 (16.62)
Non‐cancer4686 (83.38)
Missing 22
Venous disease2315 (49.49)
Immobility1708 (36.51)
Obesity1416 (30.27)
Filariasis10 (0.21)
Missing 8
Unilateral leg oedema1728 (24.42)
Bilateral leg oedema5349 (75.58)
Missing 0
ISL scale a (n = 738)
I184 (24.97)
II397 (53.87)
III156 (21.17)
Missing 1
Duration of leg oedema
3 mo to <1 y742 (10.51)
1–2 y706 (10.00)
2–5 y1469 (20.80)
>5–10 y1598 (22.62)
>10 y2548 (36.08)
Missing 14
Mobility
Normal4011 (56.75)
Walking aid2325 (32.89)
Chair bound639 (9.04)
Bedbound93 (1.32)
Missing 9
Treatment with compression therapy (n = 7077)
Compression garment4892 (69.37)
Multilayer bandage1744 (24.73)
Compression wrap631 (8.95)
At least one of the above5553 (78.74)
No compression1499 (21.26)
Missing 25
Good control of swelling4135 (62.71)
Missing b 483
Antibiotics413 (5.86)
Missing 25

The ISL scale has the following: stage I: early onset of the condition, with a collection of tissue oedema that decreases with limb elevation. The oedema may be pitting; stage II: limb elevation alone rarely reduces swelling and pitting is manifested; stage III: the tissue is fibrotic (hard) and pitting is absent. Skin changes such as thickening, hyperpigmentation, increased skin folds, fat deposits, and warty overgrowths develop.

Includes cases were the control of swelling was judged as ‘uncertain’ by the investigator.

Percentage of patients with leg oedema and a wound (n = 7077) Demographics of patients with chronic leg oedema (n = 7077) The ISL scale has the following: stage I: early onset of the condition, with a collection of tissue oedema that decreases with limb elevation. The oedema may be pitting; stage II: limb elevation alone rarely reduces swelling and pitting is manifested; stage III: the tissue is fibrotic (hard) and pitting is absent. Skin changes such as thickening, hyperpigmentation, increased skin folds, fat deposits, and warty overgrowths develop. Includes cases were the control of swelling was judged as ‘uncertain’ by the investigator.

Frequency of wounds in patients with chronic leg oedema

12.70% (n = 899) of the patients had a concurrent wound with a wide range of wound duration and size, classified as: 627 ft/leg ulcers (aetiology not defined), 103 VLU, 100 pressure ulcers, the rest being arterial, mixed ulcers, diabetic foot ulcers (DFU), traumatic or surgical wounds. Some had multiple aetiologies. 2315 (49.49%) of those with secondary lymphoedema were reported to have venous insufficiency, which could indicate that many of the wounds identified as foot/leg ulcers on more detailed classification would have been VLU. The frequency of chronic wounds by country ranged between 2.33% in Japan and 74.19% in Australia. In those assessed for the severity of the chronic oedema (n = 738) wounds affected 27.33% with ISL stage I, 38.67% in stage II, and 34.00% in stage III. Only 43.22% of the patient cohort with wounds had well‐controlled chronic leg oedema.

Risk factors by univariate analysis

Statistically significant associations were found between wounds and being male (OR 2.29), diabetes (OR 2.14), heart failure/ischemic heart disease (OR 1.89), and neurological disease (OR 1.33). Increasing age was significantly associated, with the highest odd ratios in those over 85 years (OR 3.87). Although nutritional status was associated, only underweight yielded statistically significant results (OR 2.70). Morbid obesity was not statistically significant (OR 1.19). Levels of mobility were significantly associated: walking with aid (OR 2.19), chair bound (OR 2.39), and bedbound patients (OR 3.63) Table 4.
TABLE 4

Univariate analysis on leg wounds and chronic oedema (n = 7077)

No woundWoundOR 95% CI P‐value
N%N%
Sex
Female451973.1548854.281.00
Male165926.8541145.722.29 (1.99‐2.65)<.001
Age
<45 y84613.70556.121.00
45 to 64 y197832.0223926.611.86 (1.37‐2.52)<.001
65 to 74 y145523.5621223.612.24 (1.65‐3.05)
75 to 84 y131021.2124427.172.87 (2.11‐3.89)
85+ y5889.5214816.483.87 (2.79‐5.37)
Body weight
Normal weight256641.6435639.641.00
Under weight1041.69394.342.70 (1.84‐3.97)<.001
Obese221335.9129232.520.95 (0.81‐1.12)
Morbidly obese127920.7621123.501.19 (0.99‐1.43)
Leg mobility
Walks unaided366059.3135139.131.00
Walks with aid192231.1540344.932.19 (1.88‐2.55)<.001
Chair bound5208.4311913.272.39 (1.90‐3.00)
Bedbound691.12242.683.63 (2.25‐5.85)
Diabetes
Absent514483.2662969.971.00
Present103416.7427030.032.14 (1.82‐2.50)<.001
Heart failure/ischemic heart disease
Absent528585.5568175.751.00
Present89314.4521824.251.89 (1.60‐2.24)<.001
Neurological disease
Absent564991.6279589.131.00
Present5178.389710.871.33 (1.06‐1.68).014
Peripheral arterial disease
Absent605297.9677986.651.00
Present1262.0412013.357.40 (5.70‐9.60)<.001
Cellulitis within 12 mo (n = 7064)
Absent533786.5661168.041.00
Present82913.4428731.963.02 (2.58‐3.54)<.001
Control of swelling (n = 6594)
Absent197334.3848656.781.00
Present376565.6237043.220.40 (0.34‐0.46)<.001
Swelling duration (n = 7063)
<1 y6149.9612814.241·00
1 to 2 y6139.949310.340.73 (0.54‐0.97).002
2 to 5 y128120.7818820.910.70 (0.55‐0.90)
5 to 10 y140122.7319721.910.67 (0.53‐0.86)
>10 y225536.5829332.590.62 (0.50‐0.78)
Classification (n = 7018)
Primary lymphoedema132421.63525.801.00<.001
Secondary lymphoedema479878.3784494.204.48 (3.36‐5.97)
Secondary cause (n = 5620)
Cancer90819.00263.091.00<.001
Non‐cancer387181.0081596.917.35 (4.94‐10.94)
Related to cancer or its treatment (n = 930)
Cancer treatment
Absent12513.83623.081.00
Present77986.172076.920.53 (0.21‐1.36).18
Cancer metastatic
Absent80188.612180.771.00
Present10311.39519.231.85 (0.68‐5.02).22
Non‐cancer (n = 4678)
Venous
Absent209554.1926833.001.00
Present177145.8154467.002.40 (2.05‐2.82)<.001
Immobility
Absent244263.1752865.021.00
Present142436.8328434.980.92 (0.79‐1.08).32
Obesity
Absent270870.0555468.231.00
Present115829.9525831.771.09 (0.93‐1.28).31
Lymphatic filariasis
Absent385899.7981099.75
Present80.2120.25.69
Univariate analysis on leg wounds and chronic oedema (n = 7077) Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) (OR 7.40), cellulitis the last year (OR 3.02), and secondary lymphoedema were significantly associated with wounds compared with primary lymphoedema (OR 4.48). A non‐cancer cause of the oedema was of significant risk (OR 7.35), but specifically oedema classified as due to venous disease (OR 2.40), as opposed to oedema caused by obesity and immobility.** Swelling duration >1 year had a lower risk, with ratios varying between OR 0.62 and 0.73 compared with <1 year. Subjects with control of swelling had a significantly lower risk of wounds (OR 0.40) Table 4.

Independent risk factors

Factors remaining after multivariable analysis were PAD (OR 4.87), cellulitis (OR 2.69), secondary lymphoedema (OR 2.64), being male (OR 2.08), being 85+ years (OR 1.80), underweight (OR 1.79), being bed bound (OR 1.79), chair bound (OR 1.52), diabetes (OR 1.47), and walking with aid (OR 1.41). Patients with controlled swelling had a markedly lower risk of wounds, OR 0.50 (95% CI 0.42‐0.58, P < .001), Table 5.
TABLE 5

Logistic regression analysis: independent factors associated with leg wounds and oedema (n = 6503)

Odds ratioOR 95% CI P‐value
Sex
Male2.081.78 to 2.44<.001
Age
45 to 64 y1.130.81 to 1.57
65 to 74 y1.130.80 to 1.59.003
75 to 84 y1.400.99 to 1.97
85+ y1.801.23 to 2.62
Mobility
Walks with aid1.411.17 to 1.69
Chair bound1.521.18 to 1.97.003
Bed bound1.791.01 to 3.16
Body weight
Underweight1.791.14 to 2.79
Obese0.840.70 to 1.02.007
Morbidly obese1.030.83 to 1.28
Diabetes
Present1.471.23 to 1.77<.001
Peripheral arterial disease
Present4.873.63 to 6.52<.001
Control of swelling
Present0.500.42 to 0.58<.001
Cellulitis within 12 mo
Present2.692.25 to 3.21<.001
Secondary lymphoedema
Present2.641.93 to 3.60<.001
Logistic regression analysis: independent factors associated with leg wounds and oedema (n = 6503)

Severity of oedema, a sub‐group analysis

The risk of a wound was significantly increased in cases with hard/fibrotic tissue (OR 1.71) and positive Stemmers sign (OR 1.57), in patients assessed for the severity of oedema (n = 738, Table 6). The relationship regarding the ISL‐scale was complex. On univariate analysis, a lower risk of wounds was seen in stage II (OR 0.60) but increased in stage III (OR 1.69). However, after adjustment for sex, age, mobility, diabetes, PAD, control of oedema, cellulitis, and secondary lymphoedema, none remained statistically significant, albeit with a tendency of an increased risk in stage III (OR 1.75, 95% CI 0.95‐3.24).
TABLE 6

Wounds and leg swelling: lymphoedema factors (n = 738)

No woundWoundOR 95% CI P‐value
N%N%
Pitting
Non pitting19633.333926.001.00
Pitting39266.6711174.01.42 (0.95‐2.13).085
Tissue quality
Soft41069.738657.331.00
Hard17830.276442.671.71 (1.19‐2.48).004
Stemmers sign
Negative23139.974129.711.00
Positive34760.039770.291.57 (1.05‐2.35).026
ISL scale a
Stage I14324.364127.331.00
Stage II33957.755838.670.60 (0.38‐0.93)<.001
Stage III10517.895134.001.69 (1.05‐2.74)
ISL scale after adjustment for sex, age, mobility, diabetes, peripheral arterial disease, control of swelling, cellulitis, secondary lymphoedema
Stage I1.00
Stage II0.73 (0.43‐1.23).087
Stage III1.75 (0.95‐3.24)

The ISL scale has the following: stage I: early onset of the condition, with a collection of tissue oedema that decreases with limb elevation. The oedema may be pitting; stage II: limb elevation alone rarely reduces swelling and pitting is manifested; stage III: the tissue is fibrotic (hard) and pitting is absent. Skin changes such as thickening, hyperpigmentation, increased skin folds, fat deposits, and warty overgrowths develop.

Wounds and leg swelling: lymphoedema factors (n = 738) The ISL scale has the following: stage I: early onset of the condition, with a collection of tissue oedema that decreases with limb elevation. The oedema may be pitting; stage II: limb elevation alone rarely reduces swelling and pitting is manifested; stage III: the tissue is fibrotic (hard) and pitting is absent. Skin changes such as thickening, hyperpigmentation, increased skin folds, fat deposits, and warty overgrowths develop.

DISCUSSION

In this study, the frequency of leg wounds of diverse aetiology in chronic leg oedema was common, with a point‐prevalence of 12.70%. Independent risk factors for wounds included PAD, diabetes, being male, cellulitis, secondary lymphoedema, being over 85 years old, underweight and reduced mobility. Our findings add to the growing evidence that well‐controlled oedema is crucial; associated with a 50% lower risk of wounds (P < .001). This should not be surprising, as compression is gold standard with a high level of evidence for treatment and prevention of VLU. , , , Yet, only 43% of the patients with wounds had well‐controlled oedema. Assessment of risk factors has been a topic of research, mostly for VLU, , , , , , DFU , , and pressure ulcers, but this is the first international study in chronic oedema. Inclusion of diverse types of leg wounds sheds new light on the topic. The large cohort, and the clinical confirmation of both chronic oedema and wounds, strengthens the validity of our data. We confirm the anecdotal observation that secondary lymphoedema has a higher association with wounds than primary lymphoedema. This may indicate that other factors contribute to the wound, or that the oedema has different biological properties or localization in the tissue. Oedema seems primarily confined to the subepidermis in lipodermatosclerosis (venous insufficiency), lower in the dermis in lymphoedema, and involves the deep dermis/subcutis in heart failure. This might explain some of the different clinical manifestations; in lipodermatosclerosis brownish fibrotic tissue with ulcers is often seen, as opposed to epidermal hyperproliferation, warty skin, and fewer wounds in lymphoedema. Heart failure rarely causes major skin changes, except from soft pitting oedema. It is suggested that the oedema in fibrotic lipodermatoslerosis causes a localised increased skin tension leading to ulceration, opposed to the more freely distributed fluid in lymphoedema and heart failure. , Hard/fibrotic tissue, as manifested in advanced stages of chronic oedema, was a risk factor in our study, supported by others reporting lipodermatosclerosis associated with VLU recurrence. Interventions to prevent progression into severe stages of chronic oedema should be mandatory. Whether increased levels of cytokines, growth factors, or lipids in lymphatic fluid in lymphoedema (possibly driving adipogenesis) have a protective role for wounds is yet to be determined. PAD was the strongest risk factor for wounds, underlining the importance of vascular evaluation. As oxygen is critical for wound healing, it is logical that hypoxia caused by PAD is harmful. High oxygen consumption by metabolically active cells such as inflammatory cells depletes the wound from oxygen. , Due to pain, patients with severe limb ischemia often sleep with dependent legs, aggravating oedema. Cyclic intervals of ischemia and reperfusion induce a proinflammatory state, by increasing neutrophil flood into the tissue, causing cell damage. Repeated ischemia–reperfusion cycles seem to be worse for wound healing than prolonged phases of single ischemia. The mechanisms causing oedema in diabetes are complex. The risk of wounds is correlated to the duration of diabetes and complications such as neuropathy and PAD, with a risk of complex wounds and secondary infection. Up to 38% of the patients with DFU have oedema, being more frequent in those who require amputation. Renal disease and congestive heart failure in diabetes, antidiabetic drugs, and autonomic dysfunction may predispose oedema formation. Whilst off‐loading is mandatory for foot ulcers, compression therapy in PAD and diabetes is a subject of intense debate because of the fear of compromising the circulation, and causing pressure wounds in neuropathy. , However, intact and even improved microperfusion locally and distally by compression has been measured. , , The safety in moderate PAD is supported by a prospective study (n = 94) and a RCT (n = 80) in diabetics and PAD. We found that being male had a greater association with wounds than diabetes. Male predominance has been reported in chronic wounds, VLU, , and DFU. , Yet, contradictory results for VLU have been reported , and sex was not a risk factor in pressure ulcers. Male predominance may be due to biological , and behavioural factors. The negative impact of being aged and inactive was significant; the older and less mobile being at greatest risk. Similar results on immobility have been reported for VLU and chronic wounds. This is complex and can reflect poor general health, worsened oedema, or increased tendency of pressure ulcers. Regular walking (≥5 d/wk) has been found to be an independent protective factor from VLU (OR 0.26, 95% CI 0.08‐0.90). Being underweight was also associated with wounds. Studies have contradictory findings regarding obesity, perhaps due to the wound type , and we did not find an independent association. The growing evidence of the connection between obesity and lymphoedema is worthy of further investigations. Our results regarding ISL staging and the relationship to wounds are difficult to interpret, but suggest that advanced stages of chronic oedema with fibrotic tissue (ISL stage III) may be associated with wounds. Whilst the ISL scale might be useful, we acknowledge that the classification can be difficult in people with ISL stage II as they may have pitting and fibrosis on different anatomical parts of the limb at the same time point. The complex relationship with wounds in the ISL scoring may reflect the influence of important confounders (as indicated by the multivariable analysis). Why is chronic oedema associated with wounds? Many controversies surround our understanding of the mechanisms of wounds in chronic oedema, with most research focusing on venous ulceration. In VLU, venous hypertension injures endothelial cells, causing release of inflammatory molecules, prothrombotic precursors, and leakage of fluid into the interstitial space, presenting as oedema. Migration of inflammatory cells into the tissue is seen, setting up an inflammatory cascade with production of cytokines and matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), leading to degradation of extracellular matrix, ulceration, and fibrosis. Difficult‐to‐eradicate bacterial biofilms, inevitable in chronic wounds, attract leucocytes, maintaining the inflammation. Others hypothesise that oedema primarily interferes with oxygen and nutrient exchange in the skin. A decrease in the number of capillaries and a decline in the skin oxygen content (tcPO2) is correlated with the severity of venous insufficiency, possibly leading to ulceration. Compression seems to improve both inflammation and microvascularity, lowering venous hypertension, decreasing capillary filtration, and increasing lymphatic drainage. Decreased expression of pro‐inflammatory cytokines has been measured in lymphoedema and in VLU, respectively, , , with a reduction of MMPs, and increased capillary density and tcPO2. Venous eczema, and sometimes fibrosis, can be reversed. , The risk of cellulitis (strongly associated with wounds in this study) can also be prevented by compression. The proposed mechanisms and its relation to our findings can be seen in Figure 1.
FIGURE 1

Simplified hypothesis linking chronic oedema with wounds. Wounds and oedema are known to go hand in hand; wounds can cause oedema by inflammation, but oedema can also predispose to wounds, through several possible mechanisms. Other internal and external factors, for example, trauma, also influence the development of a wound. Figure created with BioRender.com

Simplified hypothesis linking chronic oedema with wounds. Wounds and oedema are known to go hand in hand; wounds can cause oedema by inflammation, but oedema can also predispose to wounds, through several possible mechanisms. Other internal and external factors, for example, trauma, also influence the development of a wound. Figure created with BioRender.com Limitations to our study must be noted. Despite training using agreed wound classification and access to specialist teams, variation in correctly defining the wound type in a large international study may have occurred. Secondly, wounds of diverse aetiology were included, introducing complex interactions. Thirdly, the assessment of ‘well‐controlled’ oedema was a matter of a subjective assessment. Fourthly, it is acknowledged that many other clinical, psychological, and social factors may influence why wounds occur in this population which lie outside the scope of this study. Fifthly, a generalisation of our results should be made cautiously as the majority of cases were included from hospitals skewing data towards more severe cases, with selection bias. The wide range of wound prevalence in different countries is probably explained by the different types of services patients were recruited from (eg, wound centre vs lymphoedema clinic). Lastly, a cross‐sectional design does not allow for firm views on causation to be formed. In conclusion, our study highlights the global challenge of chronic leg oedema and wounds. The development of leg wounds in chronic leg oedema is frequent and multifactorial. Although multiple guidelines support the usage of compression therapy to prevent and treat wounds, only 43% had well‐controlled oedema. For some, it may be tempting only to apply a dressing on the wound, rather than treating the underlying cause. In this study, those with well‐controlled oedema reduced their risk of a concurrent wound by half. The important association between different wound types, chronic oedema, and compression is worthy of further studies.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

No support was received from any organisation for the submitted work during the conduct of the study, except for PJF from ILF. Reponex Pharmaceuticals and Coloplast sponsors EAB in her PhD, who has also been an investigator for clinical research for Genentech, Reapplix, Ilkos therapeutic, and SoftOx Solutions, through payments to the department, outside the submitted work. CJM is sponsored by Thuasne and Essity Healthcare for consulting in compression therapy, and by ILF for work on different research, outside the submitted work. SN is sponsored by ILF for work on projects outside the submitted work. KKM receives personal fees from SoftOx Solutions as medical advisor and minor shareholder, outside the submitted work and holds a patent, acetic acid against biofilm infections, issued to SoftOx Solutions. RK has no conflicts related to this work. TK is sponsored by Coloplast regarding stomas and wound healing as part of an advisory board membership, has been an investigator for clinical research for Genentech, and is a medical advisor for Reponex Pharmaceuticals, outside the submitted work. PJF has received grants from Tactile Medical, outside the submitted work. IQ has received honoraria for consulting and as a speaker from Thuasne in the last 3 years and was an investigator for clinical research for Thuasne and Medi, fees were paid to the hospital. No other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.
  54 in total

Review 1.  Sex steroids and cutaneous wound healing: the contrasting influences of estrogens and androgens.

Authors:  S C Gilliver; G S Ashcroft
Journal:  Climacteric       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.005

2.  The impact of malnutrition and nutrition-related factors on the development and severity of pressure ulcers in older patients receiving home care.

Authors:  Shinji Iizaka; Mayumi Okuwa; Junko Sugama; Hiromi Sanada
Journal:  Clin Nutr       Date:  2009-06-28       Impact factor: 7.324

3.  Control of lower extremity edema in patients with diabetes: Double blind randomized controlled trial assessing the efficacy of mild compression diabetic socks.

Authors:  Stephanie C Wu; Ryan T Crews; Melissa Skratsky; Julia Overstreet; Sai V Yalla; Michelle Winder; Jacquelyn Ortiz; Charles A Andersen
Journal:  Diabetes Res Clin Pract       Date:  2017-02-27       Impact factor: 5.602

Review 4.  Microcirculatory dysfunction in chronic venous insufficiency (CVI).

Authors:  M Jünger; A Steins; M Hahn; H M Häfner
Journal:  Microcirculation       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.628

5.  Macro- and microperfusion during application of a new compression system, designed for patients with leg ulcer and concomitant peripheral arterial occlusive disease.

Authors:  Michael Jünger; Hermann Haase; Linda Schwenke; Jens Bichel; Jan Schuren; Andrea Ladwig
Journal:  Clin Hemorheol Microcirc       Date:  2013-01-01       Impact factor: 2.375

Review 6.  Pathophysiology of Chronic Venous Disease and Venous Ulcers.

Authors:  Joseph D Raffetto
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  2018-01-05       Impact factor: 2.741

7.  Socio-economic impact of chronic venous insufficiency. An underestimated public health problem.

Authors:  R Van den Oever; B Hepp; B Debbaut; I Simon
Journal:  Int Angiol       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 2.789

8.  Safety of medical compression stockings in patients with diabetes mellitus or peripheral arterial disease.

Authors:  Ulrich Rother; Anna Grussler; Colin Griesbach; Veronika Almasi-Sperling; Werner Lang; Alexander Meyer
Journal:  BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care       Date:  2020-06

9.  Prevalence and risk factors of chronic wounds in nursing homes in Germany: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Kathrin Raeder; Deborah Elisabeth Jachan; Ursula Müller-Werdan; Nils Axel Lahmann
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2020-08-19       Impact factor: 3.315

10.  Wounds in chronic leg oedema.

Authors:  Ewa Anna Burian; Tonny Karlsmark; Susan Nørregaard; Klaus Kirketerp-Møller; Robert Scott Kirsner; Peter John Franks; Isabelle Quéré; Christine Joy Moffatt
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2021-07-13       Impact factor: 3.315

View more
  2 in total

1.  [Preoperative screening for risk factors].

Authors:  Matthias Meyer; Joachim Grifka; Tobias Kappenschneider
Journal:  Orthopadie (Heidelb)       Date:  2022-05-25

2.  Wounds in chronic leg oedema.

Authors:  Ewa Anna Burian; Tonny Karlsmark; Susan Nørregaard; Klaus Kirketerp-Møller; Robert Scott Kirsner; Peter John Franks; Isabelle Quéré; Christine Joy Moffatt
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2021-07-13       Impact factor: 3.315

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.