J F Guest1, K Vowden2, P Vowden3. 1. Director of Catalyst, Visiting Professor of Health Economics, Catalyst Health Economics Consultants, Northwood, Middlesex, UK; Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College, London, UK. 2. Nurse Consultant, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust and University of Bradford, Bradford, UK. 3. Consultant Vascular Surgeon, Professor of Wound Healing Research, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust and University of Bradford, Bradford, UK.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To estimate the patterns of care and related resource use attributable to managing acute and chronic wounds among a catchment population of a typical clinical commissioning group (CCG)/health board and corresponding National Health Service (NHS) costs in the UK. METHOD: This was a sub-analysis of a retrospective cohort analysis of the records of 2000 patients in The Health Improvement Network (THIN) database. Patients' characteristics, wound-related health outcomes and health-care resource use were quantified for an average CCG/health board with a catchment population of 250,000 adults ≥18 years of age, and the corresponding NHS cost of patient management was estimated at 2013/2014 prices. RESULTS: An average CCG/health board was estimated to be managing 11,200 wounds in 2012/2013. Of these, 40% were considered to be acute wounds, 48% chronic and 12% lacking any specific diagnosis. The prevalence of acute, chronic and unspecified wounds was estimated to be growing at the rate of 9%, 12% and 13% per annum respectively. Our analysis indicated that the current rate of wound healing must increase by an average of at least 1% per annum across all wound types in order to slow down the increasing prevalence. Otherwise, an average CCG/health board is predicted to manage ~23,200 wounds per annum by 2019/2020 and is predicted to spend a discounted (the process of determining the present value of a payment that is to be received in the future) £50 million on managing these wounds and associated comorbidities. CONCLUSION: Real-world evidence highlights the substantial burden that acute and chronic wounds impose on an average CCG/health board. Strategies are required to improve the accuracy of diagnosis and healing rates.
OBJECTIVE: To estimate the patterns of care and related resource use attributable to managing acute and chronic wounds among a catchment population of a typical clinical commissioning group (CCG)/health board and corresponding National Health Service (NHS) costs in the UK. METHOD: This was a sub-analysis of a retrospective cohort analysis of the records of 2000 patients in The Health Improvement Network (THIN) database. Patients' characteristics, wound-related health outcomes and health-care resource use were quantified for an average CCG/health board with a catchment population of 250,000 adults ≥18 years of age, and the corresponding NHS cost of patient management was estimated at 2013/2014 prices. RESULTS: An average CCG/health board was estimated to be managing 11,200 wounds in 2012/2013. Of these, 40% were considered to be acute wounds, 48% chronic and 12% lacking any specific diagnosis. The prevalence of acute, chronic and unspecified wounds was estimated to be growing at the rate of 9%, 12% and 13% per annum respectively. Our analysis indicated that the current rate of wound healing must increase by an average of at least 1% per annum across all wound types in order to slow down the increasing prevalence. Otherwise, an average CCG/health board is predicted to manage ~23,200 wounds per annum by 2019/2020 and is predicted to spend a discounted (the process of determining the present value of a payment that is to be received in the future) £50 million on managing these wounds and associated comorbidities. CONCLUSION: Real-world evidence highlights the substantial burden that acute and chronic wounds impose on an average CCG/health board. Strategies are required to improve the accuracy of diagnosis and healing rates.
Entities:
Keywords:
burden; clinical commissioning group; cost; health board; ulcers; wounds
Authors: Carolina D Weller; Victoria Team; John D Ivory; Kimberley Crawford; Georgina Gethin Journal: Int Wound J Date: 2018-11-28 Impact factor: 3.315
Authors: Maxim Privalov; Nils Beisemann; Jan El Barbari; Eric Mandelka; Michael Müller; Hannah Syrek; Paul Alfred Grützner; Sven Yves Vetter Journal: J Digit Imaging Date: 2021-07-29 Impact factor: 4.903