Literature DB >> 22364054

Reliability of Doppler and stethoscope methods of determining systolic blood pressures: considerations for calculating an ankle-brachial index.

Steven B Chesbro1, Elmira T Asongwed, Jamesha Brown, Emmanuel B John.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purposes of this study were to: (1) identify the interrater and intrarater reliability of systolic blood pressures using a stethoscope and Doppler to determine an ankle-brachial index (ABI), and (2) to determine the correlation between the 2 methods.
BACKGROUND: Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) affects approximately 8 to 12 million people in the United States, and nearly half of those with this disease are asymptomatic. Early detection and prompt treatment of PAD will improve health outcomes. It is important that clinicians perform tests that determine the presence of PAD.
METHOD: Two individual raters trained in ABI procedure measured the systolic blood pressures of 20 individuals' upper and lower extremities. Standard ABI measurement protocols were observed. Raters individually recorded the systolic blood pressures of each extremity using a stethoscope and a Doppler, for a total of 640 independent measures.
RESULTS: Interrater reliability of Doppler measurements to determine SBP at the ankle was very strong (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC], 0.93-0.99) compared to moderate to strong reliability using a stethoscope (ICC, 0.64-0.87). Agreement between the 2 devices to determine SBP was moderate to very weak (ICC, 0.13-0.61). Comparisons of the use of Doppler and stethoscope to determine ABI showed weak to very weak intrarater correlation (ICC, 0.17-0.35). Linear regression analysis of the 2 methods to determine ABI showed positive but weak to very weak correlations (r2 = .013, P = .184).
CONCLUSIONS: A Doppler ultrasound is recommended over a stethoscope for accuracy in systolic pressure readings for ABI measurements.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22364054     DOI: 10.1016/s0027-9684(15)30441-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc        ISSN: 0027-9684            Impact factor:   1.798


  3 in total

Review 1.  ABPI reporting and compression recommendations in global clinical practice guidelines on venous leg ulcer management: A scoping review.

Authors:  Carolina D Weller; Victoria Team; John D Ivory; Kimberley Crawford; Georgina Gethin
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2018-11-28       Impact factor: 3.315

2.  Peripheral arterial disease screening and diagnostic practice: A scoping review.

Authors:  Cornelius M Donohue; Joseph V Adler; Laura L Bolton
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2019-11-03       Impact factor: 3.315

3.  The reliability of the ankle brachial index: a systematic review.

Authors:  Sarah Casey; Sean Lanting; Christopher Oldmeadow; Vivienne Chuter
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2019-08-02       Impact factor: 2.303

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.