Literature DB >> 30424999

Diagnostic Accuracy of CT for Prediction of Bladder Cancer Treatment Response with and without Computerized Decision Support.

Kenny H Cha1, Lubomir M Hadjiiski2, Richard H Cohan2, Heang-Ping Chan2, Elaine M Caoili2, Matthew S Davenport3, Ravi K Samala2, Alon Z Weizer4, Ajjai Alva5, Galina Kirova-Nedyalkova6, Kimberly Shampain2, Nathaniel Meyer2, Daniel Barkmeier2, Sean Woolen2, Prasad R Shankar2, Isaac R Francis2, Phillip Palmbos5.   

Abstract

RATIONALE AND
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate whether a computed tomography (CT)-based computerized decision-support system for muscle-invasive bladder cancer treatment response assessment (CDSS-T) can improve identification of patients who have responded completely to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Following Institutional Review Board approval, pre-chemotherapy and post-chemotherapy CT scans of 123 subjects with 157 muscle-invasive bladder cancer foci were collected retrospectively. CT data were analyzed with a CDSS-T that uses a combination of deep-learning convolutional neural network and radiomic features to distinguish muscle-invasive bladder cancers that have fully responded to neoadjuvant treatment from those that have not. Leave-one-case-out cross-validation was used to minimize overfitting. Five attending abdominal radiologists, four diagnostic radiology residents, two attending oncologists, and one attending urologist estimated the likelihood of pathologic T0 disease (complete response) by viewing paired pre/post-treatment CT scans placed side-by-side on an internally-developed graphical user interface. The observers provided an estimate without use of CDSS-T and then were permitted to revise their estimate after a CDSS-T-derived likelihood score was displayed. Observer estimates were analyzed with multi-reader, multi-case receiver operating characteristic methodology. The area under the curve (AUC) and the statistical significance of the difference were estimated.
RESULTS: The mean AUCs for assessment of pathologic T0 disease were 0.80 for CDSS-T alone, 0.74 for physicians not using CDSS-T, and 0.77 for physicians using CDSS-T. The increase in the physicians' performance was statistically significant (P < .05).
CONCLUSION: CDSS-T improves physician performance for identifying complete response of muscle-invasive bladder cancer to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
Copyright © 2018 The Association of University Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bladder cancer; decision support systems; observer performance study; radiomics; treatment response assessment

Year:  2018        PMID: 30424999      PMCID: PMC6510656          DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2018.10.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Radiol        ISSN: 1076-6332            Impact factor:   3.173


  12 in total

1.  Improvement of mammographic mass characterization using spiculation meausures and morphological features.

Authors:  B Sahiner; H P Chan; N Petrick; M A Helvie; L M Hadjiiski
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Computer-aided diagnosis of pulmonary nodules on CT scans: segmentation and classification using 3D active contours.

Authors:  Ted W Way; Lubomir M Hadjiiski; Berkman Sahiner; Heang-Ping Chan; Philip N Cascade; Ella A Kazerooni; Naama Bogot; Chuan Zhou
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Evaluation of computer-aided detection and diagnosis systems.

Authors:  Nicholas Petrick; Berkman Sahiner; Samuel G Armato; Alberto Bert; Loredana Correale; Silvia Delsanto; Matthew T Freedman; David Fryd; David Gur; Lubomir Hadjiiski; Zhimin Huo; Yulei Jiang; Lia Morra; Sophie Paquerault; Vikas Raykar; Frank Samuelson; Ronald M Summers; Georgia Tourassi; Hiroyuki Yoshida; Bin Zheng; Chuan Zhou; Heang-Ping Chan
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Computer-aided diagnosis of pulmonary nodules on CT scans: improvement of classification performance with nodule surface features.

Authors:  Ted W Way; Berkman Sahiner; Heang-Ping Chan; Lubomir Hadjiiski; Philip N Cascade; Aamer Chughtai; Naama Bogot; Ella Kazerooni
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Intravenous cis-platinum for invasive bladder cancer. Safety and feasibility of a new approach.

Authors:  D Raghavan; B Pearson; G Coorey; W Woods; D Arnold; J Smith; J Donovan; P Langdon
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  1984-03-03       Impact factor: 7.738

6.  Propensity Score Analysis of Radical Cystectomy Versus Bladder-Sparing Trimodal Therapy in the Setting of a Multidisciplinary Bladder Cancer Clinic.

Authors:  Girish S Kulkarni; Thomas Hermanns; Yanliang Wei; Bimal Bhindi; Raj Satkunasivam; Paul Athanasopoulos; Peter J Bostrom; Cynthia Kuk; Kathy Li; Arnoud J Templeton; Srikala S Sridhar; Theodorus H van der Kwast; Peter Chung; Robert G Bristow; Michael Milosevic; Padraig Warde; Neil E Fleshner; Michael A S Jewett; Shaheena Bashir; Alexandre R Zlotta
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-04-14       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 7.  A systematic review of neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer.

Authors:  Joshua J Meeks; Joaquim Bellmunt; Bernard H Bochner; Noel W Clarke; Siamak Daneshmand; Matthew D Galsky; Noah M Hahn; Seth P Lerner; Malcolm Mason; Thomas Powles; Cora N Sternberg; Guru Sonpavde
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 20.096

8.  New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1).

Authors:  E A Eisenhauer; P Therasse; J Bogaerts; L H Schwartz; D Sargent; R Ford; J Dancey; S Arbuck; S Gwyther; M Mooney; L Rubinstein; L Shankar; L Dodd; R Kaplan; D Lacombe; J Verweij
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 9.162

9.  Auto-initialized cascaded level set (AI-CALS) segmentation of bladder lesions on multidetector row CT urography.

Authors:  Lubomir Hadjiiski; Heang-Ping Chan; Elaine M Caoili; Richard H Cohan; Jun Wei; Chuan Zhou
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2012-10-22       Impact factor: 3.173

10.  Bladder Cancer Treatment Response Assessment in CT using Radiomics with Deep-Learning.

Authors:  Kenny H Cha; Lubomir Hadjiiski; Heang-Ping Chan; Alon Z Weizer; Ajjai Alva; Richard H Cohan; Elaine M Caoili; Chintana Paramagul; Ravi K Samala
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-18       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  13 in total

Review 1.  Current and future applications of machine and deep learning in urology: a review of the literature on urolithiasis, renal cell carcinoma, and bladder and prostate cancer.

Authors:  Rodrigo Suarez-Ibarrola; Simon Hein; Gerd Reis; Christian Gratzke; Arkadiusz Miernik
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-11-05       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Development of a radiomic signature for predicting response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in muscle-invasive bladder cancer.

Authors:  Ambica Parmar; Abdul Aziz Qazi; Audrius Stundzia; Hao-Wen Sim; Jeremy Lewin; Ur Metser; Martin O'Malley; Aaron R Hansen
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2022-03       Impact factor: 1.862

3.  Classification of malignant tumors by a non-sequential recurrent ensemble of deep neural network model.

Authors:  Dipanjan Moitra; Rakesh Kr Mandal
Journal:  Multimed Tools Appl       Date:  2022-02-14       Impact factor: 2.577

4.  Efficacy of Raman spectroscopy in the diagnosis of bladder cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hongyu Jin; Tianhai Lin; Ping Han; Yijun Yao; Danxi Zheng; Jianqi Hao; Yiqing Hu; Rui Zeng
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 1.817

Review 5.  Study Progress of Radiomics With Machine Learning for Precision Medicine in Bladder Cancer Management.

Authors:  Lingling Ge; Yuntian Chen; Chunyi Yan; Pan Zhao; Peng Zhang; Runa A; Jiaming Liu
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2019-11-28       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 6.  The Role of Imaging in Bladder Cancer Diagnosis and Staging.

Authors:  Samuel J Galgano; Kristin K Porter; Constantine Burgan; Soroush Rais-Bahrami
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2020-09-16

7.  Association of Clinician Diagnostic Performance With Machine Learning-Based Decision Support Systems: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Baptiste Vasey; Stephan Ursprung; Benjamin Beddoe; Elliott H Taylor; Neale Marlow; Nicole Bilbro; Peter Watkinson; Peter McCulloch
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-03-01

8.  Intraobserver Variability in Bladder Cancer Treatment Response Assessment With and Without Computerized Decision Support.

Authors:  Lubomir M Hadjiiski; Kenny H Cha; Richard H Cohan; Heang-Ping Chan; Elaine M Caoili; Matthew S Davenport; Ravi K Samala; Alon Z Weizer; Ajjai Alva; Galina Kirova-Nedyalkova; Kimberly Shampain; Nathaniel Meyer; Daniel Barkmeier; Sean A Woolen; Prasad R Shankar; Isaac R Francis; Phillip L Palmbos
Journal:  Tomography       Date:  2020-06

Review 9.  The Bionic Radiologist: avoiding blurry pictures and providing greater insights.

Authors:  Marc Dewey; Uta Wilkens
Journal:  NPJ Digit Med       Date:  2019-07-09

10.  A data-driven approach to a chemotherapy recommendation model based on deep learning for patients with colorectal cancer in Korea.

Authors:  Jin-Hyeok Park; Jeong-Heum Baek; Sun Jin Sym; Kang Yoon Lee; Youngho Lee
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2020-09-22       Impact factor: 2.796

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.