RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To develop a computerized system for segmentation of bladder lesions on computed tomography urography (CTU) scans for detection and characterization of bladder cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We have developed an auto-initialized cascaded level set method to perform bladder lesion segmentation. The segmentation performance was evaluated on a preliminary dataset including 28 CTU scans from 28 patients collected retrospectively with institutional review board approval. The bladders were partially filled with intravenous contrast material. The lesions were located fully or partially within the contrast-enhanced area or in the non-contrast-enhanced area of the bladder. An experienced abdominal radiologist marked 28 lesions (14 malignant and 14 benign) with bounding boxes that served as input to the automated segmentation system and assigned a difficulty rating on a scale of 1 to 5 (5 = most subtle) to each lesion. The contours from automated segmentation were compared to three-dimensional contours manually drawn by the radiologist. Three performance metric measures were used for comparison. In addition, the automated segmentation quality was assessed by an expert panel of two experienced radiologists, who provided quality ratings of the contours on a scale from 1 to 10 (10 = excellent). RESULTS: The average volume intersection ratio, the average absolute volume error, and the average distance measure were 67.2 ± 16.9%, 27.3 ± 26.9%, and 2.89 ± 1.69 mm, respectively. Of the 28 segmentations, 18 were given quality ratings of 8 or above. The average rating was 7.9 ± 1.5. The average quality ratings for lesions with difficulty ratings of 1, 2, 3, and 4 were 8.8 ± 0.9, 7.9 ± 1.8, 7.4 ± 0.9, and 6.6 ± 1.5, respectively. CONCLUSION: Our preliminary study demonstrates the feasibility of using the three-dimensional level set method for segmenting bladder lesions in CTU scans.
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To develop a computerized system for segmentation of bladder lesions on computed tomography urography (CTU) scans for detection and characterization of bladder cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We have developed an auto-initialized cascaded level set method to perform bladder lesion segmentation. The segmentation performance was evaluated on a preliminary dataset including 28 CTU scans from 28 patients collected retrospectively with institutional review board approval. The bladders were partially filled with intravenous contrast material. The lesions were located fully or partially within the contrast-enhanced area or in the non-contrast-enhanced area of the bladder. An experienced abdominal radiologist marked 28 lesions (14 malignant and 14 benign) with bounding boxes that served as input to the automated segmentation system and assigned a difficulty rating on a scale of 1 to 5 (5 = most subtle) to each lesion. The contours from automated segmentation were compared to three-dimensional contours manually drawn by the radiologist. Three performance metric measures were used for comparison. In addition, the automated segmentation quality was assessed by an expert panel of two experienced radiologists, who provided quality ratings of the contours on a scale from 1 to 10 (10 = excellent). RESULTS: The average volume intersection ratio, the average absolute volume error, and the average distance measure were 67.2 ± 16.9%, 27.3 ± 26.9%, and 2.89 ± 1.69 mm, respectively. Of the 28 segmentations, 18 were given quality ratings of 8 or above. The average rating was 7.9 ± 1.5. The average quality ratings for lesions with difficulty ratings of 1, 2, 3, and 4 were 8.8 ± 0.9, 7.9 ± 1.8, 7.4 ± 0.9, and 6.6 ± 1.5, respectively. CONCLUSION: Our preliminary study demonstrates the feasibility of using the three-dimensional level set method for segmenting bladder lesions in CTU scans.
Authors: B Sahiner; N Petrick; H P Chan; L M Hadjiiski; C Paramagul; M A Helvie; M N Gurcan Journal: IEEE Trans Med Imaging Date: 2001-12 Impact factor: 10.048
Authors: Ted W Way; Lubomir M Hadjiiski; Berkman Sahiner; Heang-Ping Chan; Philip N Cascade; Ella A Kazerooni; Naama Bogot; Chuan Zhou Journal: Med Phys Date: 2006-07 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Elaine M Caoili; Richard H Cohan; Melvyn Korobkin; Joel F Platt; Isaac R Francis; Gary J Faerber; James E Montie; James H Ellis Journal: Radiology Date: 2002-02 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Gary S Sudakoff; Dell P Dunn; Michael L Guralnick; Robert S Hellman; Daniel Eastwood; William A See Journal: J Urol Date: 2008-01-25 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Sankeerth S Garapati; Lubomir Hadjiiski; Kenny H Cha; Heang-Ping Chan; Elaine M Caoili; Richard H Cohan; Alon Weizer; Ajjai Alva; Chintana Paramagul; Jun Wei; Chuan Zhou Journal: Med Phys Date: 2017-09-05 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Kenny H Cha; Lubomir M Hadjiiski; Richard H Cohan; Heang-Ping Chan; Elaine M Caoili; Matthew S Davenport; Ravi K Samala; Alon Z Weizer; Ajjai Alva; Galina Kirova-Nedyalkova; Kimberly Shampain; Nathaniel Meyer; Daniel Barkmeier; Sean Woolen; Prasad R Shankar; Isaac R Francis; Phillip Palmbos Journal: Acad Radiol Date: 2018-11-10 Impact factor: 3.173
Authors: Kenny H Cha; Lubomir Hadjiiski; Heang-Ping Chan; Alon Z Weizer; Ajjai Alva; Richard H Cohan; Elaine M Caoili; Chintana Paramagul; Ravi K Samala Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2017-08-18 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Kenny H Cha; Lubomir M Hadjiiski; Ravi K Samala; Heang-Ping Chan; Richard H Cohan; Elaine M Caoili; Chintana Paramagul; Ajjai Alva; Alon Z Weizer Journal: Tomography Date: 2016-12
Authors: Eric Wu; Lubomir M Hadjiiski; Ravi K Samala; Heang-Ping Chan; Kenny H Cha; Caleb Richter; Richard H Cohan; Elaine M Caoili; Chintana Paramagul; Ajjai Alva; Alon Z Weizer Journal: Tomography Date: 2019-03
Authors: Di Sun; Lubomir Hadjiiski; Ajjai Alva; Yousef Zakharia; Monika Joshi; Heang-Ping Chan; Rohan Garje; Lauren Pomerantz; Dean Elhag; Richard H Cohan; Elaine M Caoili; Wesley T Kerr; Kenny H Cha; Galina Kirova-Nedyalkova; Matthew S Davenport; Prasad R Shankar; Isaac R Francis; Kimberly Shampain; Nathaniel Meyer; Daniel Barkmeier; Sean Woolen; Phillip L Palmbos; Alon Z Weizer; Ravi K Samala; Chuan Zhou; Martha Matuszak Journal: Tomography Date: 2022-03-02
Authors: Lubomir M Hadjiiski; Kenny H Cha; Richard H Cohan; Heang-Ping Chan; Elaine M Caoili; Matthew S Davenport; Ravi K Samala; Alon Z Weizer; Ajjai Alva; Galina Kirova-Nedyalkova; Kimberly Shampain; Nathaniel Meyer; Daniel Barkmeier; Sean A Woolen; Prasad R Shankar; Isaac R Francis; Phillip L Palmbos Journal: Tomography Date: 2020-06