Rodrigo Suarez-Ibarrola1, Simon Hein2, Gerd Reis3, Christian Gratzke2, Arkadiusz Miernik2. 1. Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg-Medical Centre, Hugstetter Str. 55, 79106, Freiburg, Germany. rodrigo.suarez@uniklinik-freiburg.de. 2. Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg-Medical Centre, Hugstetter Str. 55, 79106, Freiburg, Germany. 3. Department Augmented Vision, German Research Center for Artificial Intelligence, Kaiserslautern, Germany.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to provide a comprehensive review of recent machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) applications in urological practice. Numerous studies have reported their use in the medical care of various urological disorders; however, no critical analysis has been made to date. METHODS: A detailed search of original articles was performed using the PubMed MEDLINE database to identify recent English literature relevant to ML and DL applications in the fields of urolithiasis, renal cell carcinoma (RCC), bladder cancer (BCa), and prostate cancer (PCa). RESULTS: In total, 43 articles were included addressing these four subfields. The most common ML and DL application in urolithiasis is in the prediction of endourologic surgical outcomes. The main area of research involving ML and DL in RCC concerns the differentiation between benign and malignant small renal masses, Fuhrman nuclear grade prediction, and gene expression-based molecular signatures. BCa studies employ radiomics and texture feature analysis for the distinction between low- and high-grade tumors, address accurate image-based cytology, and use algorithms to predict treatment response, tumor recurrence, and patient survival. PCa studies aim at developing algorithms for Gleason score prediction, MRI computer-aided diagnosis, and surgical outcomes and biochemical recurrence prediction. Studies consistently found the superiority of these methods over traditional statistical methods. CONCLUSIONS: The continuous incorporation of clinical data, further ML and DL algorithm retraining, and generalizability of models will augment the prediction accuracy and enhance individualized medicine.
PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to provide a comprehensive review of recent machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) applications in urological practice. Numerous studies have reported their use in the medical care of various urological disorders; however, no critical analysis has been made to date. METHODS: A detailed search of original articles was performed using the PubMed MEDLINE database to identify recent English literature relevant to ML and DL applications in the fields of urolithiasis, renal cell carcinoma (RCC), bladder cancer (BCa), and prostate cancer (PCa). RESULTS: In total, 43 articles were included addressing these four subfields. The most common ML and DL application in urolithiasis is in the prediction of endourologic surgical outcomes. The main area of research involving ML and DL in RCC concerns the differentiation between benign and malignant small renal masses, Fuhrman nuclear grade prediction, and gene expression-based molecular signatures. BCa studies employ radiomics and texture feature analysis for the distinction between low- and high-grade tumors, address accurate image-based cytology, and use algorithms to predict treatment response, tumor recurrence, and patient survival. PCa studies aim at developing algorithms for Gleason score prediction, MRI computer-aided diagnosis, and surgical outcomes and biochemical recurrence prediction. Studies consistently found the superiority of these methods over traditional statistical methods. CONCLUSIONS: The continuous incorporation of clinical data, further ML and DL algorithm retraining, and generalizability of models will augment the prediction accuracy and enhance individualized medicine.
Authors: Min Soo Choo; Saangyong Uhmn; Jong Keun Kim; Jun Hyun Han; Dong-Hoi Kim; Jin Kim; Seong Ho Lee Journal: J Urol Date: 2018-07-20 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Adam O Kadlec; Samuel Ohlander; James Hotaling; Jessica Hannick; Craig Niederberger; Thomas M Turk Journal: Urolithiasis Date: 2014-04-02 Impact factor: 3.436
Authors: Kevin T Hobbs; Nathaniel Choe; Leonid I Aksenov; Lourdes Reyes; Wilkins Aquino; Jonathan C Routh; James A Hokanson Journal: Urology Date: 2021-10-29 Impact factor: 2.649
Authors: Adam M Awe; Michael M Vanden Heuvel; Tianyuan Yuan; Victoria R Rendell; Mingren Shen; Agrima Kampani; Shanchao Liang; Dane D Morgan; Emily R Winslow; Meghan G Lubner Journal: Abdom Radiol (NY) Date: 2021-10-12
Authors: Ahmed Alksas; Mohamed Shehata; Gehad A Saleh; Ahmed Shaffie; Ahmed Soliman; Mohammed Ghazal; Adel Khelifi; Hadil Abu Khalifeh; Ahmed Abdel Razek; Guruprasad A Giridharan; Ayman El-Baz Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2021-06-23 Impact factor: 4.379