| Literature DB >> 30424773 |
Fan Yang1, Sheng Yao1, Kai-Fang Chen1, Feng-Zhao Zhu1, Ze-Kang Xiong1, Yan-Hui Ji1, Ting-Fang Sun1, Xiao-Dong Guo2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Iliosacral screw fixation is a popular method for the management of posterior pelvic ring fractures or dislocations, providing adequate biomechanical stability. Our aim in this study was to describe the use of a new patient-specific external template to guide the insertion of iliosacral screws and to evaluate the efficacy and safety of this technique compared with the conventional fluoroscopy-guided technique.Entities:
Keywords: External template; Iliosacral screw; Minimal invasive; Novel navigation tool; Pelvic fracture
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30424773 PMCID: PMC6234543 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-018-2320-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord ISSN: 1471-2474 Impact factor: 2.362
Fig. 1Two types of navigation templates for iliosacral screw insertion. a Virtual internal template, docked on the bone surface of the posterior iliac crest. b Virtual external template, mounted on the two external fixator pins
Fig. 2Structure of the external template. a The main template contains the mounting and guide sleeves. It was designed to be divided into two parts, through the central axis of the mounting sleeve. b Template assembled intra-operatively. The external template can be combined with the pelvic reduction frame as necessary
Demographic and surgery details
| Template group ( | Conventional group ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Sex | Male 11, Female 11 | Male 10, Female 8 | 0.726* |
| Age (years) | 51.7 ± 15.2 | 50.1 ± 13.7 | 0.728# |
| Time from injury-to-surgery (days) | 5.4 ± 2.0 | 4.1 ± 2.0 | 0.049# |
| AO/OTA classification of sacrum | 0.723** | ||
| 54B | 7 | 4 | |
| 54C | 15 | 14 | |
| Posterior pelvic ring disruption, | 1.000** | ||
| SI dislocation | 3 (13.6%) | 2 (11.1%) | |
| Denis zone I fracture | 8 (36.4%) | 7 (38.9%) | |
| Denis zone II fracture | 11 (50.0%) | 9 (50.0%) | |
| Number of screws | 0.954* | ||
| S1 | 20 | 16 | |
| S2 | 18 | 14 | |
| Operation time (min) | < 0.001# | ||
| S1 | 18.7 ± 4.3 | 39.8 ± 10.6 | |
| S2 | 17.1 ± 4.7 | 39.6 ± 11.1 | |
| Average | 17.9 ± 4.5 | 39.7 ± 10.7 | |
| Radiation exposure (cGy/cm2) | < 0.001# | ||
| S1 | 755.2 ± 239.5 | 1852.1 ± 844.5 | |
| S2 | 729.1 ± 226.5 | 1963.3 ± 872.3 | |
| Average | 742.8 ± 230.6 | 1904.0 ± 844.5 |
P value < 0.05 considered statistically significant
*Pearson chi-squared test
**Fisher’s exact test
# Two independent samples Student’s t-test
SI sacroiliac joint
Values are presented as the mean ± standard deviation, unless otherwise indicated
Fig. 3External template designed using Mimics software. a A 3D model of the pelvis was reconstructed including the marker pins. b S1 and S2 virtual screws were placed into the sacrum and adjusted to the midway of the osseous corridor without any penetration. c-f The template was designed to connect the marker pins and virtual screws, providing sleeves to attach the template on the marker pins and guide the K-wire to the target corridor. Black arrow indicates the guide sleeve for the anterior column screw. (d/f) The plate is low-profile, minimizing the distance between both template and skin, and marker pins and virtual screws
Fig. 4Intraoperative application of the external template. a-b Preoperative AP radiographs/3D reconstruction of computed tomography images for a patient with a Denis zone II sacral fracture and bilateral pubic ramus fractures. c-f Intraoperative fluoroscopy (d/e/f outlet/inlet/lateral view) was used, minimally, to confirm the guide wire and screw in the target corridor. The red arrow in (c) indicates the guide sleeve for the anterior column screw. g-i Postoperative AP radiograph/computed tomography axial image confirmed the placement of the IS screws
Fig. 5The procedure for postoperative measurements. a-b The S1 and S2 axial views obtained after insertion of the partially threaded screws were merged with the pre-operative images used for planning (red bar). c The deviation distance between the inserted and planned virtual screw was measured on the sagittal plane at the nerve root tunnel zone. d The deviation angle was measured on the superimposed image of the pre- and postoperative 3D reconstructions
Quality of the reduction
| Excellent (≤4 mm) | Good (4–10 mm) | Fair (10–20 mm) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Template group | 7 | 12 | 3 | 1.000* |
| Conventional group | 5 | 11 | 2 |
*Fisher’s exact test; p < 0.05 considered statistically significant
The rate of screw perforation
| Grade 0 | Grade 1 | Grade 2 | Perforation | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Template group | 97.4% | 2.6% | 0% | 5.3% | < 0.001* |
| S1 ( | 19 | 1 | 0 | ||
| S2 ( | 18 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Conventional group | 86.7% | 6.7% | 6.7% | 13.7% | |
| S1 ( | 14 | 1 | 1 | ||
| S2 ( | 12 | 1 | 1 |
*Fisher’s exact test; p < 0.05 considered statistically significant