Literature DB >> 30418665

Sex bias in preclinical research and an exploration of how to change the status quo.

Natasha A Karp1, Neil Reavey2,3.   

Abstract

There has been a revolution within clinical trials to include females in the research pipeline. However, there has been limited change in the preclinical arena; yet the research here lays the ground work for the subsequent clinical trials. Sex bias has been highlighted as one of the contributing factors to the poor translation and replicability issues undermining preclinical research. There have been multiple calls for action, and the funders of biomedical research are actively pushing the inclusion of sex as a biological variable. Here, we consider the current standard practice within the preclinical research setting, why there is a movement to include females and why the imbalance exists. We explore organizational change theory as a tool to shape strategies needed at an individual and institute level to change the status quo. The ultimate goal is to create a scientific environment in which our preclinical research automatically implements sex-sensitive approaches. LINKED ARTICLES: This article is part of a themed section on The Importance of Sex Differences in Pharmacology Research. To view the other articles in this section visit http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bph.v176.21/issuetoc.
© 2018 The British Pharmacological Society.

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30418665      PMCID: PMC6877896          DOI: 10.1111/bph.14539

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Pharmacol        ISSN: 0007-1188            Impact factor:   8.739


  38 in total

1.  Incorporating Sex as a Variable in Preclinical Neuropsychiatric Research.

Authors:  Margaret M McCarthy
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2015-06-11       Impact factor: 9.306

2.  Policy: NIH to balance sex in cell and animal studies.

Authors:  Janine A Clayton; Francis S Collins
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-05-15       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Policy: NIH plans to enhance reproducibility.

Authors:  Francis S Collins; Lawrence A Tabak
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-01-30       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Reporting of sex as a variable in cardiovascular studies using cultured cells.

Authors:  K Efua Taylor; Catalina Vallejo-Giraldo; Niccole S Schaible; Rosita Zakeri; Virginia M Miller
Journal:  Biol Sex Differ       Date:  2011-11-07       Impact factor: 5.027

Review 5.  NIH initiative to balance sex of animals in preclinical studies: generative questions to guide policy, implementation, and metrics.

Authors:  Louise D McCullough; Geert J de Vries; Virginia M Miller; Jill B Becker; Kathryn Sandberg; Margaret M McCarthy
Journal:  Biol Sex Differ       Date:  2014-10-03       Impact factor: 5.027

6.  Reinventing Biostatistics Education for Basic Scientists.

Authors:  Tracey L Weissgerber; Vesna D Garovic; Jelena S Milin-Lazovic; Stacey J Winham; Zoran Obradovic; Jerome P Trzeciakowski; Natasa M Milic
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2016-04-08       Impact factor: 8.029

7.  Authorization of Animal Experiments Is Based on Confidence Rather than Evidence of Scientific Rigor.

Authors:  Lucile Vogt; Thomas S Reichlin; Christina Nathues; Hanno Würbel
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2016-12-02       Impact factor: 8.029

8.  Prevalence of sexual dimorphism in mammalian phenotypic traits.

Authors:  Natasha A Karp; Jeremy Mason; Arthur L Beaudet; Yoav Benjamini; Lynette Bower; Robert E Braun; Steve D M Brown; Elissa J Chesler; Mary E Dickinson; Ann M Flenniken; Helmut Fuchs; Martin Hrabe de Angelis; Xiang Gao; Shiying Guo; Simon Greenaway; Ruth Heller; Yann Herault; Monica J Justice; Natalja Kurbatova; Christopher J Lelliott; K C Kent Lloyd; Ann-Marie Mallon; Judith E Mank; Hiroshi Masuya; Colin McKerlie; Terrence F Meehan; Richard F Mott; Stephen A Murray; Helen Parkinson; Ramiro Ramirez-Solis; Luis Santos; John R Seavitt; Damian Smedley; Tania Sorg; Anneliese O Speak; Karen P Steel; Karen L Svenson; Shigeharu Wakana; David West; Sara Wells; Henrik Westerberg; Shay Yaacoby; Jacqueline K White
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-06-26       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  Attitudes towards statistics of graduate entry medical students: the role of prior learning experiences.

Authors:  Ailish Hannigan; Avril C Hegarty; Deirdre McGrath
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2014-04-04       Impact factor: 2.463

10.  The extent and consequences of p-hacking in science.

Authors:  Megan L Head; Luke Holman; Rob Lanfear; Andrew T Kahn; Michael D Jennions
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2015-03-13       Impact factor: 8.029

View more
  14 in total

Review 1.  Sex bias in preclinical research and an exploration of how to change the status quo.

Authors:  Natasha A Karp; Neil Reavey
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2018-12-12       Impact factor: 8.739

2.  Reproducibility of animal research in light of biological variation.

Authors:  Bernhard Voelkl; Naomi S Altman; Anders Forsman; Wolfgang Forstmeier; Jessica Gurevitch; Ivana Jaric; Natasha A Karp; Martien J Kas; Holger Schielzeth; Tom Van de Casteele; Hanno Würbel
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2020-06-02       Impact factor: 34.870

3.  The importance of sex differences in pharmacology research.

Authors:  Andrea Gogos; Christopher Langmead; Jennifer C Sullivan; Andrew J Lawrence
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 8.739

Review 4.  The impact of sex and age on T cell immunity and ischemic stroke outcomes.

Authors:  Hilda Ahnstedt; Louise D McCullough
Journal:  Cell Immunol       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 4.868

Review 5.  Antidepressant effects of ketamine on depression-related phenotypes and dopamine dysfunction in rodent models of stress.

Authors:  Millie Rincón-Cortés; Anthony A Grace
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2019-11-15       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Aberrant IL-17 Levels in Rodent Models of Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Alexandra Jade Thawley; Luciana Peixoto Veneziani; Francisco Diego Rabelo-da-Ponte; Ingo Riederer; Daniella Areas Mendes-da-Cruz; Victorio Bambini-Junior
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-06-10       Impact factor: 8.786

Review 7.  X- and Y-Linked Chromatin-Modifying Genes as Regulators of Sex-Specific Cancer Incidence and Prognosis.

Authors:  Rossella Tricarico; Emmanuelle Nicolas; Michael J Hall; Erica A Golemis
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2020-07-30       Impact factor: 12.531

8.  Lower variability in female students than male students at multiple timescales supports the use of sex as a biological variable in human studies.

Authors:  Benjamin L Smarr; Aaron E Schirmer; Annick Laure Ishami
Journal:  Biol Sex Differ       Date:  2021-04-22       Impact factor: 5.027

Review 9.  What is the optimum design for my animal experiment?

Authors:  Natasha A Karp; Derek Fry
Journal:  BMJ Open Sci       Date:  2021-03-15

10.  Strain-, Sex-, and Time-Dependent Antidepressant-like Effects of Cannabidiol.

Authors:  Gabriela P Silote; Michelle C Gatto; Amanda Eskelund; Francisco S Guimarães; Gregers Wegener; Sâmia R L Joca
Journal:  Pharmaceuticals (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.