| Literature DB >> 35757754 |
Alexandra Jade Thawley1, Luciana Peixoto Veneziani1,2,3,4, Francisco Diego Rabelo-da-Ponte1,5, Ingo Riederer1,2,3,4, Daniella Areas Mendes-da-Cruz1,2,3,4, Victorio Bambini-Junior1,3,6.
Abstract
Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a heterogeneous neurodevelopmental disorder characterised by stereotyped behaviours, specific interests, and impaired communication skills. Elevated levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as interleukin-17A (IL-17A or IL-17), have been implicated as part of immune alterations that may contribute to this outcome. In this context, rodent models have helped elucidate the role of T-cell activation and IL-17 secretion in the pathogenesis of ASD. Regarding the preclinical findings, the data available is contradictory in offspring but not in the pregnant dams, pointing to IL-17 as one of the main drivers of altered behaviour in some models ASD, whilst there are no alterations described in IL-17 levels in others. To address this gap in the literature, a systematic review of altered IL-17 levels in rodent models of ASD was conducted. In total, 28 studies that explored IL-17 levels were included and observed that this cytokine was generally increased among the different models of ASD. The data compiled in this review can help the choice of animal models to study the role of cytokines in the development of ASD, seeking a parallel with immune alterations observed in individuals with this condition. Systematic Review Registration: PROSPERO, identifier CRD42022306558.Entities:
Keywords: IL-17; animal model; autism spectrum disorder; inflammation; systematic review
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35757754 PMCID: PMC9226456 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.874064
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Immunol ISSN: 1664-3224 Impact factor: 8.786
Bias assessment and study quality using animal data from experimental studies (CAMARADES) checklist items.
| Author | Peer-reviewed publication | Random allocation | Animal model | Sex-matched animals | Age-matched animals | Sample size calculation | Compliance with animal welfare regulations | Statement of conflict of interests | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ozaki et al, 2020 ( | X | X | X | X | X | 5 | |||
| Arrode-Brusés and Brusés, 2012 ( | X | X | X | X | X | X | 6 | ||
| Schwartzer et al, 2013 ( | X | X | X | X | X | X | 6 | ||
| Pendyala et al, 2017 ( | X | X | X | X | X | 5 | |||
| Xu et al., 2017 ( | X | X | X | X | X | X | 6 | ||
| Reed et al., 2020 ( | X | X | X | X | X | X | 6 | ||
| Choi et al., 2016 ( | X | X | X | X | 4 | ||||
| Ahmad et al, 2018 ( | X | X | X | X | X | X | 6 | ||
| Nadeem et al, 2019 ( | X | X | X | X | X | X | 6 | ||
| Lammert et al, 2018 ( | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | 7 | |
| Yasumatsu et al, 2020 ( | X | X | X | X | 4 | ||||
| Bakheet et al, 2017 ( | X | X | X | X | 4 | ||||
| Ansari et al, 2017 ( | X | X | X | X | X | X | 6 | ||
| Hsiao et al, 2012 ( | X | X | X | X | X | 5 | |||
| Zhang et al, 2013 ( | X | X | X | X | X | 5 | |||
| Luan et al, 2015 ( | X | X | X | X | X | X | 6 | ||
| Chen et al, 2019 ( | X | X | X | X | X | 5 | |||
| Gumusoglu et al., 2020 ( | X | X | X | X | X | 5 | |||
| Afroz et al., 2021 ( | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | 6 | |
| Alhosani et al., 2021 ( | X | X | X | X | X | 5 | |||
| Heo et al., 2011 ( | X | X | X | X | X | X | 5 | ||
| Jaini et al., 2021 ( | X | X | X | X | X | 5 | |||
| Kalish et al., 2021 ( | X | X | X | X | X | X | 6 | ||
| Schwartzer et al., 2017 ( | X | X | X | X | X | 5 | |||
| Senkal et al., 2021 ( | X | X | X | X | X | X | 6 | ||
| Shin et al., 2021 ( | X | X | X | X | X | 5 | |||
| Shimizu et al., 2021 ( | X | X | X | X | X | 5 | |||
| Kim et al., 2022 ( | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | 7 |
Systematic Review Centre for Laboratory animal Experimentation (SYRCLE) scale for risk of bias.
| Author | Sequence generation | Baseline characteristics | Allocation concealment | Random Housing | Blinding(Investigators) | Random (outcome assessment) | Blinding (outcome assessors) | Incomplete outcome data addressed | No selective outcome reporting | No other source of bias | Total Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ozaki et al, 2020 ( | N | Y | U | N | N | U | N | U | Y | Y | 3 |
| Arrode-Brusés | N | Y | N | N | N | N | U | Y | Y | Y | 4 |
| Schwartzer et al, 2013 ( | N | Y | N | N | U | U | U | Y | Y | Y | 4 |
| Pendyala et al, 2017 ( | N | Y | N | N | U | N | U | Y | Y | Y | 4 |
| Xu et al., 2017 ( | Y | Y | N | N | U | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | 7 |
| Reed et al., 2020 ( | Y | Y | Y | U | Y | U | Y | Y | Y | Y | 8 |
| Choi et al., 2016 ( | N | Y | N | N | U | U | N | U | Y | Y | 3 |
| Ahmad et al, 2018 ( | N | Y | N | N | N | U | N | N | U | Y | 2 |
| Lammert et al, 2018 ( | Y | Y | U | U | Y | U | U | U | Y | Y | 5 |
| Yasumatsu et al, 2020 ( | N | Y | N | N | N | N | N | U | Y | Y | 3 |
| Bakheet et al, 2017 ( | N | Y | N | N | N | U | N | N | U | Y | 2 |
| Ansari et al, 2017 ( | N | Y | N | N | N | N | N | Y | U | Y | 3 |
| Hsiao et al, 2012 ( | N | Y | N | N | N | N | Y | U | Y | Y | 4 |
| Zhang et al, 2013 ( | N | Y | N | N | N | N | N | U | U | Y | 2 |
| Luan et al, 2015 ( | Y | Y | N | U | N | N | N | U | Y | Y | 4 |
| Chen et al, 2019 ( | N | Y | N | N | N | N | N | Y | Y | Y | 4 |
| Nadeem et al., 2019 ( | N | Y | N | N | U | U | Y | U | U | Y | 3 |
| Gumusoglu et al., 2020 ( | N | Y | N | N | Y | U | U | Y | Y | Y | 5 |
| Afroz et al., 2021 ( | N | Y | N | N | N | N | Y | U | Y | Y | 4 |
| Alhosani et al., 2021 ( | N | Y | N | N | N | N | N | U | U | Y | 2 |
| Heo et al., 2011 ( | N | Y | N | N | N | N | N | U | N | Y | 3 |
| Jaini et al., 2021 ( | N | Y | N | N | Y | U | Y | U | Y | Y | 5 |
| Kalish et al., 2021 ( | N | Y | N | N | N | U | N | U | Y | Y | 3 |
| Schwartzer et al., 2017 ( | N | Y | N | N | Y | N | N | N | Y | Y | 4 |
| Senkal et al., 2021 ( | N | Y | N | N | Y | U | Y | U | Y | Y | 5 |
| Shin et al., 2021 ( | N | Y | N | N | N | N | N | U | U | Y | 2 |
| Shimizu et al., 2021 ( | N | Y | N | N | Y | N | Y | U | Y | Y | 5 |
| Kim et al., 2022 ( | N | Y | N | N | Y | N | N | U | Y | Y | 4 |
Y (Yes) = 1 score; N (No) = 0 score; U (Unclear) = 0.
Figure 1Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) flowchart.
Qualitative synthesis of studies included.
| Author | Species | Strain | Sex | Sample size | Rodent ASD model | Dose (mg/kg) | Inducement | Route | Treatment age | Testing age | Tissue used | Technique used | IL-17 alteration | Statistically significant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ozaki, 2020 ( | mice | C57BL/6N | male | 4 | MIA | 10 | Poly(I:C) | i.p | E12, E15 | foetal, E12,E15, P10 | microglia, liver, placenta, brain, serum | RT-PCR, | increase | No |
| Arrode-Brusés, 2012 ( | mice | C57BL/6N | both | NS | MIA | 20 | Poly(I:C) | i.p | GD16, PND4 | P4, foetal | maternal serum, offspring brains | Milliplex Map | increase | Yes |
| Schwartzer, 2013 ( | mice | C57BL/6N /BTBR | both | 12 to 18 | MIA/BTBR | 20 | Poly(I:C) | i.p | E12.5 | 11 weeks | spleen | murine multiplexing bead immunoassays | increase | Yes |
| Pendyala, 2017 ( | mice | (Pcp2-EGFP)BT153Gsat/Mmmh | both | P1,P7= 4; P14,P30 =6 | MIA | 20 | Poly(I:C) | i.p | E12.5 | P1, P7, P14, P30 | cerebellar lysates | multiplex ELISA, QAM-CYT-5 | decrease at P30 | Yes |
| Xu, 2017 ( | rats | Wistar | both | 10 | MIA | 0,05 | LPS | i.p | E12.5 | 1 month | serum | ELISA | increase | No |
| Reed, 2020 ( | mice | C57BL/6N | male | 4 to 8 | MIA | 20 | Poly(I:C) | i.p | E12.5 | E12.5 | serum | ELISA | Increase after immune stimuli | Yes |
| Choi, 2016 ( | mice | C57BL/6N | male | NS | MIA | 20 | Poly(I:C) | i.p | E12.5 | E14.5 | placenta, decidua, maternal serum | ELISA, RT-PCR, Flow cytometry | increase | Yes |
| Ahmad, 2018 ( | mice | n/a | male | NS | BTBR | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | 7-9 weeks | spleen, brain | Flow cytometry, western blotting, RT-PCR | increase | Yes |
| Nadeem, 2019 ( | mice | n/a | male | NS | BTBR | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | 8-10 weeks | Splenocytes, CD4+ cells, cerebellum | Flow cytometry, RT-PCR | increase | Yes |
| Lammert, 2018 ( | mice | C57BL/6N | both | NS | MIA | 20 | Poly(I:C) | i.p. | E11.5, E12.5 | E14.5 | maternal serum | ELISA, Cytokine blockade | increase | Yes |
| Yasumatsu, 2020 ( | mice | C57BL/6N | male | NS | MIA | 0.05 | LPS | i.p | E14 | foetal, mother | maternal uterus, brain | ELISA, qRT-PCR, Flow cytometry | increase | Yes |
| Bakheet, 2017 ( | mice | n/a | male | NS | BTBR | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | 6-8 week | spleen, brain, CD4 t cells | Flow cytometry, RT-PCR, intracellular staining | increase | Yes |
| Ansari, 2017 ( | mice | n/a | male | 6 | BTBR | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | 6-8 week | spleen, brain | Flow cytometry, western blotting, RT-PCR | increase | Yes |
| Hsiao, 2012 ( | mice | C57BL/6N | both | NS | MIA | 20 | Poly(I:C) | ip | E12.5 | 15 weeks | CD4+ T cells | ELISA | increase | Yes |
| Zhang, 2013 ( | mice | BTBR/C57BL/6 | both | NS | BTBR | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | 2-3 months | Splenic TCD4 | Flow cytometry | increase | Unclear |
| Luan, 2015 ( | mice | B6 | both | NS | MIA | 0,05 | LPS | i.p | E12.5 | dam, 8-12-week offspring | CD4 T cells from liver and, spleen | Intracellular cytokine staining | increase | Yes |
| Chen, 2019 ( | mice | C57BL/6N | male | 5 | Chemical and MIA | 0.25 μl/hr 20 | BDE209, Pb, BDE209/Pb poly(I:C) | subcutaneous osmotic pump i.p | E9.5 E12.5 | P 30 | serum | Cytometric bead array | increase | Yes |
| Gumusoglu, 2020 ( | mice | C57BL/6N | both | 8 | MIA | 25 | IL-17 | subcutaneous osmotic pump | chronic (hourly) | E18 | kidney, placenta, brains | ELISA | increase | No |
| Afroz, 2021 ( | mice | C57Bl6 | Female | 8 -9 per group | Parental High salt diet (HSD) | chow supplemented with 0.1% NaCl | 8 weeks HSD | Oral | 3-4 weeks | Maternal serum | Flow Cytometry | No | No | |
| Alhosaini, 2021 ( | mice | C57 /BTBR | Male | 6 per group | BTBR | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | 10-12 week | Splenocytes, Brain Tissue | Flow Cytometry, RT-qPCR, Western Blotting | Increase in BTBR | Yes |
| Heo, 2011 ( | mice | C57BL/6 / BTBR/ BCF1/CBF1 | both | 3 - 5 per group | BTBR/ BCF1/CBF1 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | PND 21 and 70 | Liver | ND | Increase | Yes ** data not shown |
| Jaini, 2021 ( | mice | PtenWT/m3m4 and PtenWT/WT | Female | 5 per group | PtenWT/m3m4 and PtenWT/WT | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | Pregnant dams at E17.5 | Maternal Spleen/Serum | qRT-PCR, ELISA | No | n/a |
| Kim, 2022 ( | mice | C57Bl6 | both | 12 - 18 (Variable) | MIA | 20 mg/kg | poly(I:C) | i.p. | E12.5 | 8-10 weeks | Offspring Serum, colonic lymphocytes | Flow cytometry | Increase after immune challenge | yes |
| Sekal, 2021 ( | Rat | Sprague Dawley | both | 10 per group | Neurodevelopment disorder induced by hyperosmotic consumption by mothers | 5 mL/kg | 21 days | Oral Gavage | n/a | PND 50 | offspring brain homogenates | Elisa | Increase | yes |
| Schwartzer 2017 ( | mice | C57 and FVB/Ant | Female | 12-17 | OVA-induced MIA | 1% (wt/vl) | aerosolised solution of 1% (wt/vl) OVA in PBS | aerosolised | Gestational days 9.5, 12.5, and 17.5 | On gestational day 17.5 | Maternal serum | Flow cytometry | Increase in C57 pregnant dams exposed to OVA | yes |
| Shimizu, 2021 ( | mice | C57BL/6J | both | 8-9 per group | MIA | 20 mg/kg during pregnancy and 20 mg/kg or 4 mg/kg postnatally | poly(I:C) | i.p. | E12.5, 15.5 and 16.5. Pups also received poly(I:C) injections at 3-4 weeks old | 3-4 weeks | Offspring serum | ELISA | Increase in MIA-offspring and MIA-offspring that received postnatal injections of poly(I:C) | yes |
| Shin, 2021 ( | mice | BALB/c hairless mice | both | 9 - 13 | VPA | 600 mg/kg | VPA | i.p. | E12.5 | PND 1, 4, 12 and 21 | Offspring blood, skin and brain | ELISA | Increase on the skin on PND1, 4 and 21 and brain in PND1 | yes |
| Kalish, 2021 ( | mice | C57BL/6 | both | 8 | MIA | 20 mg/kg | Poly(I:C) | i.p. | E12.5 | E14.5 and 18.5 | Foetal cortex | No measurement of IL-17 | IL-17 blockage led to the suppression of integrated stress responses in males | yes** alterations are dependent on IL-17 |
***Observation.