Literature DB >> 19764908

Should dynamic parameters for prediction of fluid responsiveness be indexed to the tidal volume?

S T Vistisen1, J Koefoed-Nielsen, A Larsson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The respiratory variation in the pre-ejection period (Delta PEP) has been used to predict fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients. Recently, we modified this parameter (PEPV) and showed that it was a reliable predictor for post-cardiac surgery, mainly paced, patients when moderately low tidal volumes were used. One of the modifications involved tidal volume indexation, which had not been proposed before for dynamic parameters. The aim of the present animal study was to investigate whether indexation to tidal volume should be part of a new definition of dynamic parameters such as the case for our newly proposed PEPV.
METHODS: Eight prone, anesthetized piglets (23-27 kg) were subjected to a sequence of 25% hypovolemia, normovolemia, and 25% and 50% hypervolemia. At each volemic level, tidal volumes were varied in three steps: 6, 9, and 12 ml/kg. PEP variations (ms) and pulse-pressure variation (PPV) were measured during the three tidal volume steps at each volemic level.
RESULTS: PEP variations increased significantly with increasing tidal volume at all volemic levels but 50% hypervolemia and were proportionally related to the tidal volume at normovolemia. PPV increased significantly with increasing tidal volume at all volemic levels and was roughly proportional to the tidal volume at all volemic levels but hypovolemia.
CONCLUSION: Our study indicates that dynamic parameters are improved by indexing to tidal volume.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19764908     DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2009.02114.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand        ISSN: 0001-5172            Impact factor:   2.105


  6 in total

1.  Using extra systoles and the micro-fluid challenge to predict fluid responsiveness during cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Simon T Vistisen; Jonas M Berg; Mattheus F Boekel; Marco Modestini; Remco Bergman; Jayant S Jainandunsing; Massimo A Mariani; Thomas W L Scheeren
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2018-11-09       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  Using extra systoles to predict fluid responsiveness in cardiothoracic critical care patients.

Authors:  Simon Tilma Vistisen
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2016-07-26       Impact factor: 2.502

3.  Arterial Pressure Variation in Elective Noncardiac Surgery: Identifying Reference Distributions and Modifying Factors.

Authors:  Michael R Mathis; Samuel A Schechtman; Milo C Engoren; Amy M Shanks; Aleda Thompson; Sachin Kheterpal; Kevin K Tremper
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 7.892

Review 4.  Accuracy of stroke volume variation in predicting fluid responsiveness: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zhongheng Zhang; Baolong Lu; Xiaoyan Sheng; Ni Jin
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2011-09-04       Impact factor: 2.078

5.  The ability of stroke volume variation measured by a noninvasive cardiac output monitor to predict fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated children.

Authors:  Ji Yeon Lee; Ji Young Kim; Chang Hyu Choi; Hong Soon Kim; Kyung Cheon Lee; Hyun Jeong Kwak
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2013-08-21       Impact factor: 1.655

6.  The impact of inspiratory pressure on stroke volume variation and the evaluation of indexing stroke volume variation to inspiratory pressure under various preload conditions in experimental animals.

Authors:  Yu Kawazoe; Tsuyoshi Nakashima; Toshie Iseri; Chiaki Yonetani; Kentaro Ueda; Yuka Fujimoto; Seiya Kato
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2015-03-15       Impact factor: 2.078

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.