Literature DB >> 14660495

The respiratory change in preejection period: a new method to predict fluid responsiveness.

Karim Bendjelid1, Peter M Suter, Jacques A Romand.   

Abstract

The accuracy and clinical utility of preload indexes as bedside indicators of fluid responsiveness in patients after cardiac surgery is controversial. This study evaluates whether respiratory changes (Delta) in the preejection period (PEP; DeltaPEP) predict fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients. Sixteen postcoronary artery bypass surgery patients, deeply sedated under mechanical ventilation, were enrolled. PEP was defined as the time interval between the beginning of the Q wave on the electrocardiogram and the upstroke of the radial arterial pressure. DeltaPEP (%) was defined as the difference between expiratory and inspiratory PEP measured over one respiratory cycle. We also measured cardiac output, stroke volume index, right atrial pressure, pulmonary arterial occlusion pressure, respiratory change in pulse pressure, systolic pressure variation, and the Deltadown component of SPV. Data were measured without positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and after application of a PEEP of 10 cmH2O (PEEP10). When PEEP10 induced a decrease of >15% in mean arterial pressure value, then measurements were re-performed before and after volume expansion. Volume loading was done in eight patients. Right atrial pressure and pulmonary arterial occlusion pressure before volume expansion did not correlate with the change in stroke volume index after the fluid challenge. Systolic pressure variation, DeltaPEP, Deltadown, and change in pulse pressure before volume expansion correlated with stroke volume index change after fluid challenge (r2 = 0.52, 0.57, 0.68, and 0.83, respectively). In deeply sedated, mechanically ventilated patients after cardiac surgery, DeltaPEP, a new method, can be used to predict fluid responsiveness and hemodynamic response to PEEP10.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14660495     DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00435.2003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)        ISSN: 0161-7567


  20 in total

1.  Pre-ejection period, contractility and preload. A fascinating riddle.

Authors:  Karim Bendjelid
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2007-10-30       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  Change in pulse transit time and pre-ejection period during head-up tilt-induced progressive central hypovolaemia.

Authors:  Gregory S H Chan; Paul M Middleton; Branko G Celler; Lu Wang; Nigel H Lovell
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2007-08-16       Impact factor: 2.502

3.  Impact of withdrawal of 450 ml of blood on respiration-induced oscillations of the ear plethysmographic waveform.

Authors:  Michael J Gesquiere; Aymen A Awad; David G Silverman; Robert G Stout; Denis H Jablonka; Tyler J Silverman; Kirk H Shelley
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2007-08-16       Impact factor: 2.502

4.  The pre-ejection period during the Muller manoeuvre: mismatch or misreading?

Authors:  Karim Bendjelid
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 2.502

5.  Variations in the pre-ejection period induced by deep breathing do not predict the hemodynamic response to early haemorrhage in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  Simon Tilma Vistisen; Peter Juhl-Olsen; Christian Alcaraz Frederiksen; Hans Kirkegaard
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2013-10-29       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 6.  [Meta-analyses on measurement precision of non-invasive hemodynamic monitoring technologies in adults].

Authors:  G Pestel; K Fukui; M Higashi; I Schmidtmann; C Werner
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 1.041

7.  Using extra systoles and the micro-fluid challenge to predict fluid responsiveness during cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Simon T Vistisen; Jonas M Berg; Mattheus F Boekel; Marco Modestini; Remco Bergman; Jayant S Jainandunsing; Massimo A Mariani; Thomas W L Scheeren
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2018-11-09       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 8.  Respiratory variations in the arterial pressure during mechanical ventilation reflect volume status and fluid responsiveness.

Authors:  Azriel Perel; Reuven Pizov; Shamay Cotev
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 17.440

9.  Pulse pressure variations to predict fluid responsiveness: influence of tidal volume.

Authors:  Daniel De Backer; Sarah Heenen; Michael Piagnerelli; Marc Koch; Jean-Louis Vincent
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2005-03-08       Impact factor: 17.440

10.  Pulse pressure variation and volume responsiveness during acutely increased pulmonary artery pressure: an experimental study.

Authors:  Fritz Daudel; David Tüller; Stefanie Krähenbühl; Stephan M Jakob; Jukka Takala
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2010-06-24       Impact factor: 9.097

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.