Literature DB >> 30407261

Intraoperative Multimodal Monitoring in Pedicle Subtraction Osteotomies of the Lumbar Spine: A Narrative Literature Review.

Jianning Shao1,2, Bryan S Lee3, Dominic Pelle4, Maxwell Y Lee1,2, Jason Savage4, Joseph E Tanenbaum2, Thomas E Mroz4, Michael P Steinmetz3,4.   

Abstract

The use of intraoperative multimodal monitoring (IOM) in spinal deformity surgeries is well documented. In particular, pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO), a corrective procedure for sagittal deformity of the spine, often involves IOM usage. By providing immediate feedback to the operating surgeon, IOM has the potential to eliminate or at least minimize the risk of iatrogenic neurological injury. However, despite the widespread usage of IOM, there is currently no standardization of IOM usage in complex spine surgeries, including lumbar PSOs, and decisions concerning IOM utilization are often driven by surgeon experience and preference. This creates a state of clinical equipoise, which is further complicated by the varying degrees of benefit that IOM has on patient outcomes depending on the operation and spinal levels involved. For instance, while IOM use in thoracic PSOs has been shown to be effective, there is no established consensus on the net impact of IOM use in PSOs of the lumbar spine. Although IOM has the potential to mitigate neurological damage, it also increases operation time and cost; thus, it should only be used in operations where it will have a net positive impact on patient outcomes. The question thus becomes whether PSO of the lumbar spine is one such operation. To address this, we examine the most frequently used IOM modalities and evaluate their current usage and efficacy in lumbar PSOs. Furthermore, we will also examine the utility of IOM for other surgeries of the lumbar spine, including corrective procedures for idiopathic scoliosis and degenerative scoliosis, and routine lumbar procedures, such as discectomies and decompression surgeries for foraminal and canal stenosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30407261      PMCID: PMC6499651          DOI: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000740

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Spine Surg        ISSN: 2380-0186            Impact factor:   1.876


  35 in total

1.  PSO without neuromonitoring: analysis of peri-op complication rate after lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomy in adults.

Authors:  Per D Trobisch; Steven W Hwang; Steffen Drange
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Pedicle subtraction osteotomy through pseudarthrosis to correct thoracolumbar kyphotic deformity in advanced ankylosing spondylitis.

Authors:  Bang-ping Qian; Yong Qiu; Bin Wang; Xu Sun; Ze-zhang Zhu; Jun Jiang; Ming-liang Ji
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-11-08       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Clinical outcome results of pedicle subtraction osteotomy in ankylosing spondylitis with kyphotic deformity.

Authors:  Ki-Tack Kim; Kyung-Soo Suk; Yoon-Je Cho; Gyu-Pyo Hong; Byung-Joo Park
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2002-03-15       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Vertebral osteotomy for correction of kyphosis in ankylosing spondylitis.

Authors:  E Thomasen
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1985-04       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Neurologic complications of lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomy: a 10-year assessment.

Authors:  Jacob M Buchowski; Keith H Bridwell; Lawrence G Lenke; Craig A Kuhns; Ronald A Lehman; Youngjung J Kim; David Stewart; Chris Baldus
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2007-09-15       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  The efficacy of motor evoked potentials in fixed sagittal imbalance deformity correction surgery.

Authors:  Jeremy A Lieberman; Russ Lyon; John Feiner; Serena S Hu; Sigurd H Berven
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2008-06-01       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 7.  Current approach on spinal cord monitoring: the point of view of the neurologist, the anesthesiologist and the spine surgeon.

Authors:  Thomas N Pajewski; Vincent Arlet; Lawrence H Phillips
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-07-10       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Role of pelvic incidence, thoracic kyphosis, and patient factors on sagittal plane correction following pedicle subtraction osteotomy.

Authors:  Peter S Rose; Keith H Bridwell; Lawrence G Lenke; Geoffrey A Cronen; Daniel S Mulconrey; Jacob M Buchowski; Youngjung J Kim
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2009-04-15       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Somatosensory evoked potential spinal cord monitoring reduces neurologic deficits after scoliosis surgery: results of a large multicenter survey.

Authors:  M R Nuwer; E G Dawson; L G Carlson; L E Kanim; J E Sherman
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1995-01

10.  Complications of posterior vertebral resection for spinal deformity.

Authors:  Sung-Soo Kim; Beom-Cheol Cho; Jin-Hyok Kim; Dong-Ju Lim; Ji-Yong Park; Beom-Jung Lee; Se-Il Suk
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2012-12-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.