Literature DB >> 17873818

Neurologic complications of lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomy: a 10-year assessment.

Jacob M Buchowski1, Keith H Bridwell, Lawrence G Lenke, Craig A Kuhns, Ronald A Lehman, Youngjung J Kim, David Stewart, Chris Baldus.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Clinical, radiographic, and outcomes assessment focusing on neurologic complications in patients undergoing pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO). Clinical data were collected prospectively. Radiographic analysis was performed retrospectively.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate intraoperative and postoperative neurologic deficits following lumbar PSOs in order to determine risk factors, treatment strategies, and patient outcome. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Although technically demanding, PSOs have been increasingly used to restore lumbar lordosis and correct sagittal deformity. Although some reports have commented on various complications of the procedure, to our knowledge, there have been no studies focusing on neurologic complications of the osteotomy.
METHODS: An analysis of 108 consecutive patients with an average age of 54.8 +/- 14.0 years and treated with a lumbar PSO at 1 institution over a 10-year period (1995-2005) was performed. Medical records, radiographs, and neuromonitoring data were analyzed. Clinical outcome was assessed using the Oswestry Disability Index and the Scoliosis Research Society (SRS)-24 instruments.
RESULTS: A total of 108 PSOs were performed. Following surgery, lumbar lordosis increased from -17.1 degrees +/- 19.3 degrees to -49.3 degrees +/- 14.7 degrees (P < 0.000), and sagittal balance improved from 131 +/- 73 mm to 23 +/- 48 mm (P < 0.000). Intraoperative and postoperative deficits (defined as motor loss of 2 grades or more or loss of bowel/bladder control) were seen in 12 patients (11.1%) and were permanent in 3 patients (2.8%). With time motor function improved by 1 grade in 2 patients and all 3 were able to ambulate. Intraoperative neuromonitoring did not detect the deficits. In 9 patients, additional surgical intervention consisted of central enlargement and further decompression. Deficits were thought to be due to a combination of subluxation, residual dorsal impingement, and dural buckling.
CONCLUSION: Intraoperative or postoperative neurologic deficits are relatively common following a PSO; however, in a majority of cases, deficits are not likely to be permanent.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17873818     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31814b2d52

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  59 in total

Review 1.  Osteotomy of the spine for multifocal deformities.

Authors:  Ibrahim Obeid; Louis Boissière; Jean-Marc Vital; Anouar Bourghli
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Pedicle subtraction osteotomy in degenerative scoliosis.

Authors:  Rune Hedlund
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Pedicle subtraction osteotomy in flat back syndrome 38 years after Harrington instrumentation for AIS.

Authors:  Rune Hedlund
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Surgical management of severe rigid tuberculous kyphosis of dorsolumbar spine.

Authors:  Myung-Sang Moon; Sung-Soo Kim; Bong-Jin Lee; Jeong-Lim Moon; Young-Wan Moon
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-03-29       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  PSO without neuromonitoring: analysis of peri-op complication rate after lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomy in adults.

Authors:  Per D Trobisch; Steven W Hwang; Steffen Drange
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 6.  Spinal pedicle subtraction osteotomy for fixed sagittal imbalance patients.

Authors:  Seung-Jae Hyun; Yongjung J Kim; Seung-Chul Rhim
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2013-11-16       Impact factor: 1.337

Review 7.  Intraoperative Multimodal Monitoring in Pedicle Subtraction Osteotomies of the Lumbar Spine: A Narrative Literature Review.

Authors:  Jianning Shao; Bryan S Lee; Dominic Pelle; Maxwell Y Lee; Jason Savage; Joseph E Tanenbaum; Thomas E Mroz; Michael P Steinmetz
Journal:  Clin Spine Surg       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 1.876

Review 8.  Posterior vertebral column resection in spinal deformity: a systematic review.

Authors:  Changsheng Yang; Zhaomin Zheng; Hui Liu; Jianru Wang; Yongjung Jay Kim; Samuel Cho
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-01-20       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 9.  Spinal osteotomy in the presence of massive lumbar epidural scarring.

Authors:  Vincent Arlet
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-11-27       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Osteotomy of the spine to correct the spinal deformity.

Authors:  Ki-Tack Kim; Kyoung-Jun Park; Jung-Hee Lee
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2009-12-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.