Literature DB >> 18520928

The efficacy of motor evoked potentials in fixed sagittal imbalance deformity correction surgery.

Jeremy A Lieberman1, Russ Lyon, John Feiner, Serena S Hu, Sigurd H Berven.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of transcranial motor evoked potential (TcMEP) responses and clinical outcome.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the sensitivity and specificity of TcMEPs to detect and predict isolated nerve root injury in selected patients having complex lumbar spine surgery. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The surgical correction of fixed sagittal plane deformity involves posterior-based osteotomies and significant changes in the length of and space for the neural elements. The role of transcranial motor-evoked potential (TcMEP) monitoring in osteotomies below the conus has not been established. The purpose of this paper is to describe the relationship between neural complications from surgery and intraoperative TcMEP changes.
METHODS: We retrospectively studied 35 consecutive patients in a single center treated with posterior-based osteotomies for the correction of fixed sagittal plane deformity. Transcranial motor-evoked potentials, free-running and evoked electromyography data were assessed for each case. Analysis includes description of the intraoperative changes observed, and a correlation of changes with postoperative clinical findings.
RESULTS: Thirty-five consecutive patients underwent surgery for fixed sagittal plane deformity with complete neuromonitoring data. Twenty-five patients (71%) had an episode of greater than 80% reduction in MEP amplitude to at least 1 muscle. Fifteen of 25 had improvement of TcMEPs after repositioning of the legs (1), additional surgical decompression (4), or volume and pharmacologic resuscitation (10). All 15 of these awoke with no detectable neurologic injury. Ten patients (29%) had reduced TcMEP signals that did not improve despite further decompression and manipulation of the osteotomy site. All 10 had a greater than 67% drop in TcMEPs for at least 1 muscle persisting at the end of the case, and all had a postoperative neurologic deficit. The TcMEP changes in patients who demonstrated nerve injury postoperatively were observed most often during osteotomy closure or sustained dural retraction. 9 patients had weakness involving the iliopsoas or quadriceps; 1 patient had isolated unilateral dorsiflexion weakness. Monitoring TcMEPs in multiple muscle groups was both highly sensitive and specific for predicting injury. Nine patients had recovered motor function completely by discharge, and all but 1 patient (grade 4/5) had a normal motor examination at 6-week follow-up.
CONCLUSION: The use of TcMEPs is sensitive and specific to change in neural function. No patients had a false negative test. The rate of neural deficits is consistent with previous literature, suggesting that TcMEP monitoring may not prevent neural injury. However, there were several cases in which intraoperative intervention resulted in recovery of TcMEPs, and none of these patients sustained any postoperative neural deficit. The severity of neural deficits in this series was minor and the duration was limited. TcMEPs may contribute to calling attention to the need for intraoperative corrections including widening decompressions, improving perfusion, and limiting deformity correction so that more severe neural compromise may be prevented.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18520928     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318175c292

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  16 in total

1.  Intraoperative spinal cord and nerve root monitoring: a survey of Canadian spine surgeons.

Authors:  Lissa Peeling; Stephen Hentschel; Richard Fox; Hamilton Hall; Daryl R Fourney
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 2.089

2.  Increases in voltage may produce false-negatives when using transcranial motor evoked potentials to detect an isolated nerve root injury.

Authors:  Russ Lyon; Anthony Gibson; Shane Burch; Jeremy Lieberman
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2011-01-05       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 3.  Intraoperative Multimodal Monitoring in Pedicle Subtraction Osteotomies of the Lumbar Spine: A Narrative Literature Review.

Authors:  Jianning Shao; Bryan S Lee; Dominic Pelle; Maxwell Y Lee; Jason Savage; Joseph E Tanenbaum; Thomas E Mroz; Michael P Steinmetz
Journal:  Clin Spine Surg       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 1.876

4.  Mixed-muscle electrode placement ("jumping" muscles) may produce false-negative results when using transcranial motor evoked potentials to detect an isolated nerve root injury in a porcine model.

Authors:  Russ Lyon; Shane Burch; Jeremy Lieberman
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2009-10-28       Impact factor: 2.502

5.  Trending algorithm discriminates hemodynamic from injury related TcMEP amplitude loss.

Authors:  Paul Jasiukaitis; Russ Lyon
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2019-02-06       Impact factor: 2.502

6.  A novel mouthpiece prevents bite injuries caused by intraoperative transcranial electric motor-evoked potential monitoring.

Authors:  Kyoko Oshita; Noboru Saeki; Takayasu Kubo; Hitoshi Abekura; Nobuhiro Tanaka; Masashi Kawamoto
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2016-07-28       Impact factor: 2.078

7.  Transcranial motor evoked potentials electrically elicited by multi-train stimulation can reflect isolated nerve root injury more precisely than those by conventional multi-pulse stimulation: an experimental study in rats.

Authors:  Takuhei Kozaki; Shunji Tsutsui; Hiroshi Yamada
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2019-03-05       Impact factor: 2.502

8.  False-negative transcranial motor evoked potentials (TcMEPs) during surgery for congenital lumbar kyphoscoliosis: a case report.

Authors:  Masayuki Ohashi; Kei Watanabe; Kenta Furutani; Toru Hirano; Keiichi Katsumi; Hirokazu Shoji; Tatsuki Mizouchi; Naoto Endo
Journal:  Spinal Cord Ser Cases       Date:  2017-09-21

9.  Trans-cranial motor evoked potential detection of femoral nerve injury in trans-psoas lateral lumbar interbody fusion.

Authors:  Kshitij Chaudhary; Katharine Speights; Kevin McGuire; Andrew P White
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2015-06-17       Impact factor: 2.502

10.  Changes in transcranial motor evoked potentials during hemorrhage are associated with increased serum propofol concentrations.

Authors:  Jeremy A Lieberman; John Feiner; Mark Rollins; Russ Lyon; Paul Jasiukaitis
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 2.502

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.