Per D Trobisch1, Steven W Hwang2, Steffen Drange3. 1. Eifelklinik St. Brigida, Zentrum für Orthopädische Chirurgie, Kammerbruchstr. 8, 52152, Simmerath, Germany. pertrobisch@gmail.com. 2. Department of Neurosurgery, Tufts Medical Center, 800 Washington Street, Box 178, Boston, MA, 02111, USA. 3. Orthopädische Klinik, Universitätsklinik Magdeburg, Leipziger Str. 44, 39120, Magdeburg, Germany.
Abstract
PURPOSE: A decompensated sagittal imbalance has been associated with worsening health-related quality of life outcomes and increasing pain. Significant improvement in sagittal balance can be achieved using a pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO); however, this procedure has a high complication profile. A lumbar PSO has the advantages of direct visualization of all neural structures and safer retraction of the thecal sac. Sacrificing neuromonitoring may reduce anaesthesia time and lead to improved cost effectiveness of the surgery. However, there are no studies analyzing the complication rate of lumbar PSO without the use of neuromonitoring. We hypothesize that the neurologic complication rate remains comparable to published studies even without the use of intraoperative neuromonitoring. METHODS: The medical records of all patients of a single institution who received a lumbar PSO for sagittal imbalance between July 2012 and June 2014 were retrospectively analyzed. All surgeries were performed by the first author and without the use of intraoperative neuromonitoring. We analyzed the 30-day complication rate. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients were included in this study. The average age at surgery was 67 years. 16 patients had at least one previous lumbar surgery. The average fusion length was seven segments. All patients were instrumented to the sacrum and 19 patients additionally received spinopelvic instrumentation. The average amount of focal correction was 28°. The average surgical time was 362 min and blood loss was 2302 mL. A total of eight patients with complications were identified. There was a new neurologic postoperative deficit in two patients presenting as a foot drop. Five patients had an unplanned revision surgery. CONCLUSION: Historically, PSOs are associated with a high surgical complication rate and our results show comparable outcomes and complications to those previously reported. In our series, the absence of neuromonitoring in lumbar PSOs does not appear to increase the risk of neurological injury.
PURPOSE: A decompensated sagittal imbalance has been associated with worsening health-related quality of life outcomes and increasing pain. Significant improvement in sagittal balance can be achieved using a pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO); however, this procedure has a high complication profile. A lumbar PSO has the advantages of direct visualization of all neural structures and safer retraction of the thecal sac. Sacrificing neuromonitoring may reduce anaesthesia time and lead to improved cost effectiveness of the surgery. However, there are no studies analyzing the complication rate of lumbar PSO without the use of neuromonitoring. We hypothesize that the neurologic complication rate remains comparable to published studies even without the use of intraoperative neuromonitoring. METHODS: The medical records of all patients of a single institution who received a lumbar PSO for sagittal imbalance between July 2012 and June 2014 were retrospectively analyzed. All surgeries were performed by the first author and without the use of intraoperative neuromonitoring. We analyzed the 30-day complication rate. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients were included in this study. The average age at surgery was 67 years. 16 patients had at least one previous lumbar surgery. The average fusion length was seven segments. All patients were instrumented to the sacrum and 19 patients additionally received spinopelvic instrumentation. The average amount of focal correction was 28°. The average surgical time was 362 min and blood loss was 2302 mL. A total of eight patients with complications were identified. There was a new neurologic postoperative deficit in two patients presenting as a foot drop. Five patients had an unplanned revision surgery. CONCLUSION: Historically, PSOs are associated with a high surgical complication rate and our results show comparable outcomes and complications to those previously reported. In our series, the absence of neuromonitoring in lumbar PSOs does not appear to increase the risk of neurological injury.
Authors: Joshua M Pahys; James T Guille; Linda P D'Andrea; Amer F Samdani; Joshua Beck; Randal R Betz Journal: J Am Acad Orthop Surg Date: 2009-07 Impact factor: 3.020
Authors: Joshua D Auerbach; Lawrence G Lenke; Keith H Bridwell; Jennifer K Sehn; Andrew H Milby; David Bumpass; Charles H Crawford; Brian A OʼShaughnessy; Jacob M Buchowski; Michael S Chang; Lukas P Zebala; Brenda A Sides Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2012-06-15 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Michael G Vitale; David L Skaggs; Gregory I Pace; Margaret L Wright; Hiroko Matsumoto; Richard C E Anderson; Douglas L Brockmeyer; John P Dormans; John B Emans; Mark A Erickson; John M Flynn; Michael P Glotzbecker; Kamal N Ibrahim; Stephen J Lewis; Scott J Luhmann; Anil Mendiratta; B Stephens Richards; James O Sanders; Suken A Shah; John T Smith; Kit M Song; Paul D Sponseller; Daniel J Sucato; David P Roye; Lawrence G Lenke Journal: Spine Deform Date: 2014-08-27
Authors: F Pastorelli; M Di Silvestre; R Plasmati; R Michelucci; T Greggi; A Morigi; M R Bacchin; S Bonarelli; A Cioni; F Vommaro; N Fini; F Lolli; P Parisini Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2011-03-18 Impact factor: 3.134
Authors: Michael P Kelly; Lawrence G Lenke; Christopher I Shaffrey; Christopher P Ames; Leah Y Carreon; Virginie Lafage; Justin S Smith; Adam L Shimer Journal: Neurosurg Focus Date: 2014-05 Impact factor: 4.047
Authors: Earl D Thuet; Jacquelyn C Winscher; Anne M Padberg; Keith H Bridwell; Lawrence G Lenke; Matthew B Dobbs; Mario Schootman; Scott J Luhmann Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2010-09-15 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Jacob M Buchowski; Keith H Bridwell; Lawrence G Lenke; Craig A Kuhns; Ronald A Lehman; Youngjung J Kim; David Stewart; Chris Baldus Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2007-09-15 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Jonathan R Kamerlink; Thomas Errico; Shaun Xavier; Ashish Patel; Amar Patel; Alexa Cohen; Mark Reiger; Joseph Dryer; David Feldman; Baron Lonner; Aleksandar Beric; Frank Schwab Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2010-01-15 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Ian M McCarthy; Richard A Hostin; Christopher P Ames; Han J Kim; Justin S Smith; Ohenaba Boachie-Adjei; Frank J Schwab; Eric O Klineberg; Christopher I Shaffrey; Munish C Gupta; David W Polly Journal: Spine J Date: 2014-01-24 Impact factor: 4.166
Authors: Hamid Hassanzadeh; Amit Jain; Mostafa H El Dafrawy; Michael C Ain; Addisu Mesfin; Richard L Skolasky; Khaled M Kebaish Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2013-04-20 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Jianning Shao; Bryan S Lee; Dominic Pelle; Maxwell Y Lee; Jason Savage; Joseph E Tanenbaum; Thomas E Mroz; Michael P Steinmetz Journal: Clin Spine Surg Date: 2019-05 Impact factor: 1.876