Literature DB >> 30406825

[Leadless endocardial ultrasound based left ventricular stimulation : WISE CRT System: alternative to conventional methods].

C Butter1, S Fehrendt2, V Möller2, M Seifert2.   

Abstract

There are still several limitations in delivering cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT). After 6 months, 20-40% of patients fail to have clinical benefit due to various reasons. Endocardial stimulation rather than conventional epicardial pacing has been shown to be more physiological, improves electrical stimulation of the left ventricle (LV), has less dispersion of electrical activity and results in better resynchronisation. The WiSE™ CRT System ("Wireless stimulation endocardial system"; EBR Systems, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) provides an option for wireless, LV endocardial pacing triggered by a conventional right ventricular pacing spike from a co-implant. The feasibility of the WiSE™ CRT System has been successfully demonstrated in a population of failed cardiac resynchronisation patients with either failed implantation of a conventional system, nonresponse to conventional therapy or upgrade from pacemaker or defibrillator, where a conventional system was not an option. The WiSE™ CRT System is an innovative technology with promising safety, performance and preliminary efficacy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiac resynchronization therapy; Heart failure; Implantation; QRS complex; Ultrasound

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30406825     DOI: 10.1007/s00399-018-0605-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol        ISSN: 0938-7412


  45 in total

1.  Endocardial left ventricular pacing improves cardiac resynchronization therapy in chronic asynchronous infarction and heart failure models.

Authors:  Marc Strik; Leonard M Rademakers; Caroline J M van Deursen; Arne van Hunnik; Marion Kuiper; Catherine Klersy; Angelo Auricchio; Frits W Prinzen
Journal:  Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol       Date:  2011-11-07

2.  Improved implant and postoperative lead performance in CRT-D patients implanted with a quadripolar left ventricular lead. A 6-month follow-up analysis from a multicenter prospective comparative study.

Authors:  Giovanni B Forleo; Luigi Di Biase; Germana Panattoni; Massimo Mantica; Quintino Parisi; Annamaria Martino; Augusto Pappalardo; Domenico Sergi; Manfredi Tesauro; Lida P Papavasileiou; Luca Santini; Leonardo Calò; Claudio Tondo; Andrea Natale; Francesco Romeo
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2014-12-13       Impact factor: 1.900

3.  Transseptal Delivery of a Leadless Left Ventricular Endocardial Pacing Electrode.

Authors:  Benjamin J Sieniewicz; Justin S Gould; Helen M Rimington; Nicholas Ioannou; Christopher A Rinaldi
Journal:  JACC Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2017-09-13

4.  Age, prognostic impact of QRS prolongation and left bundle branch block, and utilization of cardiac resynchronization therapy: findings from 14,713 patients in the Swedish Heart Failure Registry.

Authors:  Lars H Lund; Lina Benson; Marcus Ståhlberg; Frieder Braunschweig; Magnus Edner; Ulf Dahlström; Cecilia Linde
Journal:  Eur J Heart Fail       Date:  2014-09-08       Impact factor: 15.534

5.  Prognostic implications of mitral regurgitation in patients after cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Manlio Cipriani; Maurizio Lunati; Maurizio Landolina; Alessandro Proclemer; Giuseppe Boriani; Renato P Ricci; Roberto Rordorf; Maria Vittoria Matassini; Luigi Padeletti; Saverio Iacopino; Giulio Molon; Giovanni B Perego; Maurizio Gasparini
Journal:  Eur J Heart Fail       Date:  2016-07-13       Impact factor: 15.534

6.  Impact of mitral regurgitation on the outcome of patients treated with CRT-D: data from the InSync ICD Italian Registry.

Authors:  Giuseppe Boriani; Maurizio Gasparini; Maurizio Landolina; Maurizio Lunati; Mauro Biffi; Massimo Santini; Luigi Padeletti; Giulio Molon; Gianluca Botto; Tiziana de Santo; Sergio Valsecchi
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2011-12-02       Impact factor: 1.976

7.  Management and outcome of permanent pacemaker and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator infections.

Authors:  Muhammad R Sohail; Daniel Z Uslan; Akbar H Khan; Paul A Friedman; David L Hayes; Walter R Wilson; James M Steckelberg; Sarah Stoner; Larry M Baddour
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2007-04-23       Impact factor: 24.094

8.  First-in-man implantation of leadless ultrasound-based cardiac stimulation pacing system: novel endocardial left ventricular resynchronization therapy in heart failure patients.

Authors:  Angelo Auricchio; Peter-Paul Delnoy; François Regoli; Martin Seifert; Thanasie Markou; Christian Butter
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2013-05-23       Impact factor: 5.214

9.  Subtotal innominate vein occlusion after unsuccessful pacemaker implantation for resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Bart P Van Putte; Patricia F A Bakker
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 1.976

10.  Upgrades from a previous device compared to de novo cardiac resynchronization therapy in the European Society of Cardiology CRT Survey II.

Authors:  Cecilia M Linde; Camilla Normand; Nigussie Bogale; Angelo Auricchio; Maciej Sterlinski; Germanas Marinskis; Christian Sticherling; Alan Bulava; Óscar Cano Pérez; Alexander H Maass; Klaus K Witte; Roin Rekvava; Salima Abdelali; Kenneth Dickstein
Journal:  Eur J Heart Fail       Date:  2018-06-20       Impact factor: 15.534

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Optimal CRT Implantation-Where and How To Place the Left-Ventricular Lead?

Authors:  Christian Butter; Christian Georgi; Martin Stockburger
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2021-09-08

2.  WiSE CRT Is Beneficial for Heart Failure Patients as a Rescue Therapy: Evidence From a Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Jiehui Cang; Yaowu Liu; Didi Zhu; Shangshang Liu; Junxian Shen; Hongyu Miao; Qianxing Zhou; Long Chen
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-03-15
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.