Literature DB >> 22132940

Impact of mitral regurgitation on the outcome of patients treated with CRT-D: data from the InSync ICD Italian Registry.

Giuseppe Boriani1, Maurizio Gasparini, Maurizio Landolina, Maurizio Lunati, Mauro Biffi, Massimo Santini, Luigi Padeletti, Giulio Molon, Gianluca Botto, Tiziana de Santo, Sergio Valsecchi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We assessed the influence of clinically significant mitral regurgitation (MR) on clinical-echocardiographic response and outcome in heart failure (HF) patients treated with a biventricular defibrillator (cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator [CRT-D]). METHODS AND
RESULTS: A total of 659 HF patients underwent successful implantation of CRT-D and were enrolled in a multicenter prospective registry (median follow-up of 15 months). Following baseline echocardiographic evaluation, patients were stratified into two groups according to the severity of MR: 232 patients with more than mild MR (Group MR+: grade 2, 3, and 4 MR) versus 427 patients with mild (grade 1) or no functional MR (Group MR-). On 6- and 12-month echocardiographic evaluation, MR was seen to have improved in the vast majority of MR+ patients, while it remained unchanged in most MR- patients. On 12-month follow-up evaluation, a comparable response to CRT was observed in the two groups, in terms of the extent of left ventricular reverse remodeling and combined clinical and echocardiographic response. During long-term follow-up, event-free survival did not differ between MR+ and MR- patients, even when subpopulations of patients with ischemic heart disease and with dilated cardiomyopathy were analyzed separately. On multivariate analysis, the only independent predictor of death from any cause was the lack of β-blocker use.
CONCLUSIONS: This observational analysis supports the use of CRT-D in HF patients with clinically significant MR; MR had no major influence on patient outcome. ©2011, The Authors. Journal compilation ©2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22132940     DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2011.03280.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol        ISSN: 0147-8389            Impact factor:   1.976


  6 in total

Review 1.  [Leadless endocardial ultrasound based left ventricular stimulation : WISE CRT System: alternative to conventional methods].

Authors:  C Butter; S Fehrendt; V Möller; M Seifert
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2018-11-08

Review 2.  Clinical, laboratory, and pacing predictors of CRT response.

Authors:  Jagdesh Kandala; Robert K Altman; Mi Young Park; Jagmeet P Singh
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2012-02-24       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 3.  A ventricular assist device as a bridge to recovery, decision making, or transplantation in patients with advanced cardiac failure.

Authors:  Siyamek Neragi-Miandoab
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2012-07-20       Impact factor: 2.549

4.  Survival and Cardiovascular Outcomes of Patients With Secondary Mitral Regurgitation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Anna Sannino; Robert L Smith; Gabriele G Schiattarella; Bruno Trimarco; Giovanni Esposito; Paul A Grayburn
Journal:  JAMA Cardiol       Date:  2017-10-01       Impact factor: 14.676

Review 5.  Devices in the management of advanced, chronic heart failure.

Authors:  William T Abraham; Sakima A Smith
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2012-12-11       Impact factor: 32.419

6.  Echocardiographic Predictors of Worse Outcome After Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy.

Authors:  Eduardo Arrais Rocha; Francisca Tatiana Moreira Pereira; José Sebastião Abreu; José Wellington O Lima; Marcelo de Paula M Monteiro; Almino Cavalcante Rocha Neto; Ana Rosa Pinto Quidute; Camilla Viana A Goés; Carlos Roberto Martins Rodrigues Sobrinho; Maurício Ibrahim Scanavacca
Journal:  Arq Bras Cardiol       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 2.000

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.