Literature DB >> 22062796

Endocardial left ventricular pacing improves cardiac resynchronization therapy in chronic asynchronous infarction and heart failure models.

Marc Strik1, Leonard M Rademakers, Caroline J M van Deursen, Arne van Hunnik, Marion Kuiper, Catherine Klersy, Angelo Auricchio, Frits W Prinzen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Studies in canine hearts with acute left bundle branch block (LBBB) showed that endocardial left ventricular (LV) pacing improves the efficacy of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) compared with conventional epicardial LV pacing. The present study explores the efficacy of endocardial CRT in more compromised hearts and the mechanisms of such beneficial effects. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Measurements were performed in 22 dogs, 9 with acute LBBB, 7 with chronic LBBB combined with infarction (embolization; LBBB plus myocardial infarction, and concentric remodeling), and 6 with chronic LBBB and heart failure (rapid pacing, LBBB+HF, and eccentric remodeling). A head-to-head comparison was performed of the effects of endocardial and epicardial LV pacing at 8 sites. LV activation times were measured using ≈100 endocardial and epicardial electrodes and noncontact mapping. Pump function was assessed from right ventricular and LV pressures. Endocardial CRT resulted in better electric resynchronization than epicardial CRT in all models, although the benefit was larger in concentrically remodeled LBBB plus myocardial infarction than in eccentrically remodeled LBBB+HF hearts (19% versus 10%). In LBBB and LBBB+HF animals, endocardial conduction was ≈50% faster than epicardial conduction; in all models, transmural impulse conduction was ≈25% faster when pacing from the endocardium than from the epicardium. Hemodynamic effects were congruent with electric effects.
CONCLUSIONS: Endocardial CRT improves electric synchrony of activation and LV pump function compared with conventional epicardial CRT in compromised canine LBBB hearts. This benefit can be explained by a shorter path length along the endocardium and by faster circumferential and transmural impulse conduction during endocardial LV pacing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22062796     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCEP.111.965814

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol        ISSN: 1941-3084


  21 in total

Review 1.  Left ventricular endocardial pacing and multisite pacing to improve CRT response.

Authors:  Sylvain Ploux; Zachary Whinnett; Pierre Bordachar
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 4.132

2.  Mechanistic insight into prolonged electromechanical delay in dyssynchronous heart failure: a computational study.

Authors:  Jason Constantino; Yuxuan Hu; Albert C Lardo; Natalia A Trayanova
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2013-08-09       Impact factor: 4.733

Review 3.  [Leadless endocardial ultrasound based left ventricular stimulation : WISE CRT System: alternative to conventional methods].

Authors:  C Butter; S Fehrendt; V Möller; M Seifert
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2018-11-08

Review 4.  Clinical, laboratory, and pacing predictors of CRT response.

Authors:  Jagdesh Kandala; Robert K Altman; Mi Young Park; Jagmeet P Singh
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2012-02-24       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 5.  Endocardial pacing: the wave of the future?

Authors:  Pierre Bordachar; Sylvain Ploux; Joost Lumens
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 2.931

6.  Comparative electromechanical and hemodynamic effects of left ventricular and biventricular pacing in dyssynchronous heart failure: electrical resynchronization versus left-right ventricular interaction.

Authors:  Joost Lumens; Sylvain Ploux; Marc Strik; John Gorcsan; Hubert Cochet; Nicolas Derval; Maria Strom; Charu Ramanathan; Philippe Ritter; Michel Haïssaguerre; Pierre Jaïs; Theo Arts; Tammo Delhaas; Frits W Prinzen; Pierre Bordachar
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2013-09-04       Impact factor: 24.094

7.  Left ventricular endocardial pacing for the critically ill.

Authors:  C A Rinaldi; A Auricchio; F W Prinzen
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2018-01-19       Impact factor: 17.440

8.  The effect of left ventricular pacing on transmural activation delay in myopathic human hearts.

Authors:  Andreu Porta-Sánchez; Paul Angaran; Stéphane Massé; Krishnakumar Nair; Talha Farid; Karthikeyan Umapathy; John Asta; Sigfus Gizurarson; Kumaraswamy Nanthakumar
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2018-04-01       Impact factor: 5.214

Review 9.  A computational approach to understanding the cardiac electromechanical activation sequence in the normal and failing heart, with translation to the clinical practice of CRT.

Authors:  Jason Constantino; Yuxuan Hu; Natalia A Trayanova
Journal:  Prog Biophys Mol Biol       Date:  2012-08-01       Impact factor: 3.667

Review 10.  Strategies to improve cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Kevin Vernooy; Caroline J M van Deursen; Marc Strik; Frits W Prinzen
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2014-05-20       Impact factor: 32.419

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.